⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 7 findings
F1
Page 25
I agree without reservation.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 26
I agree without resewation.
F2
Page 25
lagree without reservation.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 22
The Sutter County Sherirshall f。 1low Califomia Penal Code Se“ ons 933(o Ⅵi血 respectto response submission to the Presiding」 udge. The Grald Jury requested the Sherirrespond to F3 and R2. Response to Finding 3. I completed the Sk疸堡 Response to the Grand」 ury on August 17,2015 and PIaced ih interottice mailto the Honorabic BHan AЮnson― Presiding Judge with c∝ cOples to the Sutter County BOard ofSupervisors and James Arkcns whO was atthat umethe cAO. This was days piorto the due date ofAugust 24慟.The Board ofSup副 sors and the CAO recelved their cOpy Ofthe response as it was included in the BOS response. Apparcntly the Presiding」 udgc did not. 1077 Civic Center BOulevard,Yuba Cith CA 95993 Phone 530.822.7307 Fax 530.822.7318
F3
Page 5
This finding pertains to the County Sheriff-Coroner, who is an elected official. The Sheriff-Coroner has already responded to the Superior Court. His response is attached at Attachment B.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 6
The Board of Supervisors is uncertain about the meaning of this recommendation and consequently cannot implement it. Penal code Section 9ir sets forth the oath that each member of the Grand Jury is required to take and Section 929 deals with the ability of the Grand Jury to make evidentiary material and other material available to the public.
F4
Page 5
The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Page 6
This recommendation is directed toward citizens. The Board of Supervisors would have no role or responsibility in implementing it. The Sutter County District Attorney and Sutter County Sheriff-Coroner are independently elected ofEcials and, as such, respond directly to the Grand Jury's findings and recommendations concerning their respective ofEces. Copies of the two responses are included in this document as-Attachments A and B. Sutter County Board of Supervisors Response to 2015-16 Grand Jury Report Chewon Solar Enerry Savings Project
F5
Page 5
While the Board of Supervisors commends the Grand Jury for having a complaint form for citizens, this finding does not involve an issue within the Board's purview.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Page 8
The Board of Supervisors disagrees in part with this finding. As mentioned in a separate report to the Grand Jury, the Chevron Project was not rushed. The Chewon Project appeared on the agenda ofthe Board of Supervisors five times over a seven month period, was discussed during a publicly-noticed Board Committee meeting, and was the subject of a public Board Study Session and, two weeks later, a noticed Public Hearing. The proposed use of airport property was ultimately changed to the Acacia Avenue site in the Tovrn of Sutter, while options for the Mental Health array are being considered. tlltimately, delays to the Mental Health array have added time and some expense to the project related to storing purchased solar equipment.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Page 8
The Board of Supervisors agrees with this finding. of r7 Sutter County Board of Supervisors Response to 2015-16 Grand Jury Report
No recommendations for this finding