⚠️ Aviso de traducción:
Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected:
F3, F4, F5, F7
Findings and Recommendations
4 findings
"Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley, and the eastern portion of the County were added to the Permit in February 2019 and have a requirement to reduce trash discharges by 70%, from their 2016 baseline trash levels, by December 21, 2019." Response: The City of Antioch agrees with this finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
"The City/Town Councils of Antioch, Brentwood, Clayton, Danville, Moraga, Oakley, Orinda, Pleasant Hill, and San Ramon should consider limiting the use of Styrofoam containers in their communities by June 30, 2020." Response. The recommendation requires further analysis. The City of Antioch will need to fully analyze and evaluate the impacts of implementing this type of ordinance. As presented in the Grand Jury Report, trash comes in many different forms and from many different sources. Focusing on one specific source ban is not a feasible solution to achieve mandatory trash reduction requirements, or even potential credits, especially when its replacement could be discarded in the same manner. Like the Statewide plastic bag ban, single-use container bans, regardless of the material used, should be considered and addressed regionally or statewide. A standardized State ban would be far more effective than having ordinances implemented piecemeal, which could vary greatly from city to city. Because of limited staffing, resources, and a short timeline, the City cannot commit to a deadline of June 30, 2020, as recommended. Additionally, the current Municipal Regional storm water permit (MRP) expires in December 2020 and language for a new MRP is currently being negotiated, with a tentative implementation date of Spring 2021. Therefore, implementing and providing feedback on effectiveness for one specific trash source control measure in order to potentially receive trash reduction credits prior to the current MRP ending, is not feasible. It is also unclear if those same trash source control credits specifically for this source control measure will be carried into the new permit. The City has been participating in the new permit negotiations and will began evaluating available trash credits when they are ratified in the new MRP, which could include Styrofoam.
Both the CCCWP and LAFCO report that unfunded federal and state mandated stormwater permit compliance programs are a challenge for cities, towns, and the County." Response: The City of Antioch agrees with this finding. Phone: (925) 779-7011 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER 200 H Street Fax: (925) 779-7003 Antioch, CA. 94509 Antiochca.gov AntiochlsOpportunity.com
No recommendations for this finding
"Caltrans reports that highways and ramps along portions of Highways 4 and 24, Interstates 80, 580, and 680 in Antioch, El Cerrito, Richmond, and in the unincorporated areas of the County are high trash generation areas." Response: The City of Antioch partially disagrees with this finding. The Grand Jury Report references a table taken from the Caltrans, Trash Load Reduction Workplan for the San Francisco Bay Region, 2016, which indicated the locations of highway ramps with high trash levels; however, none of the ramps listed are within the City of Antioch. The Grand Jury Report also referenced a letter dated November 7, 2018, that was apparently co-signed by Antioch, urging the Water Board to take enforcement action against CalTrans; however, a copy of that letter could not be located and verified. While we understand and agree that trash can accumulate on highways and on/off ramps owned and operated by CalTrans, not all the facts of this finding apply to Antioch. The City is, however, pursuing a partnership with CalTrans to install trash capture devices in order to meet both agencies' reduction requirements.
No recommendations for this finding
"No narrative summary of the accomplishments, challenges, costs, and funds needed to fully comply with the Permit is provided in the required annual reports prepared by CCCWP, the County, and each city and town." Response: The City of Antioch partially disagrees with this finding. While Antioch agrees there is no narrative summary provided in the annual reports, there is also no provisional requirement to do so. More importantly, the annual report form is developed in collaboration with all 76 regional municipal stormwater permittees through the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA) and ultimately approved by the Water Board. Modifying the report format would require a majority consensus of all involved. The City of Antioch already presents a narrative summary covering those items during (1) the annual fiscal year budget period and (2) when establishing the Stormwater Utility Assessment (SUA), which is the mechanism for securing stormwater funding in Contra Costa County. II. RESPONSES TO GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS 2, 3, AND 4
No recommendations for this finding