📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
Kings County Grand Jury
• 2015-2016
an estimated monthly maintenance cost of $2,000 - $5,000, depending
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 3 findings
F1
Page 135
The Grand Jury finds that there is a strong disconnect in communication between the Hanford City Departments and the Commissions to which they report. The Parks and Recreation Department focused solely on budgetary issues in regards to Freedom Park during the Capital Improvement Budget planning process in 2014.
F2
Page 135
When Freedom Park was completed in 2007, the estimated life of the rubberized matting was expected to be seven to ten years, at which time the city would have to replace the material. However, no long-term budget plans were created to cover the cost of this replacement.
F3
Page 136
The Grand Jury finds the quick action of the Hanford City Council in halting the demolition stage of the Freedom Park rubber matting to be commendable.
Recommendations 3
-
R1Page 135With the uniqueness of Freedom Park and the public drive to get the rubberized matting, more information should have been presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission prior to approval of the project. The Grand Jury recommends that City Departments be more forthcoming with information presented to the Commissions, specifically in areas with high public interest.
-
R2Page 135None. The City of Hanford has corrected this discrepancy with the establishment of “Legacy Funding” in the budget for future replacement needs of the rubberized matting.
-
R3Page 136None COMMENTS The Grand Jury thanks all those interviewed during the course of this investigation. The Grand Jury was impressed at the speed in which the project was halted, solutions for a correction presented and the final determination of the Hanford City Council.