📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 13 findings
F1
Page 25
Generally, the YHCP has adopted and uses acceptable accounting practices as cited in the audit.
F2
Page 25
The loan to the YHC from the Yolo County Treasury has an outstanding balance of $1,767.00.
F3
Page 25
At the printing of this report, the Yolo Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan has been released for public comment.
F4
Page 36
The lack of regular structured communication between the County cities, CDPs, unincorporated areas, transportation agencies and districts has prevented input to pool resources and ideas and assist in a timelier completion of the Plan.
F5
Yolo County HR manages harassment and ethics online training courses for all employees to comply with Federal and State laws. These outdated and repetitious trainings are found to be inadequate and ineffective.
F6
The CAO conducts a 360-degree evaluation for all appointed Department heads. This evaluation process currently excludes elected officials.
F7
The Yolo County Board of Supervisors has not provided supervision or monitoring of elected county officials as directed by the California State Government Code Section 25303.
F8
The Assessor/Clerk-Recorder/Registrar of Voters office has taken steps to implement a Corrective Action Plan in 2016 as directed by the County Auditor to the interim “appointed” Assessor/Clerk-Recorder/Registrar of Voters as of April 29, 2016.
F9
The Election office staff made purchases outside the County’s policies and procedures according to the Finance Procurement staff. It was noted that the purchases were made at the direction of the EO under a general rule of “if you need it, get it.”
F10
Electronic equipment, purchased by the Election staff, was not included in the General Service Department’s inventory. Tracking would have facilitated accountability, program updates, replacements and recyclability.
F11
Although Independent Living Skills classes are described as valuable and relevant by both Child Welfare staff and extended foster youth interviewed for this report, few youths over 18 actually attend the classes.
F12
Extended foster care youth gain valuable real-world experience in making and sticking to a budget when they are given the responsibility for managing their monthly foster care payment.
F13
The Yolo County Board of Supervisors needs to address and correct traffic safety issues along Yolo Avenue in Esparto for Esparto Unified District students accessing all campuses.
Recommendations 11
-
R1Page 25By September 1, 2017, the remaining balance of the loan from the Yolo County Treasury is to be repaid to Yolo County.
-
R2Elected officials and all employees shall be trained in appropriate use of County property and equipment, not limited to purchase cards, cell phones, computers, etc.
-
R3All authorized County purchased equipment shall be issued with an inventory tag. All electronic equipment shall be purchased through the General Services department and inventoried annually.
-
R4The CAO and HR Director shall review and revise the County’s mandated training requirements and compliance with the State of California Public Services Entities as directed by the AB 1234 timeline. 17 2016 – 2017 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT: INVESTIGATIONS YOLO COUNTY ELECTIONS OFFICE INDISCRETIONS & CULPABILITY
-
R5The Departments of Administration and Financial Services along with the Department of Human Resources shall create a standardized training for County Policies and Procedures to ensure all administrators, supervisors, directors, and department heads, elected or appointed, are familiarized with current Federal and State laws and County government policies and procedures. An annual review of all new policies and procedures shall be conducted for elected officials and all employees, and records ensuring compliance shall be kept.
-
R6The Department of Financial Services shall provide training to all accounting personnel in policies and procedures related to accounts payable and receivable and all department contracts.
-
R7The Department of Financial Services shall create records to ensure compliance of the employees who are required to attend training in financial practices.
-
R8The Department of Human Resources shall ensure that all job titles within the County Assessor/Clerk-Recorder/Registrar of Voters office have job descriptions and that all current and future employees have titles complete with job descriptions and responsibilities. The Elections Office, in collaboration with HR, shall review and revise the evaluation standards used for all current and future job classifications to establish a fair and objective set of guidelines.
-
R9The Department of Human Resources shall annually review hiring practices to eliminate instances of nepotism within all departments to ensure that ethical standards are maintained and that a procedural firewall exists between familial related employees. This annual review shall be presented to the Board of Supervisors with findings and recommendations no later than December 1, 2018, and each following year.
-
R10By December 1, 2018, HR shall review and update the Harassment and Ethics online training programs and implement a training program that includes classroom (in-person) training.
-
R11Prior to the 2017 evaluations, the CAO shall revise and extend the current 360-degree evaluation process to include all elected officials and department heads.
Conclusions 2
-
CL1Extended Foster Care smooths the pathway to adulthood for Yolo County foster youth ages 18-21. Extended Foster Care youth attend school, are employed, manage their own money, and engage in practical activities geared toward independent living. By allowing the youth to exit out of and re- enter care, these young people experience the natural consequences of choices and decisions without losing needed support. The continued time in care gives program participants breathing room to gain important decision-making skills, benefit from positive adult relationships, and increase self-sufficiency. Three years have passed since the Extended Foster Care program was expanded to age 21. The fact that almost all Yolo County foster youth have opted to stay in the system is a testament to the law and to the professionalism and dedication of the program’s social workers and probation officers. Upon turning 18, these vulnerable young people are less likely to face futures of economic instability, educational deficits, homelessness, and mental health issues. To the question, “Has Extended Foster Care improved the outcomes for youth participating in the program?” The Yolo County Grand Jury answers, “Yes.” 45 2016 – 2017 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT: INVESTIGATIONS CALIFORNIA CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT: A BETTER BRIDGE TO ADULTHOOD FOR YOLO COUNTY’S FOSTER YOUTH
-
CL2In response to the Findings and Recommendations published in the 2015-2016 Grand Jury Final Report, this summary of responses documents the comments received and the measures taken by the investigated parties and governing bodies. Agency and individual comments were timely and thorough in observance of statutory requirements and were in the spirit of cooperation with the Grand Jury. Of the 18 Recommendations contained within the 2015-2016 Report, 11 will be implemented, two were already implemented, two will not be implemented, two were deemed not to be warranted, and one required further analysis. The negative responses stated the underlying reason(s) for the agency’s or individual’s non-implementation of the Recommendation. The potential benefit of the implemented recommendations demonstrates that the Yolo County Grand Jury continues to serve as a useful agent for positive change. BIBLIOGRAPHY 2015-2016 Yolo County Grand Jury Final Report, June 30, 2015: http://www.yolocounty.org/business/community/grand-jury/yolo-county-grand-jury-reports Responses to 2015-2016 Yolo County Grand Jury Reports (also posted on the web page above) Yolo County Response to “The Yolo County Health and Human Services Department: Personnel Practices” Yolo County Response to “Wild Wings County Service Area: Management and Service Concerns” Yolo County Response to “Yolo County Sheriff’s Office Detention Facility Review” 83 2016 - 2017 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT APPENDIX: RESPONSES TO THE 2016 -2017 FINAL REPORT CONTINUITY REPORT FOR THE 2015-16 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JURY Office of the Yolo County Sheriff Response to “Yolo County Sheriff’s Office Detention Facility Review” Yolo County Response to “Yolo Habitat Conservancy: A Never-Ending Story” Yolo Habitat Conservancy Response to “Yolo Habitat Conservancy: A Never- Ending Story” City of Davis Response to “Yolo Habitat Conservancy: A Never-Ending Story” City of West Sacramento Response to “Yolo Habitat Conservancy: A Never-Ending Story” City of Woodland Response to “Yolo Habitat Conservancy: A Never-Ending Story” Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code Section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Civil Grand Jury. 84 2016 - 2017 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT APPENDIX: RESPONSES TO THE 2016 -2017 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX RESPONSES TO THE 2016 - 2017 FINAL REPORT
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Yolo County
County