San Luis Obispo County Grand Jury • 2012-2013

An Event Is An Event—An Impact Is An Impact San Luis Obispo County Proposed Events Ordinance Amendment 2012/2013 San*

Published: June 06, 2013 32 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 13 findings

F1
The existing temporary events ordinance is outdated (1980). The Planning Department is operating and making decisions based on decades-old guidelines that have not kept pace with the changing realities and technologies of commercial (for-profit) and non-profit outdoor events.
F2
The current permit process needs to be streamlined.
F3
The Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors have received input from public groups, individuals, industry groups and special interest groups about the Events Ordinance Amendments over the last eight years.
F4
All events have the potential of adversely impacting the community and environment.
F5
Events are presently not equitably regulated. There are three types of events, (1) permitted (2) exempted or (3) those events where sponsors fail to apply for a permit.
F6
Code enforcement pertains only to permitted events. Events that are exempt from the permit process or where sponsors fail to apply for a permit are not subject to code enforcement.
F7
There can be no code enforcement without specific event guidelines defined in the ordinance.
F8
On the Planning Department's website, the "Questions and Complaints" link fails to specify how the complaint will be handled, i.e., the response time and subsequent follow up contact information.
F9
The Planning Department does not maintain a log of all code enforcement complaints received nor how and when they were resolved along with a description of actions taken.
F10
The Planning Department does not have a policy as to how long it takes to initially respond to a complaint.
F11
During the day of permitted events, several County and State agencies, i.e., Public Works, Health Department and CAL FIRE, make on-site inspections. Event sponsors who do not go through the permit process (exempted events and those who fail to apply for a permit) have no required on-site safety inspections.
F12
In the absence of specific guidelines, some event sponsors have taken on the responsibility to mitigate public concerns and public safety as a priority in their event planning.
F13
Not all regulations can be applied equally to all venues.

Recommendations 5

Conclusions 1

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.