📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Plumas County Grand Jury • 2004-2005

Plumas County

Published: June 15, 2005 10 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 11 findings

F1 Page 10
During the interviews and early tours of the jail facility, it became apparent to this Grand Jury that communication regarding jail conditions between the Plumas County Jail, the Plumas County Sheriff's Department, the Plumas County Facility 7 Services Department, and the Plumas County Board of Supervisors was inadequate. There is no written system or follow-up procedure in place to ensure that maintenance problems be attended to in a timely manner.
F2 Page 11
The jail facility is annually inspected by the local Fire Warden and the Grand Jury, and is inspected biennially by the California Board of Corrections. This Grand Jury found that the small repairs recommended by these agencies' inspections were eventually taken care of, but the more serious repairs that were required have been brushed off with statements of "not my responsibility", "waiting for someone to get back to me", and "waiting for bids".
F3 Page 11
There are serious security issues at the jail facility which compromise the safety of not only the Sheriff's Department staff and jail detainees, but also the citizens of Plumas County. Issues of concern are: a. There is no perimeter fence around the jail thus allowing members of the public direct access to the exercise yards. Items could be left for inmates or yard fencing could be cut to facilitate an escape. b. The doors to access the main electrical breakers that provide power to the facility are unsecured allowing for a complete shutdown of power to the jail. c. The jail facility is understaffed.
F4 Page 11
There are some security and maintenance issues that have been present for a number of years, as has been noted in past Grand Jury reports, and have still not been corrected: a. The Control Room still contains a crowded maze of wires piled up on the floor which according to jail staff occasionally emit sparks and smoke. b. There are no slots in the maximum security cell doors for the passage of food trays and other items requiring the jail staff to come in direct contact with the maximum security inmates. c. There is no automated lock-in control when moving inmates from one cell to another.
F5 Page 11
The Plumas County Board of Supervisors is aware of the unsafe and potentially dangerous conditions that exist at the jail, but most appear apathetic. The Board appears to have ignored its responsibility where the jail is concerned and seems satisfied with passing all of the responsibility onto the Sheriff's Department. At the time of this report's completion, no member of the Board had yet implemented the 2003-4 Grand Juries’ recommendation to visit the jail facility at least once yearly.
F6 Page 11
The Sheriff and the Undersheriff (overseer of the jail facility) appear to ignore, deny, or be unwilling to accept the responsibility for any maintenance, repairs, or remedial work and are complacent, relying and acquiescing to the Facility Services Department. 8
F7 Page 12
The Automatic Fire Sprinkler System is in disrepair. There is no regard for these conditions by the Facility Services Department, the Sheriff's Department or the jail personnel. The Office of the State Fire Marshal noted the following deficiencies: a. The sprinkler system inspection is past due for its required five (5) year servicing. b. The facility does not have any records showing that the sprinkler system is tested and inspected quarterly as required. c. The Corporal's office does not have fire sprinkler coverage.
F8 Page 12
The following additional deficiencies with the Sprinkler System were noted either in the above mentioned inspection reports or by personal observations made during this Jury's three (3) tours of the facility: a. There is no contract for the five (5) year required servicing and certification of the sprinkler system. b. There is no contract for the quarterly inspection of the sprinkler system. c. An eighteen (18) inch minimum clearance around the sprinkler heads is not maintained in the nurse's office, the library, the laundry corridor, or the file room. d. The sprinkler repair kit in the cleaning closet is not accessible. e. No fire watches were performed or fire watch logs maintained while the fire alarms system was not functioning. f. No fire drill procedure is in place nor is a fire drill log maintained. g. There are times when there is no deputy on duty who meets the training standards for general fire safety relating to the jail facility. h. The exterior sprinkler system alarm is not connected. i. The exterior sprinkler system electrical plug is covered over with duct tape. j. The exterior sprinkler activation alarm bell is not connected. k. The exterior sprinkler system valve is not working. l. No locking device is installed on the sprinkler system shut-off valve. m. The work furlough day room does not have fire sprinkler coverage. n. The work furlough sleeping area does not have fire sprinkler coverage
F9 Page 12
Using the above mentioned inspection reports, as well as personal observations made during this Grand Jury's three (3) tours of the facility, the following list of deficiencies with the jail facility's electrical system was compiled: 9 a. Extension cords are being used as permanent wiring in the control room and the air handler room. b. Wiring on the floor in the control room is not in conduit. c. Exposed wiring in the wall of the control room is not in conduit. d. An EXIT light in the minimum security corridor is missing. e. An EXIT light in the main security corridor is missing. f. There are exposed junction boxes in the air handler room. g. There is an exposed junction box in a cell.
F10 Page 13
The following list of miscellaneous deficiencies with the jail facility was compiled by this Grand Jury using the above mentioned inspection reports as well as personal observations made during this Grand Jury's three (3) tours of the facility: a. There are holes in the wall and ceiling in the air handler room. b. There is a hole in the ceiling in the North Minimum holding cell. c. There is a hole in the wall in the work furlough sleeping area. d. There is an air diffuser missing in the laundry corridor. e. Weed abatement of ten (10) feet from the building is not maintained. f. There is no generator testing log or maintenance log. g. There is no service contract to inspect or maintain the generator. h. The dishwasher is not working and sanitizing properly. i. There is a need to update the Health Services Policies and Procedures manual. j. There is a need to update the Dental Care Procedures manual. k. There is no psychotropic medications policy. l. The openings in the ceiling air grills' mesh are larger than the recommended 3/16" sq or 16-mesh psi. m. There is a need to update the Policies and Procedures manual. n. There is a need to update the Inmate Discipline Policy and Plan. o. There is a need to update the limitations on the Disciplinary Policy and Procedure plan. 10 p. There is no sobering cell or suicidal placement plan. q. The plumbing access panel in the maximum security corridor is not locked.
F11 Page 18
The expenditure for out-of-county residential treatment programs has increased steadily over the last several years, and has nearly doubled since last year. There are many factors for determining whether a client is better served by the programs available within the County, or by residential treatment programs not available within the County. However, the Grand Jury has found that the lack of trust between the two “camps” of employees has led to an undetermined number of clients either being underserved within the County or being sent out of the County for treatment at additional expense.

Recommendations 11

Conclusions 1

Commendations 4