Placer County Grand Jury • 2000-2001

The Juvenile Detention Center Background/Summary California Penal Code § 925 authorizes the Grand Jury to investigate

Published: February 20, 2001 4 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings and Recommendations 5 findings

F1
The external doors at the Juvenile Detention Center are secured with manual locks and keys, which creates the potential for delay in the event of emergency evacuations. Institute measures to allow quick, safe exit from the building in the event of life threatening emergencies, maintaining the safety and security of inmates, staff and the public at all times.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Institute measures to allow quick, safe exit from the building in the event of life threatening emergencies, maintaining the safety and security of inmates, staff and the public at all times.
F2
As noted in last year’s Grand Jury report, certain aspects of the facility’s construction may allow juveniles to harm themselves or others. Stairways have open railings. The handicapped lift has an easily accessed electrical control panel.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Find ways to reduce or mitigate these risks.
F3
While staffing levels meet the minimum requirements of California Code of Regulations Title 15, Crime Prevention and Corrections, they have not been adequate to ensure complete coverage of the facility’s needs at all times
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Juvenile Detention Center management should conduct an immediate analysis of staffing levels and male/female demographics in relation to the physical plant to ensure full-time, part-time and on-call staff are adequate at all times to meet the needs of youth housed in the facility.
F4
Juvenile Detention Center staff are not currently authorized to carry pepper spray as a defensive tool.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Grand Jury recommends that the draft policy authorizing the use of pepper spray by appropriately trained staff be approved and implemented as soon as possible.
F5
There is no inpatient treatment facility in Placer County for youth with mental health problems. The Grand Jury recommends that the Probation Department contract with appropriate institutions within Placer County to provide family centered services for children and youth under the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court who need residential treatment services for mental health problems. The Placer County Board of Supervisors should work to designate a facility within Placer County that meets these needs. Respondents Placer County Board of Supervisors Placer County Chief Probation Officer Placer County Executive Officer Placer County Juvenile Detention Center Director RESPONSE REQUIRED WITHIN 90 DAYS TO: The Honorable James D. Garbolino Presiding Judge, Superior Court County of Placer Historic Courthouse 101 Maple Street Auburn, CA 95603
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The Grand Jury recommends that the Probation Department contract with appropriate institutions within Placer County to provide family centered services for children and youth under the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court who need residential treatment services for mental health problems. The Placer County Board of Supervisors should work to designate a facility within Placer County that meets these needs. Respondents Placer County Board of Supervisors Placer County Chief Probation Officer Placer County Executive Officer Placer County Juvenile Detention Center Director

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Placer County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office