Nevada County Grand Jury
• 2015-2016
• Agency Response
Board of Supervisols' Responses to the 201 5- 16 Nevada County Civri Granci Jury Report, Curi F
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F1
The average daily cost of housing detainees in Juvenile Hallfor Fiscal Year 201,4-15 averaged 5377 per day or 5t37 ,+8t per year, per detainee. Agree
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Bythe end of Fiscal Year 2016-17, the Nevada County Board ofSupervisors and the Nevada County Probation Department, in collaboration with the Nevada County Superior Court and other stakeholders, should negotiate a contract at the lowest rate possible for all of Nevada County's juvenile detention needs with neighboring county juvenile facilities to reduce Nevada County's general fund costs. The reconnmendation wi!l not be implemented at the present time. The County believes the benefit to house Nevada County youth locally in our therapeutic rich and proven environment compared to neighboring facilities that do not value such a rehabilitative vision supersedes the cost benefit philosophy. Resolution No. 00-427, dated September 5, 2000, passed by the Nevada County Board of Supervisors, to receive the Construction Grants Program Grant Contract between the State Board of Corrections and County of Nevada, funding to build the Carl F. Bryan ll Juvenile Hall stipulates in Exhibit D, page L of 4, "The Grantee assures and certifies that it: will not dispose of, modify the use of, or change the terms of the real property title, or other interest in the site or facilities, or lease the facility for operation by other entities, without permission and instructions from the Office of Juvenile Programs, U.5. Department of Justice."
F2
Decreasing numbers of local detainees are housed in the facility. Agree
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Once favorable contract arrangements with neighboring county juvenile facilities are secured, the Nevada County Board of Supervisors and the Nevada County Probation Department, in collaboration with the Nevada County Superior Court and all other stakeholders, should study and determine the cost effectiveness of alternative uses for the current Carl F. Bryan ll Regional Juvenile Hall and repurpose all of the facility for other public programs and services. The recommendation will not be implemented at the present time. Resolution No. 00-427, dated September 5,2OOO, passed by the Nevada County Board of Supervisors, to receive the Construction Grants Program Grant Contract between the State Board of Corrections and County of Nevada, funding to build the Carl F. Bryan ll Juvenile Hall stipulates in Exhibit D, page L of 4, "The Grantee assures and certifies that it: will not dispose of, modify the use of, or change the terms of the real property title, or other interest in the site or facilities, or lease the facility for operation by other entities, without permission and instructions from the Office of Juvenile Programs, U.S. Department of Justice."
F3
Regardless of the decreasing number of detainees, overall costs of Juvenile Hall are not commensurably reduced because of the high cost of Title 15 mandated staffing. Agree
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Contracting for Nevada County's juvenile detention needs with a neighboring county juvenile facility is estimated to be approximately 65% less expensive maintaining a full service juvenile hall in Nevada County. Partially Agree Statement F4 does not take into account the cost and impact to the overall budget of the probation department to pay for a Deputy Probation Officer to transport to and from the neighboring county facility at time of booking and for scheduled court appearances. Added, the cost of staff time for Deputy Probation Officers to travel to and from neighboring county facilities to interview youth.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Substantial savings forthe county general fund wor"rld be achieved by closing iu,renile Hall and contracting with a neighboring county for detention of Nevao'a County detainees. Agree B. RESPONSES TO RECOMMENDATIONS
No recommendations for this finding