📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Mendocino County Grand Jury • 2000-2001

Grand Jury Reports

Published: October 03, 2000 48 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 5 findings

F1 Page 155
A review of current “Policy and Procedures Letters” and “Child Welfare Services Information Bulletins” show that Social Services wrote letters and bulletins regarding policies the Grand Jury identified as lacking. Response (Social Services): The Department agrees with this finding. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board agrees with this finding.
F2 Page 155
In Social Service notebooks, finding procedures for specific topics is cumbersome. Social Services has placed letters and bulletins chronologically in notebooks with section tabs for years 1995-2000 and “Currently under revision” in the back. Each notebook has a key-word index, but Social Services staff indicated that a subject-based policy and procedures manual would be an asset to social workers. 2000-2001 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report 142 Response (Social Services): The Department agrees with this finding. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board agrees with this finding.
F3 Page 156
On November 7, 2000, the Grand Jury asked for copies of the Foster Parent Handbook and Health and Education Passport by December 1, 2000. a. Social Services furnished a copy of the Foster Parent Handbook developed in Spring 1999, updated for November 29, 2000. Each page has date of revision noted. b. Social Services furnished a copy of Health & Education Passport notebook with instructions dated November 2, 2000. Social Services reports the notebooks are in use. There is no corroborating evidence to support this.
F4 Page 159
In a letter dated February 22, 2001, the Department of Planning and Building stated that the Planning and Building “will schedule this issue for discussion and direction by the Board of Supervisors with 90 days.” As of May 23, 2001, (the end of the 90 days) the issue had been scheduled for the June 6, 2001 Board of Supervisors meeting. Response (Planning and Building): The Department agrees with this finding with a minor clarification. The item was officially scheduled for, and heard by, the Board of Supervisors on June 12, 2001. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board agrees with this finding with the date of correction noted by the Department.
F5 Page 159
Large businesses consider the current penalties no more than cost of doing business. Response (Planning and Building): Without additional information, we can neither agree nor disagree. While the Department previously agreed with this statement the Department no longer sees wholesale avoidance of the permit process. We believe this to be due to changes in the business and permit processing “climate”. 2000-2001 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report 146 Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board agrees with the departmental response. The Board believes the development of the streamlined permitting process has been a contributing factor in positive change towards business perception of a “user friendly” department and process.

Recommendations 16