This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F9, F10, F11, F12, F13, F14, F15, F16, F17, F18, F19, F20, F21, F22, F23, F24, F25, F26, F27, F28, F29, F30, F31, F32, F33, F34, F35, F36, F37, F38
Findings 9 findings
Recommendations 7
-
R1The YCPD Policy Manual should be completely • Yolo County Probation Department: Recom- revised and distributed to all employees by July 1, mendations R1, R2, R3, R4 and R6 2013. • Yolo County Human Resources Department:
-
R2The Probation Department should designate a Recommendations R3, R4 and R5 position to be in charge of the training program to ensure that employees have the necessary From the following individual: skills to properly perform the duties of their job in compliance with the Mission Statement and to • Yolo County CAO: Recommendations R5 and R6 meet the goals of the YCPD.
-
R3All employees in the Probation Department need diSClAiMeR to be evaluated on an annual basis. A follow up system needs to confirm that the reviews are This report was issued by the Grand Jury with completed. the exception of one member who may have had a perceived conflict of interest. This juror was excluded
-
R4The format and purpose of employee reviews from all parts of the investigation, including interviews, should be made clear to all employees. inspections, deliberations, and the preparation and acceptance of this report.
-
R5The HR Department should implement periodic interviews with staff and supervisors to determine employee morale and their concerns about the office environment in the Probation Department. This information should be shared with the CAO, Chief Probation Officer and Assistant Chief Pro- bation Officer.
-
R6YCPD management should conduct follow-up interviews with YCPD staff to determine if the workplace environment and morale have been improved. 19 2011–2012 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt dunnigan Fire protection with Section 33000) of the Health and Safety Code, or a joint powers agency created pursuant to Chapter district 5 (commencing with Safety Code Section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, and, in addition to any other investigatory powers granted
-
R08-77Section 2c (i)). The WIB membership application YC has a farm based economy. Testimony showed form does not screen for “optimum policy making or that no effort has been made to recruit members from hiring authority”. agribusiness. Certification of the WIB Quorum at Board Meetings All WIB’s in California were subject to Due to a lack of quorum at previous meetings, recertification in December 2010 by the California the January 2012 agenda packet was 62 pages, much WIB. Recertification depended on the achievement of which was previously un-ratified business. Minutes of performance standards for employment of adults, are not immediately available due to lack of quorum to dislocated workers, and youth, a showing that the WIB ratify minutes. had carried out its mandated functions and complied with the membership requirements of the WIB. The In 2010, the WIB lacked a quorum for two meetings WIB was required to explain any vacant positions. out of six and in 2011 attendance fell short of a quorum four out of six meetings. The current Board has con- In October 2010, the Yolo County WIB responded sidered increasing the meetings from bi-monthly to to the State, reporting six members short of the required monthly in the hope of increasing commitment among business member majority. In explanation, the YC WIB its members. However, monthly meetings in 2009 also noted that the vacancy times “vary due to the downturn fell short of a quorum half the time. in the economy resulting in business closures, and the expiration of term dates”. The need to recruit business One Stop Oversight members was recognized and a recruitment strategy including “current board members reaching out to their The WIB is granted responsibilities for the One business association contacts with the intent of having Stops. In its recertification request, the WIB certified a business majority by the end of fiscal year 2010” was that it performs mandated functions including “Program indicated. oversight: The WIB provides guidance and oversight by establishing local policies for the One Stops, with The YC WIB was recertified by the California focus on responsiveness to community and changing Workforce Investment Board in December 2010. economic conditions”. However, because a majority of business members was lacking, the WIB is subject to continued reporting The Grand Jury determined that the WIB is often requirements, including a recommendation to provide a the passive recipient of information provided by the 27 2011–2012 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt One Stop operators, rather than the initiator of policy. F8. Attracting business members to the Workforce Investment Board is a long standing issue in Yolo DESS combines employment and social services County. The WIB has not provided a timeline at the One Stops. While the availability of these social for recruiting business members nor have WIB services is a boon to the One Stops’ job seekers, members actively recruited from the business Board members acknowledge it does contribute to the community. misperception on the part of business that the One Stop has little to offer the business community. ReCoMMendAtionS The One Stops’ current promotional packet advertises an “employer hot-line”. Despite the WIB’s R1. The WIB should create linkages with the business stated intent to reach out to business, witnesses community and enlist aid from cities, Chambers interviewed by the Grand Jury had no knowledge of of Commerce and the Yolo County Board of what the “employer hot-line” was or what it did. Supervisors to support their marketing efforts to increase public and business awareness of the WIB while increasing the WIB’s connection to FindinGS the business community. F1. The general public and some businesses may not R2. WIB members should actively recruit members be aware of the services of the WIB and One Stop from businesses, including agribusiness. Career Centers. R3. The WIB application for business membership F2. The WIB has not actively recruited agribusiness should be revised to screen for “optimum policy to the Board. making or hiring authority”. F3. The WIB business members are not screened R4. WIB members should tour and receive an for having “optimum policy making or hiring orientation to the One Stops in both Woodland authority”. and West Sacramento by December 31, 2012. F4. New WIB members do not receive formal R5. The WIB should provide the State with a timeline orientation to legislative mandates, program for recruiting business members by December 31, operations or One Stop tours. 2012. F5. The business members of the WIB do not take an R6. Member absences from WIB meetings should be active role in establishing policy, but rather, are reviewed. Absent members should be contacted the recipients of information provided by the One to determine their interest in continuing with the Stop Career Centers. WIB. F6. Ratification of WIB actions have been delayed R7. WIB should provide services to unemployed due to the lack of a quorum at many scheduled individuals of any economic status by marketing board meetings. the on-line career services of the One Stops. F7. The WIB has not recommended removal of R8. The WIB should circulate informational minutes any members for absences of three or more, as to keep WIB members informed and interested. permitted by their by-laws. 28 2011–2012 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt GloSSARY ReQueSt FoR ReSponSe DESS: Department of Employment and Social Services Pursuant to Penal Code Sections 933(c) and 933.05, the Grand Jury requests responses as follows: Dislocated Workers: Laid off or terminated workers From the following governing bodies: EDD: California Employment Development Depart- ment • Yolo County Board of Supervisors: Recommen- dations R1 and R6 One Stop: Created by the WIA with oversight from the WIB and is operated in Yolo County by the DESS to • Department of Employment & Social Services provide employment assistance to employers and job Director: Recommendation R4 seekers Virtual One Stop: Internet site for employment assis- From the following individual: tance • Workforce Investment Board Chair: Recommen- WIA: Workforce Investment Act (Federal), August dations R1 through R8 1998 WIB: Workforce Investment Board, Yolo County estab- lished March 2000 29 2011–2012 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt 30 2011–2012 Yolo CountY GRA2n01d1 J–u2R0Y1 F2in YAoll oR eCpoouRntt/YA GpRpAennddi JXu: RRYe SFpinoAnlS ReeSp tooR ttHe 2010–2011 FinAl RepoRt