📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 5 findings
F1
Page 19
That MAC members were not aware of the availability or the process for MACs to receive financial support to conduct business.
F2
Page 19
That not all MACs receive annual training regarding the Ralph M. Brown Act and parliamentary procedures.
F3
Page 19
That the Merced County website does not provide current information about all MACs.
F4
Page 19
That MAC members need to collaborate with other council members in the county.
F5
Page 19
That members of the Merced County Municipal Advisory Councils are to be commended for their ongoing work and commitment to the betterment of their respective communities. 20
Recommendations 4
-
R1Page 20That the Board of Supervisors (or their designee) review and communicate county procedures to MAC members for reimbursement of business expenses.
-
R2Page 20That the Board of Supervisors (or their designee) provide training annually for all MAC members to ensure compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act. Training should also include parliamentary procedures in conducting meetings.
-
R3Page 20That the Merced County Board of Supervisors (or their designee) establish a procedure to ensure that the MAC website is maintained with current information.
-
R4Page 20That the Merced County Planning Department schedule semi-annual collaboration meetings with MAC members. REQUEST FOR RESPONSE(S) Pursuant to Penal Code Section 933.05, the following responses are required: • Merced County Board of Supervisors respond to F1-F4 and R1-R4