📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
Los Angeles County Grand Jury
• 2016-2017
8. Transforming the Lives of Homeless Veterans Living in Los Angeles County
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Recommendations 15
-
R1Page 91Metro should consider strategies that are effective against “triple-convergence” in support of its ridership goals.
-
R2Page 92Metro should continue producing high-quality First/Last Mile planning documents.
-
R3Page 92Metro should take responsibility for the quality of the resulting (from 2. above) First/Last Mile implementations.
-
R4Page 93Metro should deal with more site-specific design problems in their First/Last Mile planning documents.
-
R5Page 93Metro should further extend its influence over communities for First/Last Mile implementations with more extensive collaboration and funding.
-
R6Page 93Metro should budget more of its funding stream to First/Last Mile implementation (see 5, above).
-
R7Page 93Metro should explicitly include First/Last Mile design considerations beginning at the earliest stage of its system expansion designs.
-
R8Page 93Metro should formalize actual user reviews for refurbishments and new developments.
-
R9Page 93Metro should use safety data from existing terminals as the highest priority consideration for refurbishments.
-
R10Page 93Metro should expand and make consistent the pedestrian and bicycle facilities at each terminal.
-
R11Page 93Metro should encourage or require First/Last Mile designs that constrain automobile speeds and maximally separate vehicle routes and pedestrian and bicycle paths in terminal footprint areas.
-
R12Page 93Metro should further develop bicycle usage policies to/on/from Metro and First/Last Mile support for bicyclists.
-
R13Page 93Metro should explicitly provide for the use of accessory items on trains – rolling carts, baby carriages, etc.
-
R14Page 93Metro should anticipate the development of potential new accessories and assists within First/Last Mile plans and implementations.
-
R15Page 93Metro should plan for Uber/Lyft/A-Car ports at Metro terminal. 88 2016-2017 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT VI RESPONSES REQUESTED California Penal Code Sections 933(c) and 933.05 require a written response to all recommendations contained in this report. Responses shall be made no later than ninety (90) days after the Civil Grand Jury publishes its report and files it with the Clerk of the Court. Responses shall be made in accord with Penal Code Sections 933.05 (a) and (b). All responses to the recommendations of the 2016-2017 Civil Grand Jury must be submitted on or before September 30, 2017, to: Presiding Judge Los Angeles County Superior Court Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center 210 West Temple Street Eleventh Floor-Room 11-506 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Responses are required from: Responding Agency Recommendations Metro 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.10, 7.11, 7.12, 7.13, 7.14, 7.15. VII ACRONYMS A-Car Autonomous Car ADA Americans with Disabilities Act ATSP Active Transit Strategic Plan CGJ 2016-2017 Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury VIII COMMITTEE MEMBERS Douglas Benedict Chair Ronnie Dann-Honor Lucy Eisenberg Shelley Strohm 2016-2017 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT 89 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 90 2016-2017 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT