📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
Sacramento County Grand Jury
• 2008-2009
Child Protective Services: “Nothing Ever Changes – Ever”
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 32 findings
F1
Page 18
There is a longstanding absence on the part of HHS and CPS management to accept responsibility and accountability for the role of CPS in meeting its community responsibilities. This is a recurring criticism found for over a decade of many published reports.
F2
Page 18
A shield of privacy and secrecy that surrounds much of the operations of CPS is unwarranted. This lack of transparency serves to raise questions and leads to inaccurate conclusions being made regarding what takes place in CPS. The acknowledged need to protect the confidentiality of case information can be accomplished without adopting a “closed door” attitude.
F3
Page 19
1: CPS personnel have rarely had performance evaluations.
F4
Page 19
The County’s Human Resources Department (HR) disseminated annual evaluation reminders to CPS management. However no follow-up action was done to see if such evaluations actually took place.
F5
Page 19
HR has neglected to train supervisory personnel in the proper method of personnel evaluation.
F6
Page 19
Substantial finger pointing exists between CPS and HR personnel regarding quality of service.
F7
Page 20
Disciplinary proceedings are compromised by the absence of evaluations of all employees.
F8
Page 20
There is an average time of one year from the start of paid administrative leave to resolution. This contributes to the caseload of other employees, and decreases staff morale.
F9
Page 21
According to sworn testimony, the recent HR reorganization increased the ratio of CPS disciplinary cases per HR analyst.
F10
Page 21
Poor communication between HR and CPS contributes to lengthy disposition of discipline cases.
F11
Page 21
A 22 percent annual turnover rate in CPS social workers is a major impediment to program efficiency and effectiveness.
F12
Page 21
Skilled social workers who do not want to be supervisors have no way to be promoted.
F13
Page 21
1: Except for the first year of employment, employees are not compliant with the 30-hour training requirement. In a sample review of 60 employee records, 50 were not in compliance.
F14
Page 22
Training entries for new employees do not show the correct total number of training hours those employees actually took.
F15
Page 22
1: A caseload is not defined.
F16
Page 22
Social workers do work that could be done by support staff.
F17
Page 22
Management has not required personnel to take full advantage of their available software. CPS management acknowledges its failures to fully use these systems.
F18
Page 23
The Grand Jury found that supervisory personnel and upper management were not adequately using IRIS. The current design of the software changes each case entry information to a red font when the case exceeds certain limits. This is helpful but does not provide enough information about the urgency of the case.
F19
Page 23
The CWS/CMS software package is provided and controlled by the State and cannot be modified by CPS IT personnel. These personnel can recommend appropriate change through statewide user-councils to improve the software.
F20
Page 23
There is a lack of management control of SDM usage. It was reported to the Grand Jury that at most 60 percent of the social workers adequately use SDM. The Self Assessment Report states: “. . . its use remains inconsistent and inaccurate.”
F21
Page 24
The SafeMeasures program has not been used adequately by many of the supervisors and managers. Usage is reportedly less than 20 percent.
F22
Page 24
Quality Assurance (QA) personnel are not knowledgeable in the use of all the software and were not using the SafeMeasures software to assess the quality of services provided.
F23
Page 24
The CPS in-take phone lines currently do not have recording capability. CPS personnel have investigated this issue and found that other counties have this capability and it did not interfere with reporting.
F24
Page 24
Testimony from CPS management indicates that social workers do not have electronic devices to record information while they are in the field.
F25
Page 24
Currently social workers, with password generation devices called “Tokens” (a secure means of handling sensitive data) can access the CWS/CMS computer system from home. CPS has issued about 80 of these “Tokens.”
F26
Page 25
Flaws in the SDM may result in children being exposed to dangerous and abusive conditions. The Risk Assessment process requires that CPS respond within 24 hours if a child is under age two. If the child is over two, the response time may be extended to ten days.
F27
Page 25
SDM is not been utilized as envisioned. Testimony indicated that this valuable risk assessment tool was frequently completed after the fact and viewed simply as an administrative “requirement” by social workers.
F28
Page 25
SDM allows a response of ten days even when there is a history of “physical abuse, domestic violence, caregiver mental health, or substance abuse concerns” if there is a “responsible” adult on the premises. Experts in domestic violence state that if there is domestic violence in the home there is a 50 percent chance that the children will also be abused. When these circumstances exist, no adult on the premises should be considered “responsible. “
F29
Page 25
The California Family Risk Assessment Tool can fail to adequately determine the level of risk to which a child may be exposed.
F30
Page 26
2: The CPS manual does not have a usable table of contents, index, or electronic search engine capability.
F31
Page 26
The law governing reporting does not require that the Mandated Reporter hold or detain a child suspected of being abused. It only requires that he or she report the suspected abuse to the proper authorities.
F32
Page 26
The Grand Jury does not have full access to unredacted reports for legitimate investigative purposes.
Recommendations 32
-
R1Page 181: The Board of Supervisors conduct a thorough assessment of the performance of HHS and CPS management. These administrators must demonstrate more than subject matter expertise. They must demonstrate an ability to ignite the enthusiasm of CPS supervisory and rank and file professionals and exhibit the creative energy and management skill necessary to lead CPS in the challenges ahead.
-
R2Page 18Greater transparency of CPS operations must be exhibited on the part of CPS management. They should do more to aggressively open the doors of CPS activities to the eyes of the public, the County Board of 19 Supervisors, non-profit organizations, K–12 schools and universities, the Legislature, the medical community, and the media. Transparency does not prevent possible negative publicity, but does mean that questions can be asked and answered in an atmosphere of openness and honesty. Evaluations
-
R3Page 19The completion of yearly evaluations on all employees must be recognized as a critical, high priority activity required of supervisors and managers.
-
R4Page 19HR must accept its responsibility for ensuring the completion of annual performance appraisals as part of their fundamental personnel oversight responsibilities.
-
R5Page 19CPS supervisory personnel must attend a training course specifically focused on employee performance evaluations
-
R6Page 20Greater interdepartmental cooperation must exist between CPS and the HR Department. CPS management must do more to demand and improve the delivery of services from the HR Department. Management attention and involvement must be brought to the table to reconcile this festering issue. Discipline Procedures
-
R7Page 201: CPS management should work with the Human Resources Department to immediately complete employee evaluations on all CPS personnel.
-
R8Page 201: Given the number of cases referred for discipline and the lengthy time until resolution, the Grand Jury recommends that more of the current HR staff be reallocated to CPS.
-
R9Page 21An alternative organizational structure, which would provide more efficient HR disciplinary support to CPS, should be considered.
-
R10Page 21HR should develop effective training seminars for all supervisors and managers of CPS to promote greater understanding of the requirements needed for a rapid adjudication of cases. Recruitment and Retention
-
R11Page 21CPS management should prepare an analysis of this turnover problem and implement a recommendation plan.
-
R12Page 21Establish a “specialist” classification in CPS available to social workers who are able to take on unique and complex cases. Training
-
R13Page 211: Program managers and supervisors must ensure that their employees attend classes and satisfy the 30-hour annual requirement.
-
R14Page 22CPS should review the training log for accuracy and corrects erroneous entries. Caseload
-
R15Page 221 CPS should define a case and establish caseload and workload criteria.
-
R16Page 22Tasks not needing the skills of a social worker should be turned over to support staff. Information Technology
-
R17Page 231: All CPS personnel should be required to pass software proficiency examinations.
-
R18Page 231: Division Managers should provide additional IRIS training and demand greater use of the software by program managers and supervisors. Program Information Notice 08-12, which provides detailed instructions of the use of IRIS, should be strictly followed.
-
R19Page 231: Changes should be made that will not allow deleting, but will require strikeouts and additional comments.
-
R20Page 24Social workers should be required to use SDM 100 percent of the time.
-
R21Page 241: All supervisors and management should receive additional training in the use of SafeMeasures.
-
R22Page 24QA personnel should receive training in the use of all CPS software and be required to use SafeMeasures in their assessment of CPS programs.
-
R23Page 24High priority should be given to purchasing and installing the voice recorder system as soon as possible.
-
R24Page 24CPS should investigate electronic devices that could improve social worker efficiency. Factors such as worker safety and client confidentiality should be considered.
-
R25Page 25This system should continue but annual reassessments should be conducted to evaluate its value, safety and security. Structured Decision Making and Risk Assessment Tools
-
R26Page 25The County should expand this age group to five and under. With this change in place any child who is not of school age would require 24-hour response.
-
R27Page 25Social workers should use the SDM tool as designed to adequately assess risk.
-
R28Page 25Whenever there is prior history of physical abuse or domestic violence, the response should be 24 hours or less.
-
R29Page 25CPS should reexamine this tool and find ways to improve its usage. 26 Policies and Procedures Manual
-
R30Page 26The CPS policy manual should be completely rewritten to include an index and expanded table of contents and be in digital form with electronic search capability. Legislative Needs
-
R31Page 261: The County Board of Supervisors should request the State Legislature amend the appropriate sections of the Penal Code to authorize such detention.
-
R32Page 261: The County Board of Supervisors should request the State Legislature amend Welfare and Institutions Code 827 to include the Grand Jury in the list of “Persons Authorized to View Juvenile Records without a Petition or Court Order.”