⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Recommendations 1
-
R3Public Health Dept. Health Care Agency (R-1,R-3,R-4,R-5) ND 10/5/00 9/29/00 Α Public Health Dept. (R1 thru R-5) 10/5/00 ND 9/29/00 Α 7/5/00 Environmental Health: Food Protection 153 HEW Resrce MgmtAgency, Envir Health Div.(R-1,R-2) 10/5/00 ND 9/29/00 Α 6/13/00 159 Inpatient Indigent Care in Ventura County HEW Board of Supervisors (R-1,R-2) 8/13/00 9/29/00 ND 47 Α Chief Administrative Officer (R-1,R-2) 8/13/00 ND 9/29/00 47 Α 6/22/00 Camarillo Health Care District 165 HEW 9/22/00 12-Sep Camarillo Health Care District (R-1 thru R-7) 15-Sep Α 9/22/00 ND 9/29/00 7 V.C. County Health Care Agency (R-2,R-6) Α LAFCO (R-1,R-2,R-3,R-7) 7/19/00 8/1/00 9/22/00 Α 7/5/00 V.C. Juvenile Court Schools 177 HEW Principal, Juvenile Court Schools (R-2) 9/5/00 8/2/00 7/26/00 Α Director, V.C. Probation Dept. (R-1,R-2) 9/5/00 7/27/00 9/29/00 24 Α 7/5/00 V.C. Juvenile Justice Facilities Plan 185 Law & J Director, Probation Dept (R-2) 9/5/00 7/27/00 9/29/00 24 Α Chief Administration Officer (R-1) 9/5/00 ND 9/29/00 24 Α 7/5/00 Assessmnt of Fees:Work Furlough Inmates 191 Law & J Chief Administrative Officer (R-4) 9/5/00 ND 9/29/00 24 Α Dir./Chief Probation Officer (R-1,R-2,R-3) 9/5/00 7/27/00 9/29/00 Α 24 Protocol Visits 7/5/00 207 V.C.Probation Dept.(R-1) NR 10/5/00 Board of Supervisors (R-2) 9/5/00 NR Sheriff Dept. (R-2) 9/5/00 NR Figure 1. Responses to 1998-1999 Grand Jury Report (continued) Final Report Final Report 2000 - 2001 Ventura County Grand Jury
Conclusions 1
-
CL1Considering the number and breadth of reports issued, the record of responses, while allowing room for improvement, is not altogether unreasonable. Approximately two-thirds of the agencies responded in a timely manner. If responses received by the Grand Jury prior to the deadline but not received by the Presiding Judge until after the deadline are included, the percentage of timely responses rises accordingly. A considerable number of responses from county departments were compiled by the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) and forwarded together under one transmittal letter. This resulted in some confusion both to the respective departments and the grand jury Review Committee tracking the responses. Final Report 2000 - 2001 Ventura County Grand Jury That committee sent 13 non-response letters to County departments that had already forwarded their response, within the allotted timeframe, to the CAO's office as per that office's instructions to do so. The fact that these department's responses and the responses of 14 other County departments were required to funnel through the CAO's office to be reviewed and compiled, caused these responses to be from 7 to 78 days late depending on the respective department's required timeframe in which to respond as stated in the Penal Code, section 933(c). In short, 27 of the 29 reports received by the Grand Jury that were beyond the required due date were included in the CAO's response package under one cover letter that was date stamped as received by the Presiding Judge on Sept. 29th 2000. All responses were reviewed by the 2000-2001 Grand Jury, and in four cases, a further response or follow up visit was required in order to determine the degree of compliance to the respective department's acceptance of Grand Jury recommendations.