📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
Mendocino County Grand Jury
• 2002-2003
Mendocino County Jail The Mendocino County Jail (mcj) is located in Ukiah, California and is staffed by The Sheriff
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 22 findings
F1
Page 54
The staffing is adequate for the number of inmates.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Page 54
Jail improvements are ongoing.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Page 54
The jail now has better facility to accommodate attorney-inmate conferences.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Page 54
A library stocked with material available for G.E.D. education; self- improvement, entertainment and spiritual study is contained in a spacious 54 well-lighted area. The inmates have also the opportunity to read children stories, tape them and send the tape home to their children.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Page 55
The “in-house/jail Psychiatric unit has been successful since being integrated the past (2) two years.
Related Recommendations (1)
R22
Page 64
There is no licensed holding cell or room on the coast., At times a patient will be held at the Sheriff’s substation in Fort Bragg or by the Fort Bragg Police, perhaps in the back of a patrol car, until a crises worker arrives. Response: Again, the City of Willits is not informed regarding facilities available on the Coast either at the Fort Bragg Police Department or the Sheriff’s Substation and therefore can neither agree nor disagree with the finding. With specific reference to the Grand Jury’s recommendations related to Mental Health Crisis Services, the City Council offers the following responses: Law enforcement agencies strengthen their partnership with the DMH and other mental health stakeholders. (Finding 5, 13) Response: The City of Willits supports the recommendation of the Grand Jury that we focus our efforts to strengthen the partnership between the Mental Health Department, law enforcement agencies, and mental health stakeholders. We are informed that the various agencies will meet in October in an effort to strengthen that partnership between and amongst the agencies. While further specific implementation time lines are anticipated to grow out of that October meeting, such activities and corresponding time lines are best identified by the Mental Health Department and law enforcement agency staff in partnership with other mental health stakeholders. At each opportunity the City of Willits will join its partner agencies throughout the County to achieve this purpose. The BOS fund training to improve understanding of the new procedures, to allow each group to appreciate the concepts and problems of the other, and to help clients to use all resources to the fullest. Response: This recommendation has been implemented, given the City’s understanding that the County will be funding the referenced training activities planned for October. The City of Willits will continue to work with other agencies and stakeholders in our common effort to understand new procedures and the issues confronting each stakeholder in the process. Thus, the recommendation has been implemented, and it is anticipated that other training opportunities will grow out of the planned October workshop. DMH, law enforcement, and hospital medical personnel meet on a regular basis to share knowledge and procedures in dealing with the mentally ill. (Findings 5, 13) Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. The Police Chief will advocate periodic meetings at the upcoming October stakeholders meeting to assure that all agencies and stakeholders are well informed. DMH and AODP integrate health services and substance abuse treatment (Finding 15) Response: It is the City’s belief that it cannot responsibly comment regarding the integration of services between two county departments. Clearly, public purposes are best served by a full integration and understanding of their programs and services. This recommendation, therefore, requires more study or analysis, yet such study and analysis is appropriately conducted by the Department of Mental Health and the Division of Alcohol and Other Drug Programs, with input from the various 105 other human service functions of the County, to assure as seamless a service delivery system as possible. WILLITS CITY GOVERNMENT City Administration City staff and Council Members enjoyed the opportunity to share our story with the Grand Jury and appreciate the time expended by the Grand Jury in completing its mission. The City Council offers the following responses for those findings relating to City administration: Willits has sound fiscal practices with an annual budget of $4.06 million, with a reserve of $415,000 for emergencies. Willits also had a carry over of $1.4 million from last fiscal year. Response: Agree with finding. Willits follows solid plans for operating the city and follows its policies and procedures. Response: Agree with finding. Appropriate departments handle all complaints quickly and efficiently. Response: Agree with finding. Willits is following its Ten Year Plan for improvements throughout the city. Response: Agree with finding. Willits is studying the possibilities for growth and new business. Response: Agree with finding. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the City of Willits are still working on the Willits 101 Bypass; construction has not been started. The Willits administration has supported the bypass, but some local citizens continue to request more information from Caltrans, stalling construction. The Caltrans Director signed the Draft Environmental Document for the Willits Bypass on May 13, 2002. Response: Agree with finding. It should be noted that since the Grand Jury Report was published, the Willits Bypass EIR has benefitted from several local meetings and public hearings designed to solicit comments on the Draft EIR prior to adoption of the Final EIR by Caltrans. Willits has a strategic plan that emphasizes ‘Business to Business’ (business suppliers) and bringing cottage industries to the downtown area. Response: Agree with finding. Willits administration is concerned that local media is not reporting the city’s successful programs. Response: Disagree with finding. While in past years the City has expressed concern regarding the accuracy of local media coverage of City programs and activities, the City’s current relationship with our local newspaper has improved significantly, enhanced through regular and ongoing communication. Because the Grand Jury has provided no recommendations regarding City administration, no responses are provided herein. City Public Works The City Council shares the belief that our Public Works Department functions well. Relative to the specific findings of the Grand Jury, we offer the following comments: The yard was clean and all equipment not in use was under cover. Response: Agree with finding. Public works maintains equipment properly. Response: Agree with finding. Public works does not have a common tracking system for all department data. Response: Disagree with finding in part. While project management systems relative to each area of responsibility are in place (parks, storm drains, streets, etc.), due to the diverse nature of the departmental responsibilities, no single common tracking system would fit the needs of each functional area. The Public Works Director advised the Grand Jury that the department needs one more technician and a clerical worker. Response: Agree with finding. During visits to the offices and shop areas, the Grand Jury saw no Cal-OSHA safety books or posters. Response: Agree with finding. The City offers the following responses regarding the recommendations of the Grand Jury: Public Works Department establish a system for tracking work orders. (Finding 11) Response: The recommendation requires more study and analysis. This recommendation addresses a tracking system as opposed to a “common tracking system” and therefore differs somewhat from Finding 11. However, the Department currently does track work orders utilizing a chronological/date system. The data content of the work orders (i.e., vehicle usage, excavation quantities, material use, etc.) would benefit from an improved tracking system. Creating a system that could track the work order data, as well as other administrative requirements, may prove difficult. However, implementation of a data tracking system will be evaluated utilizing Microsoft Access. Programming and setup of the system will require considerable staff time and some outside programming support. However, it is anticipated that such initial programming costs will be affordable within the current departmental budget, even though it is not specifically referenced as a contemplated expenditure during the current fiscal year. Because external support costs related to design of the tracking system will be relatively minor in nature, the Department is adjusting proposed expenditures in several line items in the current year to offset the cost of initiating this important project. Willits hire another technician and a clerical worker for the Public Works Department (Finding 12) Response: The recommendation has been implemented. The City has advertised to fill this additional Public Works position and has conducted interviews of applicants. Background checks of the most qualified applicants are currently underway. Funding of this position survived the budget challenges this past Spring, and we estimate bringing an individual on board to meet this need during the first or second week of September. Relative to the clerical worker position, no funding was included in the current year’s budget to address this need. In the interim, it is contemplated that clerical support available at City Hall will continue to, at least at a minimal level, address departmental needs. As the department prepares its budget requests for the 2003- 2004 fiscal year this next Spring, funding will be included in the departmental request to provide an appropriate level of clerical support in a departmentally specific way. It is anticipated that initially, should this position be funded, it would be part time with the goal of expanding it into a full time position at some point in the future when funding may be more accessible to the City. With the current City commitment to maintain programs which have been un-funded by the State due to its budget problems, the City is not in a position to authorize additional positions, even at the part time level, during the current fiscal year. The Public Works Department distribute CAL-OSHA safety books and posters as required by applicable laws. (Finding 13) Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. The Department has requested additional posters and safety books. While the City maintains Injury Prevention Program manuals in each department, additional publications from OSHA available through the State will be made available to employees in not only the Public Works Department, but also the Water and Sewer Departments. Police Department The Willits Police Department includes 15 sworn personnel, 3 community service officer positions, 5 dispatchers, 12 patrol vehicles, and no reserve officers. Relative to those findings made by the Grand Jury, the City offers the following responses: While the Grand Jury observed officers, they conducted their activities professionally with restraint and consideration to those being stopped and talked to or given notice or citations. Response: Agree with finding. The City remains proud of its officers and their ability to interact with the public in a professional and friendly manner. The Grand Jury’s attempted to interview citizens with a different perspective on the Police Department. Citizens refused to give details of their experiences with the Police Department because they said they fear retaliation. Persons interviewed by the Grand Jury were reluctant to file formal complaints because of fear of retaliation. Response: The Grand Jury’s findings lead the reader to believe that our community is unwilling to share their concerns about the Police Department because they “fear retaliation”. The City must respectfully disagree with this
F6
Page 55
During the past year, security and surveillance has been up-graded.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Page 55
According to the Psychiatric Department, the use of Methamphetamine is cited to be the most prevalent cause of crime in Mendocino County.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Page 55
Recovery, rehabilitation and self-improvement are available through staff- counselors and guest speakers who are contract providers and background checked volunteers.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
Page 58
67 Response (City Council): The recommendation has already been implemented. The RCFPD has retrieved ISO rating information, has requested a rating review, and has been reviewed. Understanding the components that contribute to a reduced (better) ISO rating, the District is steadily working towards that end (i.e. standardized training with supporting documentation, regular water testing, increased water availability, etc.) F. The City complete and gather into one compendium policies and procedures for City elected officials, employees, commissions and citizen advisory groups. (Finding 8) Response (City Council): The recommendation will be implemented in the future. This will be accomplished by June 30, 2004, with the codification of ordinances (see B above). G. The City Council allow more flexible time for public comment during meetings. To allow more time for public comment, the City consider a separate Planning Commission meeting on a different day than the City Council meeting. (Finding 9) Response (City Council): This recommendation will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council sets a five-minute limitation on public comment under Privilege of the Floor for items not appearing on the Agenda. This limitation is not often adhered to and is used as a tool to maintain order and structure if necessary. Plus, the public is able to comment on Agenda items as they are discussed on the Agenda. Written comments from the public are also encouraged. The Council did have a separate Planning Commission but abandoned it after a five-year period because it 68 was becoming increasingly difficult to find people to serve on both the City Council and the Planning Commission. It is a small town and those willing to donate time to serve on boards are few. H. The City continue its efforts to enhance the emergency services program by dialog with the Emergency Services Authority in Ukiah. The City address issue of establishing and equipping an emergency shelter. (Finding 10) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The VFW Hall is used as a council meeting Chamber, a court, and as an emergency operation center. During an emergency, it will become the communication point for disaster/rescue related activity. It is outfitted with a generator, phone lines, emergency radios, etc. Separate from this facility, the Point Arena High School gymnasium is designated as a Red Cross emergency shelter. I. The City decide either to continue its efforts to reinstate the Arena Rescue boat to operational status, or discontinue the program and sell the boat. The Grand Jury encourages the City to give protection of coastal resources from oil spills a high priority in making its decision. (Finding 11) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The City recently received grant funds to upgrade the rescue boat. It has now been upgraded and is now back in operation. J. The City adopt a minimum time period after leaving office to restrict City elected officials in regard to accepting City employment. (Finding 12) 69 Response (City Council): This recommendation will be implemented in the future. A policy will be adopted no later than December 31, 2002. K. The City establish a capital improvement program in accordance with its General Plan goal. (Finding 13) Response (City Council): This policy will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council has developed a transportation plan, the wastewater treatment plant has a capital improvements program to ensure its future viability and the pier facility doesn’t generate enough revenue to provide for a complete capital improvements schedule. Outside funding must be sought for big-ticket capital improvement items at the pier facility. The California Department of Boating and Waterways has been contacted for possible funding for hoist upgrades. L. The city comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Comprehensive Access Plan. (Finding 14) Response (City Council): This recommendation has been partially implemented. The recommendation is vague. However, the City is currently working to install new sidewalks on a couple of residential streets that currently don’t have sidewalks. The City leases the City Hall and chambers from the County of Mendocino. Parking along Highway One (Main Street) is within the California Department of Transportation’s jurisdiction. The Pier Facility is handicapped accessible. Comment The Grand Jury commends the city government and citizenry of Point Arena on its completion and adoption of its General Plan, its efforts to establish its emergency services program, its successful petroleum and solid waste recycling program, its support of the Safe Passages program, and its sound fiscal management. The Grand Jury applauds the dedication of the virtually unpaid elected officials of the city and the dedication of its salaried employees as well. Misinformation and lack of communication between various factions of the citizenry and City government is endemic. The public does not regularly attend City Council meetings. The City Council in the past has had to appoint members because of lack of interest. The Grand Jury would remind the citizenry of Point Arena that “you get the government you deserve.” Supplemental Comments The Grand Jury attended the special joint meeting of the City of Point Arena and the Redwood Coast Fire Protection District on February 19, 2003 in which Point Arena considered the following positive steps to begin resolving the public safety issues in the Arena cove area. (1) The owners of the Wharfmaster’s Inn and Coast Guard House B&B agreed to upgrade their water storage to approximately 20,000 gallons with fire equipment access and hose connection access. 71 (2) The City of Point Arena and the owners of the aforementioned lodging establishments agreed to improve the secondary vehicle access to the Wharfmaster’s Inn. (3) The City of Point arena agreed to upgrade the main water transmission line supplying the Arena cove area, to assure adequate water pressure and volume. The plans are to be completed by August 19, 2003. (4) The City of Point Arena is to aggressively procure funding to complete the new water line. MENDOCINO COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION As a part of the Grand Jury’s routine oversight responsibilities as mandated by the California Penal Code, the 2002-2003 Grand Jury selected the Risk Management Division of the County of Mendocino Administrative Office. The primary, but not exclusive, focus of this review was to survey the various insurance and reinsurance programs managed by the Risk Management Office, review related and supporting programs, and look at the adverse impact of budgetary constraints on all areas of operations including staffing. Special emphasis was given to the General Liability Self-Insured Program. The Grand Jury did not review the administration of the Health Insurance Program. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION In accomplishing it’s review of the County Risk Management Division, the Grand Jury interviewed the County Risk Manager, The County Administrator, County Counsel, and selected Risk Management Staff. In addition, the Grand Jury reviewed the February 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self Insured Liability Program, the December 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability Program (Forecast for Policy Year 2003-2004), the most recent Liability Claim Audit of July 8, 2000, the most recent Budget Narrative, the March 2002 Workers’ 73 Compensation Claims Audit, the Return to Work Program, Policy Notebook, Property Schedule/Valuations Notebook, (CSAC) Insurance Program Notebook, CSAC Broker Activity Report, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Book, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Executive Committee Tentative Agenda Book, The Mendocino County Safety Manual, The 2002-2003 Division Budget, and applicable Mendocino County Ordinances.
F9
Page 55
Parenting classes, alcohol and drug abuse, life skills, anger management, and religious services are offered at this facility.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
Page 58
67 Response (City Council): The recommendation has already been implemented. The RCFPD has retrieved ISO rating information, has requested a rating review, and has been reviewed. Understanding the components that contribute to a reduced (better) ISO rating, the District is steadily working towards that end (i.e. standardized training with supporting documentation, regular water testing, increased water availability, etc.) F. The City complete and gather into one compendium policies and procedures for City elected officials, employees, commissions and citizen advisory groups. (Finding 8) Response (City Council): The recommendation will be implemented in the future. This will be accomplished by June 30, 2004, with the codification of ordinances (see B above). G. The City Council allow more flexible time for public comment during meetings. To allow more time for public comment, the City consider a separate Planning Commission meeting on a different day than the City Council meeting. (Finding 9) Response (City Council): This recommendation will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council sets a five-minute limitation on public comment under Privilege of the Floor for items not appearing on the Agenda. This limitation is not often adhered to and is used as a tool to maintain order and structure if necessary. Plus, the public is able to comment on Agenda items as they are discussed on the Agenda. Written comments from the public are also encouraged. The Council did have a separate Planning Commission but abandoned it after a five-year period because it 68 was becoming increasingly difficult to find people to serve on both the City Council and the Planning Commission. It is a small town and those willing to donate time to serve on boards are few. H. The City continue its efforts to enhance the emergency services program by dialog with the Emergency Services Authority in Ukiah. The City address issue of establishing and equipping an emergency shelter. (Finding 10) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The VFW Hall is used as a council meeting Chamber, a court, and as an emergency operation center. During an emergency, it will become the communication point for disaster/rescue related activity. It is outfitted with a generator, phone lines, emergency radios, etc. Separate from this facility, the Point Arena High School gymnasium is designated as a Red Cross emergency shelter. I. The City decide either to continue its efforts to reinstate the Arena Rescue boat to operational status, or discontinue the program and sell the boat. The Grand Jury encourages the City to give protection of coastal resources from oil spills a high priority in making its decision. (Finding 11) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The City recently received grant funds to upgrade the rescue boat. It has now been upgraded and is now back in operation. J. The City adopt a minimum time period after leaving office to restrict City elected officials in regard to accepting City employment. (Finding 12) 69 Response (City Council): This recommendation will be implemented in the future. A policy will be adopted no later than December 31, 2002. K. The City establish a capital improvement program in accordance with its General Plan goal. (Finding 13) Response (City Council): This policy will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council has developed a transportation plan, the wastewater treatment plant has a capital improvements program to ensure its future viability and the pier facility doesn’t generate enough revenue to provide for a complete capital improvements schedule. Outside funding must be sought for big-ticket capital improvement items at the pier facility. The California Department of Boating and Waterways has been contacted for possible funding for hoist upgrades. L. The city comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Comprehensive Access Plan. (Finding 14) Response (City Council): This recommendation has been partially implemented. The recommendation is vague. However, the City is currently working to install new sidewalks on a couple of residential streets that currently don’t have sidewalks. The City leases the City Hall and chambers from the County of Mendocino. Parking along Highway One (Main Street) is within the California Department of Transportation’s jurisdiction. The Pier Facility is handicapped accessible. Comment The Grand Jury commends the city government and citizenry of Point Arena on its completion and adoption of its General Plan, its efforts to establish its emergency services program, its successful petroleum and solid waste recycling program, its support of the Safe Passages program, and its sound fiscal management. The Grand Jury applauds the dedication of the virtually unpaid elected officials of the city and the dedication of its salaried employees as well. Misinformation and lack of communication between various factions of the citizenry and City government is endemic. The public does not regularly attend City Council meetings. The City Council in the past has had to appoint members because of lack of interest. The Grand Jury would remind the citizenry of Point Arena that “you get the government you deserve.” Supplemental Comments The Grand Jury attended the special joint meeting of the City of Point Arena and the Redwood Coast Fire Protection District on February 19, 2003 in which Point Arena considered the following positive steps to begin resolving the public safety issues in the Arena cove area. (1) The owners of the Wharfmaster’s Inn and Coast Guard House B&B agreed to upgrade their water storage to approximately 20,000 gallons with fire equipment access and hose connection access. 71 (2) The City of Point Arena and the owners of the aforementioned lodging establishments agreed to improve the secondary vehicle access to the Wharfmaster’s Inn. (3) The City of Point arena agreed to upgrade the main water transmission line supplying the Arena cove area, to assure adequate water pressure and volume. The plans are to be completed by August 19, 2003. (4) The City of Point Arena is to aggressively procure funding to complete the new water line. MENDOCINO COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION As a part of the Grand Jury’s routine oversight responsibilities as mandated by the California Penal Code, the 2002-2003 Grand Jury selected the Risk Management Division of the County of Mendocino Administrative Office. The primary, but not exclusive, focus of this review was to survey the various insurance and reinsurance programs managed by the Risk Management Office, review related and supporting programs, and look at the adverse impact of budgetary constraints on all areas of operations including staffing. Special emphasis was given to the General Liability Self-Insured Program. The Grand Jury did not review the administration of the Health Insurance Program. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION In accomplishing it’s review of the County Risk Management Division, the Grand Jury interviewed the County Risk Manager, The County Administrator, County Counsel, and selected Risk Management Staff. In addition, the Grand Jury reviewed the February 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self Insured Liability Program, the December 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability Program (Forecast for Policy Year 2003-2004), the most recent Liability Claim Audit of July 8, 2000, the most recent Budget Narrative, the March 2002 Workers’ 73 Compensation Claims Audit, the Return to Work Program, Policy Notebook, Property Schedule/Valuations Notebook, (CSAC) Insurance Program Notebook, CSAC Broker Activity Report, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Book, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Executive Committee Tentative Agenda Book, The Mendocino County Safety Manual, The 2002-2003 Division Budget, and applicable Mendocino County Ordinances.
F10
Page 59
Willits High school has recently published a dress code that was formulated by recommendations from parents in the community.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
Page 58
67 Response (City Council): The recommendation has already been implemented. The RCFPD has retrieved ISO rating information, has requested a rating review, and has been reviewed. Understanding the components that contribute to a reduced (better) ISO rating, the District is steadily working towards that end (i.e. standardized training with supporting documentation, regular water testing, increased water availability, etc.) F. The City complete and gather into one compendium policies and procedures for City elected officials, employees, commissions and citizen advisory groups. (Finding 8) Response (City Council): The recommendation will be implemented in the future. This will be accomplished by June 30, 2004, with the codification of ordinances (see B above). G. The City Council allow more flexible time for public comment during meetings. To allow more time for public comment, the City consider a separate Planning Commission meeting on a different day than the City Council meeting. (Finding 9) Response (City Council): This recommendation will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council sets a five-minute limitation on public comment under Privilege of the Floor for items not appearing on the Agenda. This limitation is not often adhered to and is used as a tool to maintain order and structure if necessary. Plus, the public is able to comment on Agenda items as they are discussed on the Agenda. Written comments from the public are also encouraged. The Council did have a separate Planning Commission but abandoned it after a five-year period because it 68 was becoming increasingly difficult to find people to serve on both the City Council and the Planning Commission. It is a small town and those willing to donate time to serve on boards are few. H. The City continue its efforts to enhance the emergency services program by dialog with the Emergency Services Authority in Ukiah. The City address issue of establishing and equipping an emergency shelter. (Finding 10) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The VFW Hall is used as a council meeting Chamber, a court, and as an emergency operation center. During an emergency, it will become the communication point for disaster/rescue related activity. It is outfitted with a generator, phone lines, emergency radios, etc. Separate from this facility, the Point Arena High School gymnasium is designated as a Red Cross emergency shelter. I. The City decide either to continue its efforts to reinstate the Arena Rescue boat to operational status, or discontinue the program and sell the boat. The Grand Jury encourages the City to give protection of coastal resources from oil spills a high priority in making its decision. (Finding 11) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The City recently received grant funds to upgrade the rescue boat. It has now been upgraded and is now back in operation. J. The City adopt a minimum time period after leaving office to restrict City elected officials in regard to accepting City employment. (Finding 12) 69 Response (City Council): This recommendation will be implemented in the future. A policy will be adopted no later than December 31, 2002. K. The City establish a capital improvement program in accordance with its General Plan goal. (Finding 13) Response (City Council): This policy will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council has developed a transportation plan, the wastewater treatment plant has a capital improvements program to ensure its future viability and the pier facility doesn’t generate enough revenue to provide for a complete capital improvements schedule. Outside funding must be sought for big-ticket capital improvement items at the pier facility. The California Department of Boating and Waterways has been contacted for possible funding for hoist upgrades. L. The city comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Comprehensive Access Plan. (Finding 14) Response (City Council): This recommendation has been partially implemented. The recommendation is vague. However, the City is currently working to install new sidewalks on a couple of residential streets that currently don’t have sidewalks. The City leases the City Hall and chambers from the County of Mendocino. Parking along Highway One (Main Street) is within the California Department of Transportation’s jurisdiction. The Pier Facility is handicapped accessible. Comment The Grand Jury commends the city government and citizenry of Point Arena on its completion and adoption of its General Plan, its efforts to establish its emergency services program, its successful petroleum and solid waste recycling program, its support of the Safe Passages program, and its sound fiscal management. The Grand Jury applauds the dedication of the virtually unpaid elected officials of the city and the dedication of its salaried employees as well. Misinformation and lack of communication between various factions of the citizenry and City government is endemic. The public does not regularly attend City Council meetings. The City Council in the past has had to appoint members because of lack of interest. The Grand Jury would remind the citizenry of Point Arena that “you get the government you deserve.” Supplemental Comments The Grand Jury attended the special joint meeting of the City of Point Arena and the Redwood Coast Fire Protection District on February 19, 2003 in which Point Arena considered the following positive steps to begin resolving the public safety issues in the Arena cove area. (1) The owners of the Wharfmaster’s Inn and Coast Guard House B&B agreed to upgrade their water storage to approximately 20,000 gallons with fire equipment access and hose connection access. 71 (2) The City of Point Arena and the owners of the aforementioned lodging establishments agreed to improve the secondary vehicle access to the Wharfmaster’s Inn. (3) The City of Point arena agreed to upgrade the main water transmission line supplying the Arena cove area, to assure adequate water pressure and volume. The plans are to be completed by August 19, 2003. (4) The City of Point Arena is to aggressively procure funding to complete the new water line. MENDOCINO COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION As a part of the Grand Jury’s routine oversight responsibilities as mandated by the California Penal Code, the 2002-2003 Grand Jury selected the Risk Management Division of the County of Mendocino Administrative Office. The primary, but not exclusive, focus of this review was to survey the various insurance and reinsurance programs managed by the Risk Management Office, review related and supporting programs, and look at the adverse impact of budgetary constraints on all areas of operations including staffing. Special emphasis was given to the General Liability Self-Insured Program. The Grand Jury did not review the administration of the Health Insurance Program. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION In accomplishing it’s review of the County Risk Management Division, the Grand Jury interviewed the County Risk Manager, The County Administrator, County Counsel, and selected Risk Management Staff. In addition, the Grand Jury reviewed the February 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self Insured Liability Program, the December 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability Program (Forecast for Policy Year 2003-2004), the most recent Liability Claim Audit of July 8, 2000, the most recent Budget Narrative, the March 2002 Workers’ 73 Compensation Claims Audit, the Return to Work Program, Policy Notebook, Property Schedule/Valuations Notebook, (CSAC) Insurance Program Notebook, CSAC Broker Activity Report, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Book, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Executive Committee Tentative Agenda Book, The Mendocino County Safety Manual, The 2002-2003 Division Budget, and applicable Mendocino County Ordinances.
F11
Page 64
The rescue boat for Arena Rescue is inoperative because it needs new engines. The City is exploring the possibility of grants for new engines. At present the rescue boat is a depreciating asset because of lack of maintenance and damage from exposure to the elements.
Related Recommendations (2)
R7
Page 58
67 Response (City Council): The recommendation has already been implemented. The RCFPD has retrieved ISO rating information, has requested a rating review, and has been reviewed. Understanding the components that contribute to a reduced (better) ISO rating, the District is steadily working towards that end (i.e. standardized training with supporting documentation, regular water testing, increased water availability, etc.) F. The City complete and gather into one compendium policies and procedures for City elected officials, employees, commissions and citizen advisory groups. (Finding 8) Response (City Council): The recommendation will be implemented in the future. This will be accomplished by June 30, 2004, with the codification of ordinances (see B above). G. The City Council allow more flexible time for public comment during meetings. To allow more time for public comment, the City consider a separate Planning Commission meeting on a different day than the City Council meeting. (Finding 9) Response (City Council): This recommendation will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council sets a five-minute limitation on public comment under Privilege of the Floor for items not appearing on the Agenda. This limitation is not often adhered to and is used as a tool to maintain order and structure if necessary. Plus, the public is able to comment on Agenda items as they are discussed on the Agenda. Written comments from the public are also encouraged. The Council did have a separate Planning Commission but abandoned it after a five-year period because it 68 was becoming increasingly difficult to find people to serve on both the City Council and the Planning Commission. It is a small town and those willing to donate time to serve on boards are few. H. The City continue its efforts to enhance the emergency services program by dialog with the Emergency Services Authority in Ukiah. The City address issue of establishing and equipping an emergency shelter. (Finding 10) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The VFW Hall is used as a council meeting Chamber, a court, and as an emergency operation center. During an emergency, it will become the communication point for disaster/rescue related activity. It is outfitted with a generator, phone lines, emergency radios, etc. Separate from this facility, the Point Arena High School gymnasium is designated as a Red Cross emergency shelter. I. The City decide either to continue its efforts to reinstate the Arena Rescue boat to operational status, or discontinue the program and sell the boat. The Grand Jury encourages the City to give protection of coastal resources from oil spills a high priority in making its decision. (Finding 11) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The City recently received grant funds to upgrade the rescue boat. It has now been upgraded and is now back in operation. J. The City adopt a minimum time period after leaving office to restrict City elected officials in regard to accepting City employment. (Finding 12) 69 Response (City Council): This recommendation will be implemented in the future. A policy will be adopted no later than December 31, 2002. K. The City establish a capital improvement program in accordance with its General Plan goal. (Finding 13) Response (City Council): This policy will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council has developed a transportation plan, the wastewater treatment plant has a capital improvements program to ensure its future viability and the pier facility doesn’t generate enough revenue to provide for a complete capital improvements schedule. Outside funding must be sought for big-ticket capital improvement items at the pier facility. The California Department of Boating and Waterways has been contacted for possible funding for hoist upgrades. L. The city comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Comprehensive Access Plan. (Finding 14) Response (City Council): This recommendation has been partially implemented. The recommendation is vague. However, the City is currently working to install new sidewalks on a couple of residential streets that currently don’t have sidewalks. The City leases the City Hall and chambers from the County of Mendocino. Parking along Highway One (Main Street) is within the California Department of Transportation’s jurisdiction. The Pier Facility is handicapped accessible. Comment The Grand Jury commends the city government and citizenry of Point Arena on its completion and adoption of its General Plan, its efforts to establish its emergency services program, its successful petroleum and solid waste recycling program, its support of the Safe Passages program, and its sound fiscal management. The Grand Jury applauds the dedication of the virtually unpaid elected officials of the city and the dedication of its salaried employees as well. Misinformation and lack of communication between various factions of the citizenry and City government is endemic. The public does not regularly attend City Council meetings. The City Council in the past has had to appoint members because of lack of interest. The Grand Jury would remind the citizenry of Point Arena that “you get the government you deserve.” Supplemental Comments The Grand Jury attended the special joint meeting of the City of Point Arena and the Redwood Coast Fire Protection District on February 19, 2003 in which Point Arena considered the following positive steps to begin resolving the public safety issues in the Arena cove area. (1) The owners of the Wharfmaster’s Inn and Coast Guard House B&B agreed to upgrade their water storage to approximately 20,000 gallons with fire equipment access and hose connection access. 71 (2) The City of Point Arena and the owners of the aforementioned lodging establishments agreed to improve the secondary vehicle access to the Wharfmaster’s Inn. (3) The City of Point arena agreed to upgrade the main water transmission line supplying the Arena cove area, to assure adequate water pressure and volume. The plans are to be completed by August 19, 2003. (4) The City of Point Arena is to aggressively procure funding to complete the new water line. MENDOCINO COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION As a part of the Grand Jury’s routine oversight responsibilities as mandated by the California Penal Code, the 2002-2003 Grand Jury selected the Risk Management Division of the County of Mendocino Administrative Office. The primary, but not exclusive, focus of this review was to survey the various insurance and reinsurance programs managed by the Risk Management Office, review related and supporting programs, and look at the adverse impact of budgetary constraints on all areas of operations including staffing. Special emphasis was given to the General Liability Self-Insured Program. The Grand Jury did not review the administration of the Health Insurance Program. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION In accomplishing it’s review of the County Risk Management Division, the Grand Jury interviewed the County Risk Manager, The County Administrator, County Counsel, and selected Risk Management Staff. In addition, the Grand Jury reviewed the February 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self Insured Liability Program, the December 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability Program (Forecast for Policy Year 2003-2004), the most recent Liability Claim Audit of July 8, 2000, the most recent Budget Narrative, the March 2002 Workers’ 73 Compensation Claims Audit, the Return to Work Program, Policy Notebook, Property Schedule/Valuations Notebook, (CSAC) Insurance Program Notebook, CSAC Broker Activity Report, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Book, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Executive Committee Tentative Agenda Book, The Mendocino County Safety Manual, The 2002-2003 Division Budget, and applicable Mendocino County Ordinances.
R22
Page 64
There is no licensed holding cell or room on the coast., At times a patient will be held at the Sheriff’s substation in Fort Bragg or by the Fort Bragg Police, perhaps in the back of a patrol car, until a crises worker arrives. Response: Again, the City of Willits is not informed regarding facilities available on the Coast either at the Fort Bragg Police Department or the Sheriff’s Substation and therefore can neither agree nor disagree with the finding. With specific reference to the Grand Jury’s recommendations related to Mental Health Crisis Services, the City Council offers the following responses: Law enforcement agencies strengthen their partnership with the DMH and other mental health stakeholders. (Finding 5, 13) Response: The City of Willits supports the recommendation of the Grand Jury that we focus our efforts to strengthen the partnership between the Mental Health Department, law enforcement agencies, and mental health stakeholders. We are informed that the various agencies will meet in October in an effort to strengthen that partnership between and amongst the agencies. While further specific implementation time lines are anticipated to grow out of that October meeting, such activities and corresponding time lines are best identified by the Mental Health Department and law enforcement agency staff in partnership with other mental health stakeholders. At each opportunity the City of Willits will join its partner agencies throughout the County to achieve this purpose. The BOS fund training to improve understanding of the new procedures, to allow each group to appreciate the concepts and problems of the other, and to help clients to use all resources to the fullest. Response: This recommendation has been implemented, given the City’s understanding that the County will be funding the referenced training activities planned for October. The City of Willits will continue to work with other agencies and stakeholders in our common effort to understand new procedures and the issues confronting each stakeholder in the process. Thus, the recommendation has been implemented, and it is anticipated that other training opportunities will grow out of the planned October workshop. DMH, law enforcement, and hospital medical personnel meet on a regular basis to share knowledge and procedures in dealing with the mentally ill. (Findings 5, 13) Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. The Police Chief will advocate periodic meetings at the upcoming October stakeholders meeting to assure that all agencies and stakeholders are well informed. DMH and AODP integrate health services and substance abuse treatment (Finding 15) Response: It is the City’s belief that it cannot responsibly comment regarding the integration of services between two county departments. Clearly, public purposes are best served by a full integration and understanding of their programs and services. This recommendation, therefore, requires more study or analysis, yet such study and analysis is appropriately conducted by the Department of Mental Health and the Division of Alcohol and Other Drug Programs, with input from the various 105 other human service functions of the County, to assure as seamless a service delivery system as possible. WILLITS CITY GOVERNMENT City Administration City staff and Council Members enjoyed the opportunity to share our story with the Grand Jury and appreciate the time expended by the Grand Jury in completing its mission. The City Council offers the following responses for those findings relating to City administration: Willits has sound fiscal practices with an annual budget of $4.06 million, with a reserve of $415,000 for emergencies. Willits also had a carry over of $1.4 million from last fiscal year. Response: Agree with finding. Willits follows solid plans for operating the city and follows its policies and procedures. Response: Agree with finding. Appropriate departments handle all complaints quickly and efficiently. Response: Agree with finding. Willits is following its Ten Year Plan for improvements throughout the city. Response: Agree with finding. Willits is studying the possibilities for growth and new business. Response: Agree with finding. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the City of Willits are still working on the Willits 101 Bypass; construction has not been started. The Willits administration has supported the bypass, but some local citizens continue to request more information from Caltrans, stalling construction. The Caltrans Director signed the Draft Environmental Document for the Willits Bypass on May 13, 2002. Response: Agree with finding. It should be noted that since the Grand Jury Report was published, the Willits Bypass EIR has benefitted from several local meetings and public hearings designed to solicit comments on the Draft EIR prior to adoption of the Final EIR by Caltrans. Willits has a strategic plan that emphasizes ‘Business to Business’ (business suppliers) and bringing cottage industries to the downtown area. Response: Agree with finding. Willits administration is concerned that local media is not reporting the city’s successful programs. Response: Disagree with finding. While in past years the City has expressed concern regarding the accuracy of local media coverage of City programs and activities, the City’s current relationship with our local newspaper has improved significantly, enhanced through regular and ongoing communication. Because the Grand Jury has provided no recommendations regarding City administration, no responses are provided herein. City Public Works The City Council shares the belief that our Public Works Department functions well. Relative to the specific findings of the Grand Jury, we offer the following comments: The yard was clean and all equipment not in use was under cover. Response: Agree with finding. Public works maintains equipment properly. Response: Agree with finding. Public works does not have a common tracking system for all department data. Response: Disagree with finding in part. While project management systems relative to each area of responsibility are in place (parks, storm drains, streets, etc.), due to the diverse nature of the departmental responsibilities, no single common tracking system would fit the needs of each functional area. The Public Works Director advised the Grand Jury that the department needs one more technician and a clerical worker. Response: Agree with finding. During visits to the offices and shop areas, the Grand Jury saw no Cal-OSHA safety books or posters. Response: Agree with finding. The City offers the following responses regarding the recommendations of the Grand Jury: Public Works Department establish a system for tracking work orders. (Finding 11) Response: The recommendation requires more study and analysis. This recommendation addresses a tracking system as opposed to a “common tracking system” and therefore differs somewhat from Finding 11. However, the Department currently does track work orders utilizing a chronological/date system. The data content of the work orders (i.e., vehicle usage, excavation quantities, material use, etc.) would benefit from an improved tracking system. Creating a system that could track the work order data, as well as other administrative requirements, may prove difficult. However, implementation of a data tracking system will be evaluated utilizing Microsoft Access. Programming and setup of the system will require considerable staff time and some outside programming support. However, it is anticipated that such initial programming costs will be affordable within the current departmental budget, even though it is not specifically referenced as a contemplated expenditure during the current fiscal year. Because external support costs related to design of the tracking system will be relatively minor in nature, the Department is adjusting proposed expenditures in several line items in the current year to offset the cost of initiating this important project. Willits hire another technician and a clerical worker for the Public Works Department (Finding 12) Response: The recommendation has been implemented. The City has advertised to fill this additional Public Works position and has conducted interviews of applicants. Background checks of the most qualified applicants are currently underway. Funding of this position survived the budget challenges this past Spring, and we estimate bringing an individual on board to meet this need during the first or second week of September. Relative to the clerical worker position, no funding was included in the current year’s budget to address this need. In the interim, it is contemplated that clerical support available at City Hall will continue to, at least at a minimal level, address departmental needs. As the department prepares its budget requests for the 2003- 2004 fiscal year this next Spring, funding will be included in the departmental request to provide an appropriate level of clerical support in a departmentally specific way. It is anticipated that initially, should this position be funded, it would be part time with the goal of expanding it into a full time position at some point in the future when funding may be more accessible to the City. With the current City commitment to maintain programs which have been un-funded by the State due to its budget problems, the City is not in a position to authorize additional positions, even at the part time level, during the current fiscal year. The Public Works Department distribute CAL-OSHA safety books and posters as required by applicable laws. (Finding 13) Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. The Department has requested additional posters and safety books. While the City maintains Injury Prevention Program manuals in each department, additional publications from OSHA available through the State will be made available to employees in not only the Public Works Department, but also the Water and Sewer Departments. Police Department The Willits Police Department includes 15 sworn personnel, 3 community service officer positions, 5 dispatchers, 12 patrol vehicles, and no reserve officers. Relative to those findings made by the Grand Jury, the City offers the following responses: While the Grand Jury observed officers, they conducted their activities professionally with restraint and consideration to those being stopped and talked to or given notice or citations. Response: Agree with finding. The City remains proud of its officers and their ability to interact with the public in a professional and friendly manner. The Grand Jury’s attempted to interview citizens with a different perspective on the Police Department. Citizens refused to give details of their experiences with the Police Department because they said they fear retaliation. Persons interviewed by the Grand Jury were reluctant to file formal complaints because of fear of retaliation. Response: The Grand Jury’s findings lead the reader to believe that our community is unwilling to share their concerns about the Police Department because they “fear retaliation”. The City must respectfully disagree with this
F12
Page 64
Recently a member of the City Council resigned his position and immediately took a salaried position with the City. Although this did not violate the present policies and procedures of the City, it gave the appearance of conflict of interest. 64
Related Recommendations (2)
R7
Page 58
67 Response (City Council): The recommendation has already been implemented. The RCFPD has retrieved ISO rating information, has requested a rating review, and has been reviewed. Understanding the components that contribute to a reduced (better) ISO rating, the District is steadily working towards that end (i.e. standardized training with supporting documentation, regular water testing, increased water availability, etc.) F. The City complete and gather into one compendium policies and procedures for City elected officials, employees, commissions and citizen advisory groups. (Finding 8) Response (City Council): The recommendation will be implemented in the future. This will be accomplished by June 30, 2004, with the codification of ordinances (see B above). G. The City Council allow more flexible time for public comment during meetings. To allow more time for public comment, the City consider a separate Planning Commission meeting on a different day than the City Council meeting. (Finding 9) Response (City Council): This recommendation will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council sets a five-minute limitation on public comment under Privilege of the Floor for items not appearing on the Agenda. This limitation is not often adhered to and is used as a tool to maintain order and structure if necessary. Plus, the public is able to comment on Agenda items as they are discussed on the Agenda. Written comments from the public are also encouraged. The Council did have a separate Planning Commission but abandoned it after a five-year period because it 68 was becoming increasingly difficult to find people to serve on both the City Council and the Planning Commission. It is a small town and those willing to donate time to serve on boards are few. H. The City continue its efforts to enhance the emergency services program by dialog with the Emergency Services Authority in Ukiah. The City address issue of establishing and equipping an emergency shelter. (Finding 10) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The VFW Hall is used as a council meeting Chamber, a court, and as an emergency operation center. During an emergency, it will become the communication point for disaster/rescue related activity. It is outfitted with a generator, phone lines, emergency radios, etc. Separate from this facility, the Point Arena High School gymnasium is designated as a Red Cross emergency shelter. I. The City decide either to continue its efforts to reinstate the Arena Rescue boat to operational status, or discontinue the program and sell the boat. The Grand Jury encourages the City to give protection of coastal resources from oil spills a high priority in making its decision. (Finding 11) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The City recently received grant funds to upgrade the rescue boat. It has now been upgraded and is now back in operation. J. The City adopt a minimum time period after leaving office to restrict City elected officials in regard to accepting City employment. (Finding 12) 69 Response (City Council): This recommendation will be implemented in the future. A policy will be adopted no later than December 31, 2002. K. The City establish a capital improvement program in accordance with its General Plan goal. (Finding 13) Response (City Council): This policy will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council has developed a transportation plan, the wastewater treatment plant has a capital improvements program to ensure its future viability and the pier facility doesn’t generate enough revenue to provide for a complete capital improvements schedule. Outside funding must be sought for big-ticket capital improvement items at the pier facility. The California Department of Boating and Waterways has been contacted for possible funding for hoist upgrades. L. The city comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Comprehensive Access Plan. (Finding 14) Response (City Council): This recommendation has been partially implemented. The recommendation is vague. However, the City is currently working to install new sidewalks on a couple of residential streets that currently don’t have sidewalks. The City leases the City Hall and chambers from the County of Mendocino. Parking along Highway One (Main Street) is within the California Department of Transportation’s jurisdiction. The Pier Facility is handicapped accessible. Comment The Grand Jury commends the city government and citizenry of Point Arena on its completion and adoption of its General Plan, its efforts to establish its emergency services program, its successful petroleum and solid waste recycling program, its support of the Safe Passages program, and its sound fiscal management. The Grand Jury applauds the dedication of the virtually unpaid elected officials of the city and the dedication of its salaried employees as well. Misinformation and lack of communication between various factions of the citizenry and City government is endemic. The public does not regularly attend City Council meetings. The City Council in the past has had to appoint members because of lack of interest. The Grand Jury would remind the citizenry of Point Arena that “you get the government you deserve.” Supplemental Comments The Grand Jury attended the special joint meeting of the City of Point Arena and the Redwood Coast Fire Protection District on February 19, 2003 in which Point Arena considered the following positive steps to begin resolving the public safety issues in the Arena cove area. (1) The owners of the Wharfmaster’s Inn and Coast Guard House B&B agreed to upgrade their water storage to approximately 20,000 gallons with fire equipment access and hose connection access. 71 (2) The City of Point Arena and the owners of the aforementioned lodging establishments agreed to improve the secondary vehicle access to the Wharfmaster’s Inn. (3) The City of Point arena agreed to upgrade the main water transmission line supplying the Arena cove area, to assure adequate water pressure and volume. The plans are to be completed by August 19, 2003. (4) The City of Point Arena is to aggressively procure funding to complete the new water line. MENDOCINO COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION As a part of the Grand Jury’s routine oversight responsibilities as mandated by the California Penal Code, the 2002-2003 Grand Jury selected the Risk Management Division of the County of Mendocino Administrative Office. The primary, but not exclusive, focus of this review was to survey the various insurance and reinsurance programs managed by the Risk Management Office, review related and supporting programs, and look at the adverse impact of budgetary constraints on all areas of operations including staffing. Special emphasis was given to the General Liability Self-Insured Program. The Grand Jury did not review the administration of the Health Insurance Program. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION In accomplishing it’s review of the County Risk Management Division, the Grand Jury interviewed the County Risk Manager, The County Administrator, County Counsel, and selected Risk Management Staff. In addition, the Grand Jury reviewed the February 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self Insured Liability Program, the December 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability Program (Forecast for Policy Year 2003-2004), the most recent Liability Claim Audit of July 8, 2000, the most recent Budget Narrative, the March 2002 Workers’ 73 Compensation Claims Audit, the Return to Work Program, Policy Notebook, Property Schedule/Valuations Notebook, (CSAC) Insurance Program Notebook, CSAC Broker Activity Report, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Book, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Executive Committee Tentative Agenda Book, The Mendocino County Safety Manual, The 2002-2003 Division Budget, and applicable Mendocino County Ordinances.
R22
Page 64
There is no licensed holding cell or room on the coast., At times a patient will be held at the Sheriff’s substation in Fort Bragg or by the Fort Bragg Police, perhaps in the back of a patrol car, until a crises worker arrives. Response: Again, the City of Willits is not informed regarding facilities available on the Coast either at the Fort Bragg Police Department or the Sheriff’s Substation and therefore can neither agree nor disagree with the finding. With specific reference to the Grand Jury’s recommendations related to Mental Health Crisis Services, the City Council offers the following responses: Law enforcement agencies strengthen their partnership with the DMH and other mental health stakeholders. (Finding 5, 13) Response: The City of Willits supports the recommendation of the Grand Jury that we focus our efforts to strengthen the partnership between the Mental Health Department, law enforcement agencies, and mental health stakeholders. We are informed that the various agencies will meet in October in an effort to strengthen that partnership between and amongst the agencies. While further specific implementation time lines are anticipated to grow out of that October meeting, such activities and corresponding time lines are best identified by the Mental Health Department and law enforcement agency staff in partnership with other mental health stakeholders. At each opportunity the City of Willits will join its partner agencies throughout the County to achieve this purpose. The BOS fund training to improve understanding of the new procedures, to allow each group to appreciate the concepts and problems of the other, and to help clients to use all resources to the fullest. Response: This recommendation has been implemented, given the City’s understanding that the County will be funding the referenced training activities planned for October. The City of Willits will continue to work with other agencies and stakeholders in our common effort to understand new procedures and the issues confronting each stakeholder in the process. Thus, the recommendation has been implemented, and it is anticipated that other training opportunities will grow out of the planned October workshop. DMH, law enforcement, and hospital medical personnel meet on a regular basis to share knowledge and procedures in dealing with the mentally ill. (Findings 5, 13) Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. The Police Chief will advocate periodic meetings at the upcoming October stakeholders meeting to assure that all agencies and stakeholders are well informed. DMH and AODP integrate health services and substance abuse treatment (Finding 15) Response: It is the City’s belief that it cannot responsibly comment regarding the integration of services between two county departments. Clearly, public purposes are best served by a full integration and understanding of their programs and services. This recommendation, therefore, requires more study or analysis, yet such study and analysis is appropriately conducted by the Department of Mental Health and the Division of Alcohol and Other Drug Programs, with input from the various 105 other human service functions of the County, to assure as seamless a service delivery system as possible. WILLITS CITY GOVERNMENT City Administration City staff and Council Members enjoyed the opportunity to share our story with the Grand Jury and appreciate the time expended by the Grand Jury in completing its mission. The City Council offers the following responses for those findings relating to City administration: Willits has sound fiscal practices with an annual budget of $4.06 million, with a reserve of $415,000 for emergencies. Willits also had a carry over of $1.4 million from last fiscal year. Response: Agree with finding. Willits follows solid plans for operating the city and follows its policies and procedures. Response: Agree with finding. Appropriate departments handle all complaints quickly and efficiently. Response: Agree with finding. Willits is following its Ten Year Plan for improvements throughout the city. Response: Agree with finding. Willits is studying the possibilities for growth and new business. Response: Agree with finding. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the City of Willits are still working on the Willits 101 Bypass; construction has not been started. The Willits administration has supported the bypass, but some local citizens continue to request more information from Caltrans, stalling construction. The Caltrans Director signed the Draft Environmental Document for the Willits Bypass on May 13, 2002. Response: Agree with finding. It should be noted that since the Grand Jury Report was published, the Willits Bypass EIR has benefitted from several local meetings and public hearings designed to solicit comments on the Draft EIR prior to adoption of the Final EIR by Caltrans. Willits has a strategic plan that emphasizes ‘Business to Business’ (business suppliers) and bringing cottage industries to the downtown area. Response: Agree with finding. Willits administration is concerned that local media is not reporting the city’s successful programs. Response: Disagree with finding. While in past years the City has expressed concern regarding the accuracy of local media coverage of City programs and activities, the City’s current relationship with our local newspaper has improved significantly, enhanced through regular and ongoing communication. Because the Grand Jury has provided no recommendations regarding City administration, no responses are provided herein. City Public Works The City Council shares the belief that our Public Works Department functions well. Relative to the specific findings of the Grand Jury, we offer the following comments: The yard was clean and all equipment not in use was under cover. Response: Agree with finding. Public works maintains equipment properly. Response: Agree with finding. Public works does not have a common tracking system for all department data. Response: Disagree with finding in part. While project management systems relative to each area of responsibility are in place (parks, storm drains, streets, etc.), due to the diverse nature of the departmental responsibilities, no single common tracking system would fit the needs of each functional area. The Public Works Director advised the Grand Jury that the department needs one more technician and a clerical worker. Response: Agree with finding. During visits to the offices and shop areas, the Grand Jury saw no Cal-OSHA safety books or posters. Response: Agree with finding. The City offers the following responses regarding the recommendations of the Grand Jury: Public Works Department establish a system for tracking work orders. (Finding 11) Response: The recommendation requires more study and analysis. This recommendation addresses a tracking system as opposed to a “common tracking system” and therefore differs somewhat from Finding 11. However, the Department currently does track work orders utilizing a chronological/date system. The data content of the work orders (i.e., vehicle usage, excavation quantities, material use, etc.) would benefit from an improved tracking system. Creating a system that could track the work order data, as well as other administrative requirements, may prove difficult. However, implementation of a data tracking system will be evaluated utilizing Microsoft Access. Programming and setup of the system will require considerable staff time and some outside programming support. However, it is anticipated that such initial programming costs will be affordable within the current departmental budget, even though it is not specifically referenced as a contemplated expenditure during the current fiscal year. Because external support costs related to design of the tracking system will be relatively minor in nature, the Department is adjusting proposed expenditures in several line items in the current year to offset the cost of initiating this important project. Willits hire another technician and a clerical worker for the Public Works Department (Finding 12) Response: The recommendation has been implemented. The City has advertised to fill this additional Public Works position and has conducted interviews of applicants. Background checks of the most qualified applicants are currently underway. Funding of this position survived the budget challenges this past Spring, and we estimate bringing an individual on board to meet this need during the first or second week of September. Relative to the clerical worker position, no funding was included in the current year’s budget to address this need. In the interim, it is contemplated that clerical support available at City Hall will continue to, at least at a minimal level, address departmental needs. As the department prepares its budget requests for the 2003- 2004 fiscal year this next Spring, funding will be included in the departmental request to provide an appropriate level of clerical support in a departmentally specific way. It is anticipated that initially, should this position be funded, it would be part time with the goal of expanding it into a full time position at some point in the future when funding may be more accessible to the City. With the current City commitment to maintain programs which have been un-funded by the State due to its budget problems, the City is not in a position to authorize additional positions, even at the part time level, during the current fiscal year. The Public Works Department distribute CAL-OSHA safety books and posters as required by applicable laws. (Finding 13) Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. The Department has requested additional posters and safety books. While the City maintains Injury Prevention Program manuals in each department, additional publications from OSHA available through the State will be made available to employees in not only the Public Works Department, but also the Water and Sewer Departments. Police Department The Willits Police Department includes 15 sworn personnel, 3 community service officer positions, 5 dispatchers, 12 patrol vehicles, and no reserve officers. Relative to those findings made by the Grand Jury, the City offers the following responses: While the Grand Jury observed officers, they conducted their activities professionally with restraint and consideration to those being stopped and talked to or given notice or citations. Response: Agree with finding. The City remains proud of its officers and their ability to interact with the public in a professional and friendly manner. The Grand Jury’s attempted to interview citizens with a different perspective on the Police Department. Citizens refused to give details of their experiences with the Police Department because they said they fear retaliation. Persons interviewed by the Grand Jury were reluctant to file formal complaints because of fear of retaliation. Response: The Grand Jury’s findings lead the reader to believe that our community is unwilling to share their concerns about the Police Department because they “fear retaliation”. The City must respectfully disagree with this
F13
Page 65
The City General Plan lists a goal to establish a capital improvement plan.
Related Recommendations (2)
R7
Page 58
67 Response (City Council): The recommendation has already been implemented. The RCFPD has retrieved ISO rating information, has requested a rating review, and has been reviewed. Understanding the components that contribute to a reduced (better) ISO rating, the District is steadily working towards that end (i.e. standardized training with supporting documentation, regular water testing, increased water availability, etc.) F. The City complete and gather into one compendium policies and procedures for City elected officials, employees, commissions and citizen advisory groups. (Finding 8) Response (City Council): The recommendation will be implemented in the future. This will be accomplished by June 30, 2004, with the codification of ordinances (see B above). G. The City Council allow more flexible time for public comment during meetings. To allow more time for public comment, the City consider a separate Planning Commission meeting on a different day than the City Council meeting. (Finding 9) Response (City Council): This recommendation will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council sets a five-minute limitation on public comment under Privilege of the Floor for items not appearing on the Agenda. This limitation is not often adhered to and is used as a tool to maintain order and structure if necessary. Plus, the public is able to comment on Agenda items as they are discussed on the Agenda. Written comments from the public are also encouraged. The Council did have a separate Planning Commission but abandoned it after a five-year period because it 68 was becoming increasingly difficult to find people to serve on both the City Council and the Planning Commission. It is a small town and those willing to donate time to serve on boards are few. H. The City continue its efforts to enhance the emergency services program by dialog with the Emergency Services Authority in Ukiah. The City address issue of establishing and equipping an emergency shelter. (Finding 10) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The VFW Hall is used as a council meeting Chamber, a court, and as an emergency operation center. During an emergency, it will become the communication point for disaster/rescue related activity. It is outfitted with a generator, phone lines, emergency radios, etc. Separate from this facility, the Point Arena High School gymnasium is designated as a Red Cross emergency shelter. I. The City decide either to continue its efforts to reinstate the Arena Rescue boat to operational status, or discontinue the program and sell the boat. The Grand Jury encourages the City to give protection of coastal resources from oil spills a high priority in making its decision. (Finding 11) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The City recently received grant funds to upgrade the rescue boat. It has now been upgraded and is now back in operation. J. The City adopt a minimum time period after leaving office to restrict City elected officials in regard to accepting City employment. (Finding 12) 69 Response (City Council): This recommendation will be implemented in the future. A policy will be adopted no later than December 31, 2002. K. The City establish a capital improvement program in accordance with its General Plan goal. (Finding 13) Response (City Council): This policy will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council has developed a transportation plan, the wastewater treatment plant has a capital improvements program to ensure its future viability and the pier facility doesn’t generate enough revenue to provide for a complete capital improvements schedule. Outside funding must be sought for big-ticket capital improvement items at the pier facility. The California Department of Boating and Waterways has been contacted for possible funding for hoist upgrades. L. The city comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Comprehensive Access Plan. (Finding 14) Response (City Council): This recommendation has been partially implemented. The recommendation is vague. However, the City is currently working to install new sidewalks on a couple of residential streets that currently don’t have sidewalks. The City leases the City Hall and chambers from the County of Mendocino. Parking along Highway One (Main Street) is within the California Department of Transportation’s jurisdiction. The Pier Facility is handicapped accessible. Comment The Grand Jury commends the city government and citizenry of Point Arena on its completion and adoption of its General Plan, its efforts to establish its emergency services program, its successful petroleum and solid waste recycling program, its support of the Safe Passages program, and its sound fiscal management. The Grand Jury applauds the dedication of the virtually unpaid elected officials of the city and the dedication of its salaried employees as well. Misinformation and lack of communication between various factions of the citizenry and City government is endemic. The public does not regularly attend City Council meetings. The City Council in the past has had to appoint members because of lack of interest. The Grand Jury would remind the citizenry of Point Arena that “you get the government you deserve.” Supplemental Comments The Grand Jury attended the special joint meeting of the City of Point Arena and the Redwood Coast Fire Protection District on February 19, 2003 in which Point Arena considered the following positive steps to begin resolving the public safety issues in the Arena cove area. (1) The owners of the Wharfmaster’s Inn and Coast Guard House B&B agreed to upgrade their water storage to approximately 20,000 gallons with fire equipment access and hose connection access. 71 (2) The City of Point Arena and the owners of the aforementioned lodging establishments agreed to improve the secondary vehicle access to the Wharfmaster’s Inn. (3) The City of Point arena agreed to upgrade the main water transmission line supplying the Arena cove area, to assure adequate water pressure and volume. The plans are to be completed by August 19, 2003. (4) The City of Point Arena is to aggressively procure funding to complete the new water line. MENDOCINO COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION As a part of the Grand Jury’s routine oversight responsibilities as mandated by the California Penal Code, the 2002-2003 Grand Jury selected the Risk Management Division of the County of Mendocino Administrative Office. The primary, but not exclusive, focus of this review was to survey the various insurance and reinsurance programs managed by the Risk Management Office, review related and supporting programs, and look at the adverse impact of budgetary constraints on all areas of operations including staffing. Special emphasis was given to the General Liability Self-Insured Program. The Grand Jury did not review the administration of the Health Insurance Program. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION In accomplishing it’s review of the County Risk Management Division, the Grand Jury interviewed the County Risk Manager, The County Administrator, County Counsel, and selected Risk Management Staff. In addition, the Grand Jury reviewed the February 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self Insured Liability Program, the December 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability Program (Forecast for Policy Year 2003-2004), the most recent Liability Claim Audit of July 8, 2000, the most recent Budget Narrative, the March 2002 Workers’ 73 Compensation Claims Audit, the Return to Work Program, Policy Notebook, Property Schedule/Valuations Notebook, (CSAC) Insurance Program Notebook, CSAC Broker Activity Report, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Book, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Executive Committee Tentative Agenda Book, The Mendocino County Safety Manual, The 2002-2003 Division Budget, and applicable Mendocino County Ordinances.
R22
Page 64
There is no licensed holding cell or room on the coast., At times a patient will be held at the Sheriff’s substation in Fort Bragg or by the Fort Bragg Police, perhaps in the back of a patrol car, until a crises worker arrives. Response: Again, the City of Willits is not informed regarding facilities available on the Coast either at the Fort Bragg Police Department or the Sheriff’s Substation and therefore can neither agree nor disagree with the finding. With specific reference to the Grand Jury’s recommendations related to Mental Health Crisis Services, the City Council offers the following responses: Law enforcement agencies strengthen their partnership with the DMH and other mental health stakeholders. (Finding 5, 13) Response: The City of Willits supports the recommendation of the Grand Jury that we focus our efforts to strengthen the partnership between the Mental Health Department, law enforcement agencies, and mental health stakeholders. We are informed that the various agencies will meet in October in an effort to strengthen that partnership between and amongst the agencies. While further specific implementation time lines are anticipated to grow out of that October meeting, such activities and corresponding time lines are best identified by the Mental Health Department and law enforcement agency staff in partnership with other mental health stakeholders. At each opportunity the City of Willits will join its partner agencies throughout the County to achieve this purpose. The BOS fund training to improve understanding of the new procedures, to allow each group to appreciate the concepts and problems of the other, and to help clients to use all resources to the fullest. Response: This recommendation has been implemented, given the City’s understanding that the County will be funding the referenced training activities planned for October. The City of Willits will continue to work with other agencies and stakeholders in our common effort to understand new procedures and the issues confronting each stakeholder in the process. Thus, the recommendation has been implemented, and it is anticipated that other training opportunities will grow out of the planned October workshop. DMH, law enforcement, and hospital medical personnel meet on a regular basis to share knowledge and procedures in dealing with the mentally ill. (Findings 5, 13) Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. The Police Chief will advocate periodic meetings at the upcoming October stakeholders meeting to assure that all agencies and stakeholders are well informed. DMH and AODP integrate health services and substance abuse treatment (Finding 15) Response: It is the City’s belief that it cannot responsibly comment regarding the integration of services between two county departments. Clearly, public purposes are best served by a full integration and understanding of their programs and services. This recommendation, therefore, requires more study or analysis, yet such study and analysis is appropriately conducted by the Department of Mental Health and the Division of Alcohol and Other Drug Programs, with input from the various 105 other human service functions of the County, to assure as seamless a service delivery system as possible. WILLITS CITY GOVERNMENT City Administration City staff and Council Members enjoyed the opportunity to share our story with the Grand Jury and appreciate the time expended by the Grand Jury in completing its mission. The City Council offers the following responses for those findings relating to City administration: Willits has sound fiscal practices with an annual budget of $4.06 million, with a reserve of $415,000 for emergencies. Willits also had a carry over of $1.4 million from last fiscal year. Response: Agree with finding. Willits follows solid plans for operating the city and follows its policies and procedures. Response: Agree with finding. Appropriate departments handle all complaints quickly and efficiently. Response: Agree with finding. Willits is following its Ten Year Plan for improvements throughout the city. Response: Agree with finding. Willits is studying the possibilities for growth and new business. Response: Agree with finding. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the City of Willits are still working on the Willits 101 Bypass; construction has not been started. The Willits administration has supported the bypass, but some local citizens continue to request more information from Caltrans, stalling construction. The Caltrans Director signed the Draft Environmental Document for the Willits Bypass on May 13, 2002. Response: Agree with finding. It should be noted that since the Grand Jury Report was published, the Willits Bypass EIR has benefitted from several local meetings and public hearings designed to solicit comments on the Draft EIR prior to adoption of the Final EIR by Caltrans. Willits has a strategic plan that emphasizes ‘Business to Business’ (business suppliers) and bringing cottage industries to the downtown area. Response: Agree with finding. Willits administration is concerned that local media is not reporting the city’s successful programs. Response: Disagree with finding. While in past years the City has expressed concern regarding the accuracy of local media coverage of City programs and activities, the City’s current relationship with our local newspaper has improved significantly, enhanced through regular and ongoing communication. Because the Grand Jury has provided no recommendations regarding City administration, no responses are provided herein. City Public Works The City Council shares the belief that our Public Works Department functions well. Relative to the specific findings of the Grand Jury, we offer the following comments: The yard was clean and all equipment not in use was under cover. Response: Agree with finding. Public works maintains equipment properly. Response: Agree with finding. Public works does not have a common tracking system for all department data. Response: Disagree with finding in part. While project management systems relative to each area of responsibility are in place (parks, storm drains, streets, etc.), due to the diverse nature of the departmental responsibilities, no single common tracking system would fit the needs of each functional area. The Public Works Director advised the Grand Jury that the department needs one more technician and a clerical worker. Response: Agree with finding. During visits to the offices and shop areas, the Grand Jury saw no Cal-OSHA safety books or posters. Response: Agree with finding. The City offers the following responses regarding the recommendations of the Grand Jury: Public Works Department establish a system for tracking work orders. (Finding 11) Response: The recommendation requires more study and analysis. This recommendation addresses a tracking system as opposed to a “common tracking system” and therefore differs somewhat from Finding 11. However, the Department currently does track work orders utilizing a chronological/date system. The data content of the work orders (i.e., vehicle usage, excavation quantities, material use, etc.) would benefit from an improved tracking system. Creating a system that could track the work order data, as well as other administrative requirements, may prove difficult. However, implementation of a data tracking system will be evaluated utilizing Microsoft Access. Programming and setup of the system will require considerable staff time and some outside programming support. However, it is anticipated that such initial programming costs will be affordable within the current departmental budget, even though it is not specifically referenced as a contemplated expenditure during the current fiscal year. Because external support costs related to design of the tracking system will be relatively minor in nature, the Department is adjusting proposed expenditures in several line items in the current year to offset the cost of initiating this important project. Willits hire another technician and a clerical worker for the Public Works Department (Finding 12) Response: The recommendation has been implemented. The City has advertised to fill this additional Public Works position and has conducted interviews of applicants. Background checks of the most qualified applicants are currently underway. Funding of this position survived the budget challenges this past Spring, and we estimate bringing an individual on board to meet this need during the first or second week of September. Relative to the clerical worker position, no funding was included in the current year’s budget to address this need. In the interim, it is contemplated that clerical support available at City Hall will continue to, at least at a minimal level, address departmental needs. As the department prepares its budget requests for the 2003- 2004 fiscal year this next Spring, funding will be included in the departmental request to provide an appropriate level of clerical support in a departmentally specific way. It is anticipated that initially, should this position be funded, it would be part time with the goal of expanding it into a full time position at some point in the future when funding may be more accessible to the City. With the current City commitment to maintain programs which have been un-funded by the State due to its budget problems, the City is not in a position to authorize additional positions, even at the part time level, during the current fiscal year. The Public Works Department distribute CAL-OSHA safety books and posters as required by applicable laws. (Finding 13) Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. The Department has requested additional posters and safety books. While the City maintains Injury Prevention Program manuals in each department, additional publications from OSHA available through the State will be made available to employees in not only the Public Works Department, but also the Water and Sewer Departments. Police Department The Willits Police Department includes 15 sworn personnel, 3 community service officer positions, 5 dispatchers, 12 patrol vehicles, and no reserve officers. Relative to those findings made by the Grand Jury, the City offers the following responses: While the Grand Jury observed officers, they conducted their activities professionally with restraint and consideration to those being stopped and talked to or given notice or citations. Response: Agree with finding. The City remains proud of its officers and their ability to interact with the public in a professional and friendly manner. The Grand Jury’s attempted to interview citizens with a different perspective on the Police Department. Citizens refused to give details of their experiences with the Police Department because they said they fear retaliation. Persons interviewed by the Grand Jury were reluctant to file formal complaints because of fear of retaliation. Response: The Grand Jury’s findings lead the reader to believe that our community is unwilling to share their concerns about the Police Department because they “fear retaliation”. The City must respectfully disagree with this
F14
Page 65
Areas within the City limits are not totally in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act Comprehensive Access Plan. Violations include lack of handicap or wheelchair access, parking, and signs. Responses to Findings 1 through 14 No legal response received by deadline.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
Page 58
67 Response (City Council): The recommendation has already been implemented. The RCFPD has retrieved ISO rating information, has requested a rating review, and has been reviewed. Understanding the components that contribute to a reduced (better) ISO rating, the District is steadily working towards that end (i.e. standardized training with supporting documentation, regular water testing, increased water availability, etc.) F. The City complete and gather into one compendium policies and procedures for City elected officials, employees, commissions and citizen advisory groups. (Finding 8) Response (City Council): The recommendation will be implemented in the future. This will be accomplished by June 30, 2004, with the codification of ordinances (see B above). G. The City Council allow more flexible time for public comment during meetings. To allow more time for public comment, the City consider a separate Planning Commission meeting on a different day than the City Council meeting. (Finding 9) Response (City Council): This recommendation will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council sets a five-minute limitation on public comment under Privilege of the Floor for items not appearing on the Agenda. This limitation is not often adhered to and is used as a tool to maintain order and structure if necessary. Plus, the public is able to comment on Agenda items as they are discussed on the Agenda. Written comments from the public are also encouraged. The Council did have a separate Planning Commission but abandoned it after a five-year period because it 68 was becoming increasingly difficult to find people to serve on both the City Council and the Planning Commission. It is a small town and those willing to donate time to serve on boards are few. H. The City continue its efforts to enhance the emergency services program by dialog with the Emergency Services Authority in Ukiah. The City address issue of establishing and equipping an emergency shelter. (Finding 10) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The VFW Hall is used as a council meeting Chamber, a court, and as an emergency operation center. During an emergency, it will become the communication point for disaster/rescue related activity. It is outfitted with a generator, phone lines, emergency radios, etc. Separate from this facility, the Point Arena High School gymnasium is designated as a Red Cross emergency shelter. I. The City decide either to continue its efforts to reinstate the Arena Rescue boat to operational status, or discontinue the program and sell the boat. The Grand Jury encourages the City to give protection of coastal resources from oil spills a high priority in making its decision. (Finding 11) Response (City Council): This recommendation has already been implemented. The City recently received grant funds to upgrade the rescue boat. It has now been upgraded and is now back in operation. J. The City adopt a minimum time period after leaving office to restrict City elected officials in regard to accepting City employment. (Finding 12) 69 Response (City Council): This recommendation will be implemented in the future. A policy will be adopted no later than December 31, 2002. K. The City establish a capital improvement program in accordance with its General Plan goal. (Finding 13) Response (City Council): This policy will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The City Council has developed a transportation plan, the wastewater treatment plant has a capital improvements program to ensure its future viability and the pier facility doesn’t generate enough revenue to provide for a complete capital improvements schedule. Outside funding must be sought for big-ticket capital improvement items at the pier facility. The California Department of Boating and Waterways has been contacted for possible funding for hoist upgrades. L. The city comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Comprehensive Access Plan. (Finding 14) Response (City Council): This recommendation has been partially implemented. The recommendation is vague. However, the City is currently working to install new sidewalks on a couple of residential streets that currently don’t have sidewalks. The City leases the City Hall and chambers from the County of Mendocino. Parking along Highway One (Main Street) is within the California Department of Transportation’s jurisdiction. The Pier Facility is handicapped accessible. Comment The Grand Jury commends the city government and citizenry of Point Arena on its completion and adoption of its General Plan, its efforts to establish its emergency services program, its successful petroleum and solid waste recycling program, its support of the Safe Passages program, and its sound fiscal management. The Grand Jury applauds the dedication of the virtually unpaid elected officials of the city and the dedication of its salaried employees as well. Misinformation and lack of communication between various factions of the citizenry and City government is endemic. The public does not regularly attend City Council meetings. The City Council in the past has had to appoint members because of lack of interest. The Grand Jury would remind the citizenry of Point Arena that “you get the government you deserve.” Supplemental Comments The Grand Jury attended the special joint meeting of the City of Point Arena and the Redwood Coast Fire Protection District on February 19, 2003 in which Point Arena considered the following positive steps to begin resolving the public safety issues in the Arena cove area. (1) The owners of the Wharfmaster’s Inn and Coast Guard House B&B agreed to upgrade their water storage to approximately 20,000 gallons with fire equipment access and hose connection access. 71 (2) The City of Point Arena and the owners of the aforementioned lodging establishments agreed to improve the secondary vehicle access to the Wharfmaster’s Inn. (3) The City of Point arena agreed to upgrade the main water transmission line supplying the Arena cove area, to assure adequate water pressure and volume. The plans are to be completed by August 19, 2003. (4) The City of Point Arena is to aggressively procure funding to complete the new water line. MENDOCINO COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION As a part of the Grand Jury’s routine oversight responsibilities as mandated by the California Penal Code, the 2002-2003 Grand Jury selected the Risk Management Division of the County of Mendocino Administrative Office. The primary, but not exclusive, focus of this review was to survey the various insurance and reinsurance programs managed by the Risk Management Office, review related and supporting programs, and look at the adverse impact of budgetary constraints on all areas of operations including staffing. Special emphasis was given to the General Liability Self-Insured Program. The Grand Jury did not review the administration of the Health Insurance Program. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION In accomplishing it’s review of the County Risk Management Division, the Grand Jury interviewed the County Risk Manager, The County Administrator, County Counsel, and selected Risk Management Staff. In addition, the Grand Jury reviewed the February 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self Insured Liability Program, the December 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability Program (Forecast for Policy Year 2003-2004), the most recent Liability Claim Audit of July 8, 2000, the most recent Budget Narrative, the March 2002 Workers’ 73 Compensation Claims Audit, the Return to Work Program, Policy Notebook, Property Schedule/Valuations Notebook, (CSAC) Insurance Program Notebook, CSAC Broker Activity Report, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Book, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Executive Committee Tentative Agenda Book, The Mendocino County Safety Manual, The 2002-2003 Division Budget, and applicable Mendocino County Ordinances.
F15
Page 103
There is a strong connection between mental illness and substance abuse. Clients in crisis typically exhibit a multitude of problems in addition to the ones that have brought them to the immediate crises. These include homelessness, health, employment, and childcare. DMH has recognized the multiple layers of need with the creation of a new position, Consumer Services Coordinator, with the job of ensuring that the clients receive the help needed from whatever source is available. However, some clients exhibiting aberrant behavior are sometimes shuffled back and forth between AODP and DMH. Response – Agree.
Related Recommendations (1)
R22
Page 64
There is no licensed holding cell or room on the coast., At times a patient will be held at the Sheriff’s substation in Fort Bragg or by the Fort Bragg Police, perhaps in the back of a patrol car, until a crises worker arrives. Response: Again, the City of Willits is not informed regarding facilities available on the Coast either at the Fort Bragg Police Department or the Sheriff’s Substation and therefore can neither agree nor disagree with the finding. With specific reference to the Grand Jury’s recommendations related to Mental Health Crisis Services, the City Council offers the following responses: Law enforcement agencies strengthen their partnership with the DMH and other mental health stakeholders. (Finding 5, 13) Response: The City of Willits supports the recommendation of the Grand Jury that we focus our efforts to strengthen the partnership between the Mental Health Department, law enforcement agencies, and mental health stakeholders. We are informed that the various agencies will meet in October in an effort to strengthen that partnership between and amongst the agencies. While further specific implementation time lines are anticipated to grow out of that October meeting, such activities and corresponding time lines are best identified by the Mental Health Department and law enforcement agency staff in partnership with other mental health stakeholders. At each opportunity the City of Willits will join its partner agencies throughout the County to achieve this purpose. The BOS fund training to improve understanding of the new procedures, to allow each group to appreciate the concepts and problems of the other, and to help clients to use all resources to the fullest. Response: This recommendation has been implemented, given the City’s understanding that the County will be funding the referenced training activities planned for October. The City of Willits will continue to work with other agencies and stakeholders in our common effort to understand new procedures and the issues confronting each stakeholder in the process. Thus, the recommendation has been implemented, and it is anticipated that other training opportunities will grow out of the planned October workshop. DMH, law enforcement, and hospital medical personnel meet on a regular basis to share knowledge and procedures in dealing with the mentally ill. (Findings 5, 13) Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. The Police Chief will advocate periodic meetings at the upcoming October stakeholders meeting to assure that all agencies and stakeholders are well informed. DMH and AODP integrate health services and substance abuse treatment (Finding 15) Response: It is the City’s belief that it cannot responsibly comment regarding the integration of services between two county departments. Clearly, public purposes are best served by a full integration and understanding of their programs and services. This recommendation, therefore, requires more study or analysis, yet such study and analysis is appropriately conducted by the Department of Mental Health and the Division of Alcohol and Other Drug Programs, with input from the various 105 other human service functions of the County, to assure as seamless a service delivery system as possible. WILLITS CITY GOVERNMENT City Administration City staff and Council Members enjoyed the opportunity to share our story with the Grand Jury and appreciate the time expended by the Grand Jury in completing its mission. The City Council offers the following responses for those findings relating to City administration: Willits has sound fiscal practices with an annual budget of $4.06 million, with a reserve of $415,000 for emergencies. Willits also had a carry over of $1.4 million from last fiscal year. Response: Agree with finding. Willits follows solid plans for operating the city and follows its policies and procedures. Response: Agree with finding. Appropriate departments handle all complaints quickly and efficiently. Response: Agree with finding. Willits is following its Ten Year Plan for improvements throughout the city. Response: Agree with finding. Willits is studying the possibilities for growth and new business. Response: Agree with finding. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the City of Willits are still working on the Willits 101 Bypass; construction has not been started. The Willits administration has supported the bypass, but some local citizens continue to request more information from Caltrans, stalling construction. The Caltrans Director signed the Draft Environmental Document for the Willits Bypass on May 13, 2002. Response: Agree with finding. It should be noted that since the Grand Jury Report was published, the Willits Bypass EIR has benefitted from several local meetings and public hearings designed to solicit comments on the Draft EIR prior to adoption of the Final EIR by Caltrans. Willits has a strategic plan that emphasizes ‘Business to Business’ (business suppliers) and bringing cottage industries to the downtown area. Response: Agree with finding. Willits administration is concerned that local media is not reporting the city’s successful programs. Response: Disagree with finding. While in past years the City has expressed concern regarding the accuracy of local media coverage of City programs and activities, the City’s current relationship with our local newspaper has improved significantly, enhanced through regular and ongoing communication. Because the Grand Jury has provided no recommendations regarding City administration, no responses are provided herein. City Public Works The City Council shares the belief that our Public Works Department functions well. Relative to the specific findings of the Grand Jury, we offer the following comments: The yard was clean and all equipment not in use was under cover. Response: Agree with finding. Public works maintains equipment properly. Response: Agree with finding. Public works does not have a common tracking system for all department data. Response: Disagree with finding in part. While project management systems relative to each area of responsibility are in place (parks, storm drains, streets, etc.), due to the diverse nature of the departmental responsibilities, no single common tracking system would fit the needs of each functional area. The Public Works Director advised the Grand Jury that the department needs one more technician and a clerical worker. Response: Agree with finding. During visits to the offices and shop areas, the Grand Jury saw no Cal-OSHA safety books or posters. Response: Agree with finding. The City offers the following responses regarding the recommendations of the Grand Jury: Public Works Department establish a system for tracking work orders. (Finding 11) Response: The recommendation requires more study and analysis. This recommendation addresses a tracking system as opposed to a “common tracking system” and therefore differs somewhat from Finding 11. However, the Department currently does track work orders utilizing a chronological/date system. The data content of the work orders (i.e., vehicle usage, excavation quantities, material use, etc.) would benefit from an improved tracking system. Creating a system that could track the work order data, as well as other administrative requirements, may prove difficult. However, implementation of a data tracking system will be evaluated utilizing Microsoft Access. Programming and setup of the system will require considerable staff time and some outside programming support. However, it is anticipated that such initial programming costs will be affordable within the current departmental budget, even though it is not specifically referenced as a contemplated expenditure during the current fiscal year. Because external support costs related to design of the tracking system will be relatively minor in nature, the Department is adjusting proposed expenditures in several line items in the current year to offset the cost of initiating this important project. Willits hire another technician and a clerical worker for the Public Works Department (Finding 12) Response: The recommendation has been implemented. The City has advertised to fill this additional Public Works position and has conducted interviews of applicants. Background checks of the most qualified applicants are currently underway. Funding of this position survived the budget challenges this past Spring, and we estimate bringing an individual on board to meet this need during the first or second week of September. Relative to the clerical worker position, no funding was included in the current year’s budget to address this need. In the interim, it is contemplated that clerical support available at City Hall will continue to, at least at a minimal level, address departmental needs. As the department prepares its budget requests for the 2003- 2004 fiscal year this next Spring, funding will be included in the departmental request to provide an appropriate level of clerical support in a departmentally specific way. It is anticipated that initially, should this position be funded, it would be part time with the goal of expanding it into a full time position at some point in the future when funding may be more accessible to the City. With the current City commitment to maintain programs which have been un-funded by the State due to its budget problems, the City is not in a position to authorize additional positions, even at the part time level, during the current fiscal year. The Public Works Department distribute CAL-OSHA safety books and posters as required by applicable laws. (Finding 13) Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. The Department has requested additional posters and safety books. While the City maintains Injury Prevention Program manuals in each department, additional publications from OSHA available through the State will be made available to employees in not only the Public Works Department, but also the Water and Sewer Departments. Police Department The Willits Police Department includes 15 sworn personnel, 3 community service officer positions, 5 dispatchers, 12 patrol vehicles, and no reserve officers. Relative to those findings made by the Grand Jury, the City offers the following responses: While the Grand Jury observed officers, they conducted their activities professionally with restraint and consideration to those being stopped and talked to or given notice or citations. Response: Agree with finding. The City remains proud of its officers and their ability to interact with the public in a professional and friendly manner. The Grand Jury’s attempted to interview citizens with a different perspective on the Police Department. Citizens refused to give details of their experiences with the Police Department because they said they fear retaliation. Persons interviewed by the Grand Jury were reluctant to file formal complaints because of fear of retaliation. Response: The Grand Jury’s findings lead the reader to believe that our community is unwilling to share their concerns about the Police Department because they “fear retaliation”. The City must respectfully disagree with this
F16
Page 103
With the PHF no longer available, the need for costly transportation of patients out of the county has increased. Both the Sheriff and the DMH have standby transportation staff and/or ambulances available (if restraint is required) to transport patients to out-of- county psychiatric facilities. Response – Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F17
Page 103
Redwood Coast Regional Center, DMH, and the Sheriff are collaborating in a unique grant-funded training program to bring more understanding of the relationship of law enforcement and the developmentally disabled and the mentally ill. A private training group from the Bay Area has been conducting the training. Response – Agree. On April 11, 2002 the Fort Bragg Police Department provided an instructor for a presentation on this subject matter to Critical Focus. The presentation was made at the Fort Bragg Police Department.
No recommendations for this finding
F18
Page 103
DMH has in place tools for evaluation, such as the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire and the California Quality of Life instrument. The Mental Health Board is planning to evaluate client satisfaction. Response – Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F19
Page 104
The Grand Jury has heard testimony that the impact of the new procedures on Fort Bragg and the coastal areas of the County have been mixed. The Fort Bragg area had in place, prior to the closure of the PHF, a system for crisis response that has not changed. The Fort Bragg office of the DMH has employees to respond to crisis calls Monday to Friday 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. The County has a contract with Ford Street Project, a private non-profit human service organization, to provide crisis response during all other times. DMH supervisors are available for telephone consultation with the Ford Street crisis workers. The Ford Street Project also provides three beds for “time-out” cases in the same situations now available at the CSC. The primary change has been for §5150 cases, which require a custodial setting. Information from crisis workers on the coast – 128 – indicates without a PHF, it sometimes takes longer to find a placement for persons who must be detained under §5150 because they must be taken out of the county. Response – Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F20
Page 104
There are currently three on-call crisis workers who are employed in other human service jobs. They participate in continual training and case conferences and are supervised by on-call DMH personnel. Often the crisis workers have extensive prior knowledge of the client and the needs of the case, thus facilitating decision-making. Response – Agree. The Fort Bragg Police Department works closely with the Coast Crisis Service providers and relies on their specialized training and prior knowledge of client needs to facilitate appropriate service and decision making regarding mentally ill persons.
No recommendations for this finding
F21
Page 104
Other partners in the process, law enforcement and hospital medical staff, at times, question the qualifications and decisions made by the crisis workers. On the other hand, crisis workers feel that police officers and emergency room staff do not understand the requirements and consequences of a §5150 detention nor the difficulty in diagnosing a mental disorder. Response –Agree. The criteria for the application of a §5150 hold for law enforcement although narrow still leaves open the possibility of differences of opinion between evaluators. It’s not uncommon that the symptoms exhibited in the presence of the first responder (usually law enforcement) are masked by the person being evaluated when he/she realizes a §5150 hold may be forthcoming. It’s important to remember that a §5150 hold is not a commitment, but is rather a vehicle to get the person in question into a professional evaluation environment. As much as it would be desirable that those evaluating the need for the §5150 hold have a uniform opinion, differences as to the suitability of a hold are likely to continue. As with most issues, the key to reducing the frustrations associated with these differences lies in effective communication.
No recommendations for this finding
F22
Page 104
There is no licensed holding cell or room on the coast. At times a patient will be held at the Sheriff’s substation in Fort Bragg or by the Fort Bragg Police, perhaps in the back of a patrol car, until a crises worker arrives. Response – Agree. This situation does occur, but during the past year incidents wherein this has been necessary have been reduced within the Fort Bragg jurisdiction. Our officers report that the response time for the crises worker to arrive on scene has improved. – 129 –
No recommendations for this finding
Additional Recommendations 20
These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.
-
R1Page 55Mental Health Crisis Services
-
R2Page 55Willits City Government
-
R3Page 55Domestic Violence Restraining Orders As required by Penal Code Section 933 et seq., the City provided the comments below on the
-
R4Page 54E. The Mendocino County Employees Retirement Association Board of Directors, in conjunction with their actuaries, quickly develop “preliminary” estimates of the 6/30/02 and a “pro-forma” of the 6/30/03 and 6/30/04 Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability numbers, and immediately present to the County Board of Supervisors for their information and budget planning processes. (Findings 6 through 12) F. The Board of Supervisors in conjunction with the Association Board and Plan Administrator develop both a tactical and strategic plan for fully funding the Actuarial Accrued Liability and, thus eliminating the UAAL. This process should include the professional exploration of other options such as CALPERS as opposed to the present independent system. While the Grand Jury has no judgement about the feasibility of such a move, it would seem appropriate to explore such options from time to time. An outside consultant would be helpful in this regard. (Findings 6 through 12) COMMENTS By continuing to carry an ongoing and increasing UAAL, the Board of Supervisors, whether intentional or not, is effectively subsidizing the County’s fiscal budget with monies that should have been allocated each year to adequately fund the Retirement Association. Additionally, it would seem that while another Pension Obligation Bond would solve the Board of Supervisors funding problem in the near term, it is only a band-aid that does not address all the forces that are driving the UAAL ever higher. It should also be noted that in so doing, the County Board of Supervisors would, again, be shifting the financial burden for past (retirement fund) liabilities to future generations of taxpayers with no guarantee that accrued future benefits would be funded on a “pay as you go”, or incurred basis. While this kind of financial “logic” is common practice at the Federal level, the Grand Jury feels that the notion of constantly pushing the payment of past obligations, (accrued benefits), into the future is a financial philosophy that is not sound for the plan participants or the Mendocino County taxpayers. Special Note: The Grand Jury wishes to acknowledge the current actions of the Pension Administrator, the Pension Board, the County Board of Supervisors and many others in defining and working toward resolving the difficult and complex problem of Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability. This “work in progress” is not only taking place as this report is being written, but will, of necessity, require continuing attention on an annual basis. Additionally, it is probable that by the time this report is published, there may be significant changes in the status of the problems identified and potential solutions. RESPONSE REQUIRED Mendocino County Board of Supervisors Mendocino County Employees Retirement Association Board Mendocino County Counsel RESPONSE REQUESTED Association Investment Advisor Association Actuarial Firm 96 Mendocino County Juvenile Hall The Mendocino County Juvenile Hall (MCJH), under the direction of the Probation Department, provides for the physical and emotional care of incarcerated youth in Mendocino County. The Grand Jury reviewed the recent changes involving youth classified as Code I (maximum security), Code II (medium security), and Code III (committed a violent crime). Method of investigation The Grand Jury (GJ) interviewed the Superintendent, several staff members (male and female), made a complete tour of the facilities and reviewed the California Code of Regulations: Minimum Standards for Juveniles Facilities Title 15, Section 1313, 1371 and 1488, Building Standard Title 14.
-
R5Page 58DMH, law enforcement, and hospital staff, do not meet regularly to share knowledge and procedures. Agencies confer on a case-by-case basis. Response: Agree with finding.
-
R6Page 58The CSC, located at 860 North Bush Street in Ukiah, in the government complex, went into full operation in the middle of October 2001. Response: Agree with finding.
-
R8Page 59A CSC worker’s duties include evaluation, intervention, placement at a contract psychiatric hospital for 72-hour evaluation under Section 5150, and planning for discharge from the center to follow-up services. Response: Agree with finding.
-
R9Page 59The policy statement for the CSC includes job descriptions for all staff, definition and philosophy of the recovery model concept of treatment, and details of operations. Response: Agree with finding.
-
R10Page 59State regulations require the County to provide a Patient Rights Advocate. The patient rights advocate office is now in the CSC, a partial implementation of a 2002-2001 Grand Jury recommendation. Response: Agree with finding.
-
R11Page 60The CSC has developed a transportation system to drive clients to out of county psychiatric facilities thus relieving the sheriff from that duty except when the client requires a law enforcement escort. These workers will also have other duties at the center. Response: Agree with finding.
-
R12Page 60The CSC is officially designated under State of California guidelines as a Community Mental Health Clinic in which client services are billed under Medi-Cal regulations. It is anticipated that the final costs to the County could be reduced while at the same time providing better services to the mentally ill. Response: The City is not informed regarding Medi-Cal regulations and therefore does not have the necessary information required to either agree or disagree with the finding.
-
R13Page 61Records indicate that as many as one in four inmates housed at the Jail have mental health issues. When the PHF was closed, officers no longer had a secure facility to leave people who needed evaluation. Patrol Officers reported being out of normal service while they waited for mental health crises workers to respond to the hospital emergency rooms to evaluate and assume custody of the client. In addition, mental health or law enforcement staff time had to be increased to transport patients to out of county psychiatric facilities. Response: Agree with finding. 102
-
R14Page 61With the assignment of DMH personnel to the Jail and the ability of the CSC to send crisis workers to the jail after regular working hours, Jail workers believe the treatment of inmates with mental health issues has improved. Response: Again, the City does not have enough information to respond in an informed way to this finding. Clearly, the Sheriff’s Department staff managing inmates on a regular basis are best prepared to respond to issues regarding mental health treatment concerns. Therefore, in the absence of specific experience and
-
R15Page 62There is a strong connection between mental illness and substance abuse. Clients in crisis typically exhibit a multitude of problems in addition to the ones the have brought them to the immediate crises. These include homelessness, health, employment, and childcare. DMH has recognized the multiple layers of need with the creation of a new position, Consumer Services Coordinator, with the job of ensuring that the clients receive the help needed from whatever source is available. However, some clients exhibiting aberrant behavior are sometimes shuffled back and forth between AODP and DMH. Response: Agree with finding.
-
R16Page 62With the PHF no longer available, the need for costly transportation of patients out of the county has increased. Both the Sheriff and DMH have standby transportation staff and/or ambulances available (if restraint is required) to transport patients to out-of-county psychiatric facilities. Response: Again, the City is not informed regarding out-of-County transport requirements for patients, and therefore is not in a position to either agree or disagree with the finding.
-
R17Page 62Redwood Coast Regional Center, DMH, and the Sheriff are collaborating in a unique grant-funded training program to bring more understanding of the relationship of law enforcement and the developmentally disabled and the mentally ill. A private training group from the Bay Area has been conducting the training. Response: The City of Willits Police Department has not been involved in the grant funded training programs described, and therefore can neither agree nor disagree with the finding. However, to the extent such training programs may become available to City law enforcement personnel, our mental health crisis training will be enhanced.
-
R18Page 62DMH has in place tools for evaluation, such as the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire and the California Quality of Life instrument. The Mental Health Board is planning to evaluate client satisfaction. Response: Agree with finding, but have no specific information regarding the Mental Health Board’s plans to evaluate client satisfaction.
-
R19Page 63The Grand Jury has heard testimony that the impact of the new procedures on Fort Bragg and the coastal areas of the County have been mixed. The Fort Bragg area had in place, prior to the closure of the PHF, a system for crisis response that has not changed. The Fort Bragg office of the DMH has employees to respond to crisis calls Monday to Friday 89 a.m. to 5 p.m. The County has a contract with Ford Street Project, a private non-profit human service organization, to provide crisis response during all other times. DMH supervisors are available for telephone consultation with the Ford Street crisis workers. The Ford Street Project also provides three beds for “time-out” cases in the same situations now available at the CSC. The primary change has been for Section 5150 cases, which require a custodial setting. Information from crisis workers on the coast indicates without a PHF, it sometimes takes longer to find a placement for persons who must be detained under Section 5150 because they must be taken out of the county. Response: The City is not informed regarding crisis services on the Coast and as a result can neither agree nor disagree with the Grand Jury’s finding.
-
R20Page 63There are currently three on-call crisis workers who are employed in other human service jobs. They participate in continual training and case conferences and are supervised by on-call DMH personnel. Often the crisis workers have extensive prior knowledge of the client and the needs of the case, thus facilitating decision-making. Response: While we are aware that three on-call crisis workers are available, we are not informed regarding client continuity tracking and therefore are not in a position to either agree or disagree with the finding.
-
R21Page 64Other partners in the process, law enforcement and hospital medical staff, at times, question the qualifications and decisions made by the crisis workers. On the other hand, crisis workers feel that police officers and emergency room staff do not understand the requirements and consequences of a Section 5150 detention nor the difficulty in diagnosing a mental disorder. Response: Agree with finding.
Comments 17
-
CO1 Page 55Inmates need more motivation to study and move on to higher education they should be encourage to be involved in personal improvement activities. 55
-
CO2 Page 56RESPONSE REQUIRED Board of Supervisors Mendocino County Sheriff RESPONSE REQUESTED Jail Commander of Mendocino County Report completion date: 13 June 2003 56
-
CO3 Page 57Racial Profiling in the Willits Unified School District and in the City of Willits Police Department. Reason for the Investigation The Grand Jury received complaints from four families that Willits High School and Willits Police Department were engaged in racial profiling due to concerns about gang activities in Willits. The major complaint was that students, parents and Willits High School staff adopted a dress code. Procedure The Grand Jury interviewed the complainants, the Willits Chief of Police, a captain on the Willits Police force, and the school principals at Willits High School and Baechtel Grove Middle School. The Grand Jury also interviewed the Willits School District Superintendent of Schools. The Grand Jury interviewed two students of Willits High School and their fathers. The Grand Jury attended a news conference promoted by three parents and some of their children. 57
-
CO4 Page 60The Grand Jury commends the Willits Police Department and Willits School Administrators. The Grand Jury urges all parents, who are concerned about any difficulties their children are experiencing in schools, to address these problems and to work cooperatively with the schools.
-
CO5 Page 71The Grand Jury commends the city government and citizenry of Point Arena on its completion and adoption of its General Plan, its efforts to establish its emergency services program, its successful petroleum and solid waste recycling program, its support of the Safe Passages program, and its sound fiscal management. The Grand Jury applauds the dedication of the virtually unpaid elected officials of the city and the dedication of its salaried employees as well. Misinformation and lack of communication between various factions of the citizenry and City government is endemic. The public does not regularly attend City Council meetings. The City Council in the past has had to appoint members because of lack of interest. The Grand Jury would remind the citizenry of Point Arena that “you get the government you deserve.” Supplemental Comments The Grand Jury attended the special joint meeting of the City of Point Arena and the Redwood Coast Fire Protection District on February 19, 2003 in which Point Arena considered the following positive steps to begin resolving the public safety issues in the Arena cove area. (1) The owners of the Wharfmaster’s Inn and Coast Guard House B&B agreed to upgrade their water storage to approximately 20,000 gallons with fire equipment access and hose connection access. 71
-
CO6 Page 72(2) The City of Point Arena and the owners of the aforementioned lodging establishments agreed to improve the secondary vehicle access to the Wharfmaster’s Inn. (3) The City of Point arena agreed to upgrade the main water transmission line supplying the Arena cove area, to assure adequate water pressure and volume. The plans are to be completed by August 19, 2003. (4) The City of Point Arena is to aggressively procure funding to complete the new water line. 72
-
CO7 Page 73MENDOCINO COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION As a part of the Grand Jury’s routine oversight responsibilities as mandated by the California Penal Code, the 2002-2003 Grand Jury selected the Risk Management Division of the County of Mendocino Administrative Office. The primary, but not exclusive, focus of this review was to survey the various insurance and reinsurance programs managed by the Risk Management Office, review related and supporting programs, and look at the adverse impact of budgetary constraints on all areas of operations including staffing. Special emphasis was given to the General Liability Self-Insured Program. The Grand Jury did not review the administration of the Health Insurance Program. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION In accomplishing it’s review of the County Risk Management Division, the Grand Jury interviewed the County Risk Manager, The County Administrator, County Counsel, and selected Risk Management Staff. In addition, the Grand Jury reviewed the February 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self Insured Liability Program, the December 2002 County of Mendocino Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability Program (Forecast for Policy Year 2003-2004), the most recent Liability Claim Audit of July 8, 2000, the most recent Budget Narrative, the March 2002 Workers’ 73
-
CO8 Page 74Compensation Claims Audit, the Return to Work Program, Policy Notebook, Property Schedule/Valuations Notebook, (CSAC) Insurance Program Notebook, CSAC Broker Activity Report, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Book, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority Executive Committee Tentative Agenda Book, The Mendocino County Safety Manual, The 2002-2003 Division Budget, and applicable Mendocino County Ordinances. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Risk Management Division is currently staffed with 6 persons including, the Risk Manager, one part time and one full time Safety Officers, a Return to Work Coordinator, a Safety Coordinator, and, a Benefit Specialist. Two positions remain vacant due to lack of funding. They are the Risk Management Analyst and the Staff Assistant I. The Risk Manager is appointed by the County Administrator, and reports to the County Administrator through an assigned liaison staff member at the County Administrators Office. The “Mission Statement” outlines the general functions of this division in saying, “The Risk Management Division of the County of Mendocino Administrative Office shall identify and measure all risks (uncertainty of loss) of the County of Mendocino by developing and implementing appropriate techniques for assessing and resolving these exposures via risk assumption, risk reduction, risk retention, risk transfer or the purchase of insurance”.
-
CO9 Page 82The positive results of an effective Risk Management program can be often directly measured by cost savings directly attributable to specific programs designed to reduce risk and loss costs. All too often, however, the cost savings are difficult to measure, especially when large (expensive) and unusual adverse events simply do not take place because of the efforts of the Risk Management Division Staff. While it could be appropriate claims management, or the prevention of a large and unusual loss, the County Supervisors should view their investment in risk management activities as essential to the financial protection of the residents and taxpayers of Mendocino County. Additionally, the Grand Jury wishes to acknowledge the tremendous professionalism and commitment of the Risk Manager and her staff. Given budget constraints and a resultant staffing shortage, they function at an extremely high 82
-
CO10 Page 83level given generally staggering workloads. The County can not realistically expect this to continue indefinitely, and must eventually make decisions regarding just what services they will require from the Risk Management Division, and how they will pay for those services. The Risk Manager is a tremendous asset to the County. RESPONSE REQUIRED Mendocino County Administrator Mendocino County Counsel Mendocino County Supervisors 83
-
CO11 Page 84THE MENDOCINO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION As a part of the Grand Jury’s oversight responsibilities, as mandated by the California Penal Code, the 2002-2003 Grand Jury selected the Mendocino County Employees Retirement Association, (MCERA or “the association”), for a review of operations, cost structure, and asset development, including the large unfunded actuarial accrued liability, (UAAL). METHODS OF INVESTIGATION In accomplishing its review of the County Retirement Association, the Grand Jury interviewed the County Treasurer, the Association’s Certified Public Accountant, the Association’s actuarial firm in San Francisco, and independent investment advisors, and, also attended County Board of Supervisors and County Retirement Board meetings. In addition, the Grand Jury reviewed the 3 most recent actuarial reports, the Financial Statements for the last 3 years, the County of Mendocino Audit Report of June 30, 2001, the Association’s By Laws, the County Treasurer’s Financial and Statistical reports, the “Mission Statement and Departmental Functions” for the Treasurer-Tax Collector, the planned 2002-2003 County Budget for the administration of the retirement system, Resolution No. 1999/2000-2 of the Mendocino County Employees Retirement Association Board of Retirement Establishing Investment Policies, MCERA Performance Measurement Report for the Period Ending 6/30/02, the prospectus for the 1996 County of Mendocino 84
-
CO12 Page 85Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds and the related “Funding Agreement” between the County of Mendocino and the Mendocino County Employees Retirement Association, Minutes from the Association Board meetings for the last several years, the California Constitution, applicable state government codes, and the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, as amended. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Employees Retirement Association was formed in 1948 and operates pursuant to the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, and, as subsequently amended. This law provides the option for Counties to establish and manage their own “defined benefit pension plan”. Such plans, including the Mendocino County Employees Retirement Association, are totally controlled and operated by a “Retirement Board”. MCERA’s board consists of nine members, four are appointed by the County Board of Supervisors, two are elected by general county employees, one is elected by county retirees, one is elected by county safety employees, and one is the County Treasurer, (ex-officio), and who is also the administrator of the retirement system. All functions must also be conducted in accordance with California State Constitution, California Government Codes, and other governing policies such as the Association’s “By Laws”. Article 16 § 17(a) of the California Constitution clearly articulates the responsibilities of the Retirement Board by stating: “The retirement board of a public pension or retirement system shall have the sole and exclusive fiduciary responsibility over the assets of the public pension or retirement system. The retirement board shall also have sole and exclusive responsibility to administer the system in a manner that will assure prompt delivery of benefits and related services 85
-
CO13 Page 86to the participants and their beneficiaries. The assets of a public pension or retirement system are trust funds and shall be held for the exclusive purposes of providing benefits to participants in the pension or retirement system and their beneficiaries and defraying reasonable expenses of administering the system”. Under Article 16 § 17(b) the Constitution goes on to say that, “A retirement board’s duty to its participants and their beneficiaries shall take precedence over any other duty”. In accordance with Section 31584 of the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, the County Board of Supervisors is obligated to make payments to the Retirement Association for amounts arising as a result of retirement benefits accruing to members of the Association. MCERA is a “cost sharing multiple employer plan” that includes not only employees of the County of Mendocino, but also the Cemetery District of the Redwoods, and the Russian River Cemetery District. As of June 30, 2001, there were 2,450 total active plan members. Of this number, 683 are retirees and beneficiaries receiving benefits, 316 are plan members entitled to receive benefits but who are not yet doing so, and 1,451 are active (working) plan members. It is beyond the scope and time available to this Grand Jury to analyze all the administration and investment expenses, both soft and hard, incurred in maintaining an independent retirement system, and compare the overall performance to other alternatives such as CALPERS with a concomitant comparison of asset performance and service to retirees and beneficiaries. 86
-
CO14 Page 94By continuing to carry an ongoing and increasing UAAL, the Board of Supervisors, whether intentional or not, is effectively subsidizing the County’s fiscal budget with monies that should have been allocated each year to adequately fund the Retirement Association. 94
-
CO15 Page 95Additionally, it would seem that while another Pension Obligation Bond would solve the Board of Supervisors funding problem in the near term, it is only a band-aid that does not address all the forces that are driving the UAAL ever higher. It should also be noted that in so doing, the County Board of Supervisors would, again, be shifting the financial burden for past (retirement fund) liabilities to future generations of taxpayers with no guarantee that accrued future benefits would be funded on a “pay as you go”, or incurred basis. While this kind of financial “logic” is common practice at the Federal level, the Grand Jury feels that the notion of constantly pushing the payment of past obligations, (accrued benefits), into the future is a financial philosophy that is not sound for the plan participants or the Mendocino County taxpayers. Special Note: The Grand Jury wishes to acknowledge the current actions of the Pension Administrator, the Pension Board, the County Board of Supervisors and many others in defining and working toward resolving the difficult and complex problem of Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability. This “work in progress” is not only taking place as this report is being written, but will, of necessity, require continuing attention on an annual basis. Additionally, it is probable that by the time this report is published, there may be significant changes in the status of the problems identified and potential solutions. 95
-
CO16 Page 96RESPONSE REQUIRED Mendocino County Board of Supervisors Mendocino County Employees Retirement Association Board Mendocino County Counsel RESPONSE REQUESTED Association Investment Advisor Association Actuarial Firm 96
-
CO17 Page 97Mendocino County Juvenile Hall The Mendocino County Juvenile Hall (MCJH), under the direction of the Probation Department, provides for the physical and emotional care of incarcerated youth in Mendocino County. The Grand Jury reviewed the recent changes involving youth classified as Code I (maximum security), Code II (medium security), and Code III (committed a violent crime). Method of investigation The Grand Jury (GJ) interviewed the Superintendent, several staff members (male and female), made a complete tour of the facilities and reviewed the California Code of Regulations: Minimum Standards for Juveniles Facilities Title 15, Section 1313, 1371 and 1488, Building Standard Title 14.