Ventura County Grand Jury • 2004-2005

East County Jail Closure

Published: June 29, 2005 6 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 33 findings

F01
The Sheriff’s Department and the Thousand Oaks Police Department share a facility at 2101 East Olsen Road in Thousand Oaks.
No recommendations for this finding
F02
The East County Jail is located within the shared facility.
No recommendations for this finding
F03
The shared facility, including the jail, was built under a joint agreement between Thousand Oaks and the Board of Supervisors in 1988.
No recommendations for this finding
F04
Budget reductions in FY2003-2004 led to the sheriff making the decision to convert the East County Jail from a 24-hour housing and booking facility to a 12-hour booking-only operation.
No recommendations for this finding
F05
Further budget reductions in FY2004-2005 led the sheriff to order the suspension of operations at the East County Jail, beginning in July 2004.
No recommendations for this finding
F06
Data provided by the Sheriff’s Department show that during the four year period FY1999-2000 thru FY2002-2003, when the East County Jail was fully operational, approximately 12% of all bookings were done at that facility.
No recommendations for this finding
F07
Data from the Sheriff’s Department show that during FY2003-2004, when the East County Jail was open for only 12 hours, approximately 11% of all bookings were done at that facility.
No recommendations for this finding
F08
From July 2004 until the present there have been no bookings at the East County Jail.
No recommendations for this finding
F09
Data from the Simi Valley Police Department show that during the four year period FY1999-2000 thru FY2002-2003, when the East County Jail was fully operational, approximately 67% of their bookings were done at that facility.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Data from the Simi Valley Police Department show that during FY2003- 2004, when the East County Jail was open for only 12 hours, approximately 49% of their bookings were done at that facility.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Data from the California Highway Patrol show that during the four year period CY2000 thru CY2003, when the East County Jail was fully operational, approximately 15% of their bookings were done at that facility.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
During the three year period between FY2002-2003 thru FY2004-2005 the Sheriff’s Department has reduced department staff by 196 people.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
During the 12 year period between FY1991-1992 thru FY2002-2003 the number of Sheriff’s Department personnel, funded with general purpose revenue, was relatively constant.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
During the two year period between FY2003-2004 thru FY2004-2005 the number of Sheriff’s Department personnel, funded with general purpose revenue, decreased by 27%.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
The Sheriff’s Department’s mandatory and statutory responsibilities are used to set priorities.
No recommendations for this finding
F16
The sheriff’s stated vision for the department is, “Make Ventura County the safest urban region in the United States.”
No recommendations for this finding
F17
Public safety is a key element of this community’s quality of life.
No recommendations for this finding
F18
The Sheriff’s Department’s published Mission Statement reads in part, “We, the members of the Ventura County Sheriff’s Department, are committed to safeguard lives and property of the residents of Ventura County….”
No recommendations for this finding
F19
Three programs that survived recent budget eliminations were the drug program, the air unit and the crime lab.
No recommendations for this finding
F20
In addition to staff reductions and the closing of the East County Jail, the Sheriff’s Department eliminated the following programs: • Sheriff’s Crime Suppression/Gang Unit • All unincorporated community oriented policing programs • All county area DARE programs • All county School Resource Officers • All county community storefront stations • One fraud/elder abuse investigator • One rural/agricultural crimes investigator • Three helicopters • The sheriff’s “honor farm” in Ojai • Court security positions
No recommendations for this finding
F21
The sheriff’s priorities, as stated in 2004, are: • Protect lifesaving and first responders programs • Focus efforts on criminal gangs, drug dealers and terrorists • Maintain quality of service in spite of reductions • Sustain infrastructure for future growth • Build toward restoration of desired services
No recommendations for this finding
F22
Twenty-two percent of the Sheriff’s Department budget for FY2004-2005 comes from contract cities (Camarillo, Fillmore, Moorpark, Ojai and Thousand Oaks).
No recommendations for this finding
F23
Forty-six percent of the Sheriff’s Department budget for FY2004-2005 comes from the county general fund.
No recommendations for this finding
F24
With the closure of the East County Jail, officers patrolling in the east end of the county must drive to the Main Jail to book a suspect.
No recommendations for this finding
F25
The distance between the Main Jail and the Simi Valley City Hall is approximately 40 miles.
No recommendations for this finding
F26
The distance between the Main Jail and the Thousand Oaks City Hall is approximately 24 miles.
No recommendations for this finding
F27
The time to drive from the east end of the county to the Main Jail, book a suspect, return to the east end and resume patrol duties is estimated to take two to two and a half hours.
No recommendations for this finding
F28
Deputies in the field have some discretion with respect to either booking a suspect or citing and releasing.
No recommendations for this finding
F29
There is no Sheriff’s Department policy to encourage citing and releasing suspects rather than booking to avoid the delay in transporting suspects to the Main Jail.
No recommendations for this finding
F30
Although they are the exception, there are instances when officers in the east end of the county cite and release, so as to avoid being off the street during the time necessary to book at the Main Jail.
No recommendations for this finding
F31
On April 5, 2005, the Board of Supervisors voted to settle lawsuits involving the Board, the Sheriff and the District Attorney. The lawsuit dealt with the provisions of Proposition 172 and Ordinance 4088.
No recommendations for this finding
F32
The settlement described above enables the sheriff to reopen the East County Jail.
No recommendations for this finding
F33
The Sheriff’s Department’s current plan is to reopen the jail during the peak 12 hours starting in September of this year and will make the facility fully operational early in 2006. Conclusions C-01. The Sheriff’s Department’s process in establishing priorities, in an environment of declining financial resources, was reasonable and prudent, and consistent with the department’s mandatory and statutory responsibilities. (F-04, F-05, F-15 thru F-18) C-02. The Sheriff’s Department’s decisions as to which staff members and programs were to be eliminated were consistent with the department’s priorities. (F-04, F-05, F-12, F-13, F-14, F-19, F-20, F-21, F-33) C-03. “Citing and releasing” of suspects so as to avoid booking in the Main Jail was being done by some deputies in the east county. (F-24 thru F-30) C-04. Keeping the East County Jail fully operational should continue to be a high priority. (F-01, F-02, F-03, F-06 thru F-11, F-30, F-22, F-31, F-32, F-33) Recommendations In light of the recent lawsuit settlement between the Board of Supervisors, the Sheriff and the District Attorney, which allows for the reopening of the East County Jail and the Sheriff’s decision to reopen it, the Grand Jury has no recommendation. Responses None required. (This page intentionally left blank)
No recommendations for this finding

Conclusions 1