📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Madera County Grand Jury • 2024-2025

Madera County Strategic Plan – Mission 2023

Published: June 19, 2024 68 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 16 findings

F1 Page 222
The current Strategic Plan - Mission 2023 has expired.
F2 Page 222
The Madera County BOS did not have a plan for moving forward once the Strategic Plan expired.
F3 Page 222
Individual Focus Areas identified on BOS Agenda Packet Agenda Item Submittal forms are often grouped together or completely omitted with no explanation or rationale Provided.
F4 Page 222
In reviewing Agenda Packets, no agenda item was found that made reference to an annual Report Card, which would provide an update on the status of the Plan and, provide the public with information, and increase transparency.
F5 Page 222
Madera County and the City of Madera officials are in conflict regarding Government relations.
F6 Page 222
The current Strategic Plan - Mission 2023 did not take into consideration goals for the future.
F7 Page 231
The MCGJ finds that the logos and name Madera Municipal Golf Course are often omitted from signage, scorecards, announcements, menus, events, websites, etc.
F8 Page 231
The MCGJ finds that the golf course kitchen and bar have not been operated by Sugar Pine Smokehouse. 230
F9 Page 232
The MCGJ finds that the City made the written statement that no applications or City business licenses exist for GROUP.
F10 Page 232
The MCGJ finds that the use of CI money has been discussed by the City and SGM as being used for deferred maintenance at the MMGC.
F11 Page 232
The MCGJ finds that the City Tax Collector has no system to track businesses within the City to ensure that the City is receiving prompt and continuous tax payments.
F12 Page 232
The MCGJ finds that the City of Madera has had discussions about writing one coherent consolidated MMGC Lease with SGM.
F13 Page 232
The MCGJ finds that the City has repeatedly failed to ascertain or confirm the true identity of SGM’s purported subtenant(s) at the MMGC.
F14 Page 232
The MCGJ finds that SGM appears to have two subtenants: Smokehouse for the food service, and the undisclosed bar operator GROUP.
F15 Page 232
The MCGJ finds that the Interim Fire Marshal recommended that the MMGC be brought up to both the ADA requirements and the City Building Code due to serious violations.
F16 Page 232
The MCGJ finds that the City has failed to ensure that its tenant and subtenants at the MMGC have performed their daily maintenance obligations under the Lease

Recommendations 16