Stanislaus County Grand Jury
• 2010-2011
Stanislaus County Civil Grand Jury Stanislaus County Audit Case #11-31gj
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 9 findings
F1
An Unqualified Opinion on the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report was obtained. 1
No recommendations for this finding
F2
An Unqualified Opinion on the Health Services Agency Audit was obtained.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
An Unqualified Opinion on the Inmate Welfare Audit was obtained.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
An Unqualified Opinion on the Regional 911 Audit was obtained.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
An Unqualified Opinion on the Redevelopment Agency Audit was obtained.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
An Unqualified Opinion on the Insurance Fraud Program was obtained.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
An Unqualified Opinion on the North County Corridor Transportation Expressway Authority was obtained.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
A Qualified Opinion on Federal Compliance over Major Federal Program and on Internal Control over Federal Compliance was obtained. Two instances of non-compliance were detected and two minor audit findings were reported. All four findings have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Stanislaus County Civil Grand Jury.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
In order to maintain the quality of compliance to accounting policies as reported in the 2010 Stanislaus County Audit, the Stanislaus County Auditor-Controller felt that the staffing level of thirty-three full time employees was the minimum number necessary to accomplish this. The staffing level of forty-three full time employees was in place during the last audit time period of July 2009 through June 2010.
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
– R8: The Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors should publicly recognize the outstanding efforts of the staff within the Stanislaus County Auditor- Controllers office.
R9
The Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors should carefully and critically analyze any recommendation to reduce staffing in the Stanislaus County Auditor-Controllers department. REQUESTS FOR RESPONSES: No responses required. This report of case #11-31GJ is issued by the 2010-2011 Stanislaus County Civil Grand Jury with the following exception: no members of the grand jury volunteered to recuse themselves due to a perceived conflict of interest. Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code § 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person, or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Civil Grand Jury. The California State Legislature has stated that it intends the provisions of Penal Code § 929 prohibiting disclosure of witness identities to encourage full candor in testimony in Civil Grand Jury investigations by protecting the privacy and confidentiality of those who participate in any Civil Grand Jury investigation 3