Santa Cruz County Grand Jury
• 2020-2021
• Agency Response
Grand Jury 7 Reminder: Report #10 Fire, #5 of 25 Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors - Immediate
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F4, F7, F8, F9, F17, F18, F25, F28
Findings and Recommendations 21 findings
F1
Page 4
Vegetation/fuel management and abatement are not receiving the attention nor funding needed from the County of Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors, and therefore are not adhering to California Government Executive Order 1.8.19-EO N-05-19 ....!_ AGREE _ . PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim?, Fire! Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Page 5
Santa Cruz County residents are at increased risk of fire danger due to the lack of risk management for wildfire. Specific risks are not formally identified, tracked, assessed for impact, nor is progress reported by fire departments in the County. Therefore, leaders responsible for budgets and accountability are left unprepared to manage risk, impact, or performance. _x_ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation {required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Page 6
City and County officials have not collaborated with PG&E to identify the location of high risk PG&E electrical equipment, and so are left uninformed as to how to manage their responsibilities or how to instruct residents about potential danger due to proximity to this equipment. X AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE-explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 of33 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Page 7
Santa Cruz County would greatly benefit if steps were taken to implement the CAL FIRE, San Mateo - Santa Cruz Unit 2018 recommendation of developing detailed, site specific Community Wildfire Protection Plans for communities throughout the County. � AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 of 33 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Page 8
Response time data for fire departments in Santa Cruz County is challenging to obtain. Santa Cruz Regional 9-1-1 previously reported response time data in their annual reports, but did not do so in the 2018 or 2019 annual reports ....X... AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation ( required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 of33 Ready? Aim? Fire! Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Page 9
Roadside vegetation in rural areas of the County is not being cleared consistently which could potentially increase emergency response time, putting life and property in unnecessary danger. Furthermore, evacuations could be restricted as there is no rule or program that mandates that roads, even critical evacuation routes, be kept cleared meeting defensible space requirements. _lL AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 Page Bof 33 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Branciforte Fire Protection District Board ofD irectors
Related Recommendations (1)
R10
Page 27
Santa Cruz County and Cities should create and/or update Hazard Mitigation Plans by July 1, 2021. Any new or existing plans should be updated a minimum of every three years. All plans should address wildfire risk, evacuation and shelter in place plans, emergency alerts, vegetation management, and o, confirm compliance with California SB 821. (F1, F2, F1 F11, F14-F16, F29) HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED - summarize what has been done HAS NOT BEEN IMPLEMENTED BUT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE FUTURE - summarize what will be done and the timeframe _lL REQUIRES FURTHER ANALYSIS - explain scope and timeframe (not to exceed six months) _ WILL NOT BE IMPLEMENTED -explain why Response explanation, summary, and timeframe: Those agencies that do not have Hazard Mitigation Plans should develop one and keep it updated. However, Branciforte Fire Protection District cannot speak regarding City and County Plan development and/or updates
F11
Page 10
There are only approximately 17,000 accounts for the Santa Cruz County opt-in CodeRED™ emergency system, which implies that a significant portion of the County may not receive emergency alert messages, which potentially reduces residents' opportunity to take action in a timely, life-saving manner . ..L AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 of33 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
Related Recommendations (1)
R11
Page 28
The CAL FIRE Ready for Wildfire website should be actively promoted and shared within the community via all available means, including printed descriptive materials inserted into utility and property tax bills, by December 31, 2020. (F19--F21) HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED -summarize what has been done HAS NOT BEEN IMPLEMENTED BUT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE FUTURE - summarize what will be done and the timeframe _K._ REQUIRES FURTHER ANALYSIS - explain scope and timeframe (not to exceed six months) _ WILL NOT BE IMPLEMENTED -explain why Response explanation, summary, and timeframe: Branciforte Fire Protection District would need to investigate the process of including printed materials being inserted into utility and property tax bills, including the associated costs. This should be a unified, county-wide effort and thus, coordinated with all agencies and utilities serving the areas on Santa Cruz County.
F12
Page 11
Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADs), have been deployed in other areas of the state and have proven effective tools in alerting residents in urban and rural areas to a wildfire. However, Santa Cruz County has no such devices, increasing the risk to County residents . ...JL AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire! Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F13
Page 12
High risk communities in the County are left unnecessarily vulnerable due to the lack of easily accessible, published information of refuge/assembly areas and structures. x_ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F14
Page 13
Because the County does not publish a "shelter in place" plan, when a fire expands rapidly, residents cannot make informed decisions about whether to shelter in place or evacuate . .JL_ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree}: Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire! Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F15
Page 14
Unlike the City of Santa Cruz, the County does not publish emergency evacuation routes, purportedly to avoid having old or untimely information being followed in an emergency. The County therefore withholds revealing evacuation routes until an emergency is in progress, likely creating unnecessary risk and potential for chaos. AGREE _x__ PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Fire behavior is dynamic and changes rapidly. A set published evacuation route may not be a feasible or recommended route during a large wildland incident Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire! Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F16
Page 15
In the Wildland Urban Interface zone, and in many town centers, traffic choke points exist, and in some instances have roadway obstacles to traffic flow such as overgrown vegetation, concrete medians, curbs, and lane reductions resulting in roads that are inadequate for mass evacuations. ___..!._ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree}: Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F19
Page 16
Wildfire preparedness informational materials are well done and public education is attempted by fire departments in the County, but fails to sufficiently reach and motivate residents to act. _.lL AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire! Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F20
Page 17
The FireWise institution provides a valuable fire prevention program and, as of March 2020, there were eight FireWise communities registered in the County. Marin County, by contrast, with a similar population, has sixty registered communities, highlighting the need for more FireWise promotion and participation in Santa Cruz County . ..x_ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F21
Page 18
The County Office of Emergency Services and fire agencies in the County encourage residents to be prepared for an emergency, however the passive mechanisms such as web sites used to encourage preparedness are not proving to be sufficient. ..1L. AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE -explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire! Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F22
Page 19
Property owners in the County are responsible for their own vegetation management, yet they are often not sufficiently educated about vegetation management practices, or do not have the capability, financial resources, or desire to create defensible space. _K._ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree}: Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F23
Page 20
No single organization in the County is assuming a leadership role in Fire Hazard Mitigation. It is not clear whose responsibility it is to minimize this County wide risk. � AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire! Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F24
Page 21
The annual report to the County Board of Supervisors and the County Administrative Office by County Fire/CAL FIRE does not provide data or analysis of resources, response times, code enforcement, inspection, or education. This information is necessary to show what gaps exist between current performance and community needs in order for informed budget decisions to be made. Without adequate background information, the Board of Supervisors is unable to hold CAL FIRE accountable for the specific responsibilities specified in their contract. AGREE _lL PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): The Branciforte Fire District is not a party to the Contract between Cal FIRE and the County of Santa Cruz. The items specified above in F24 are within the Santa Cruz County Fire Department jurisdiction and not Branciforte Fire District. Response Required by October 1, 2020 of33 Ready? Aim? Fire/ Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F26
Page 22
Reporting data, statistics, and formats utilized by fire agencies throughout the County are highly inconsistent, uncoordinated, and therefore not readily evaluated and compared. The standard Insurance Services Office (ISO) rating system would be useful to adopt. Response time data are not well described or consistently reported by the jurisdictions, making accurate assessment difficult, especially by other agencies or by the public. _x_ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE - explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 Ready? Aim? Fire! Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F27
Page 23
The 2015 County of Santa Cruz Emergency Operations Management plan does not adequately address evacuation, and references data too outdated to be useful, such as a population density map from the 2000 census . ...x__ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 of33 Ready? Aim? Fire! Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding
F29
Page 24
The Grand Jury finds that formally specified baseline and target performance statements, in alignment with the Center for Public Safety Excellence Assessment Process, neither currently exist nor are they reported by fire departments in the County as required by best practice standards. There are no goals set or measures made of progress for review by the Board of Supervisors regarding County Fire/CAL FIRE performance. Other fire districts in the County are similarly remiss in reporting to their governing bodies. Appropriate goals would include progress on response times, vegetation management, and code inspection progress, all of which are necessary to properly quantify the budget and resources required for full-time, volunteer, and prison inmate workforces, in appropriate, affordable proportions. _x__ AGREE _ PARTIALLY DISAGREE -explain the disputed portion _ DISAGREE - explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Response Required by October 1, 2020 of 33 Ready? Aim? Fire! Branciforte Fire Protection District Board of Directors
No recommendations for this finding