Santa Cruz County Grand Jury • 2009-2010

Who is Watching Our Special Districts?

Published: June 25, 2009 6 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 9 findings

F1
Each county LAFCO operates independently and may adopt local policies. [LAFCO 101]
F2
LAFCO, through Municipal Service and Sphere-of-Influence reviews, may hold special districts accountable for meeting community service needs, including governmental structure and operational efficiencies. [Government Code 56439(a)(5)]
F3
From the inception of special districts, they were required to operate by “rules,” often redefined as bylaws or rules of proceedings as in (Kehoe) Government Code 61045(f).
F4
All special districts fall under the mandate of the Ralph M. Brown Act, adopted in 1953 [Government Code 54950 to 54962], which requires agencies to have open meetings.
F5
In Santa Cruz County the special district that initiated this investigation has operated, and others may continue to operate, in violation of statutes requiring adoption of bylaws and parliamentary procedures.
F6
Santa Cruz County special districts have never been required to submit bylaws, parliamentary procedures and mission statements to LAFCO.
F7
LAFCO special district files in Santa Cruz County contain very few, if any, copies of bylaws, parliamentary procedures or mission statements.
F8
In Santa Cruz County no governmental agency has provided special district oversight to ensure existence of and operation within bylaws and parliamentary procedures.
F9
Among the 78 special districts within Santa Cruz county that are the subject of this report, all are authorized to operate under various principal acts and California statutes. Conclusions

Recommendations 6