📋

Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Placer County Grand Jury • 2017-2018

Response to the Placer County Grand Jury 2017-2018 Final Report California Public Records Act

Published: September 30, 2018 7 pages

View PDF View Full Original

⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings 4 findings

F1 Page 34

PCSO received two faxes they did not interpret as CPRA requests;

F2 Page 34

PCSO did not assist in identifying which records the faxes were attempting to request as required by Government Code §6253.1(a): “Assist the member of the public to identify records and information that are responsive to the request or to the purpose of the request, if stated”;

F3 Page 34

PCSO currently attaches written requests considered to be valid CPRA requests to the case file; and

F4 Page 34

There is no method for tracking phone requests.

Recommendations 5

R1
Page 34

Review all incoming correspondence, and if not considered a valid request, assist the requester in identifying which records are being requested in compliance with the CPRA.
R2
Page 34

Acknowledge all requests received in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the CPRA.
R3
Page 34

Ensure compliance with the ten-day deadline required by the CPRA. The Grand Jury recommends that Placer County:
R4
Page 34

Identify a public records request coordinator within each department.
R5
Page 34

Establish a centralized, countywide tracking system for all verbal, written, phone, and faxed public records requests. This recommendation is for a tracking system and not a single point for submitting or responding to requests. This was also recommended in the 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report. Response to -2018 Final Report