📋

Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Placer County Grand Jury • 2014-2015

Placer County Grand Jury 2014-2015 Final Report detriment to their physical or mental health, an interference with

Published: June 26, 2015 10 pages

View PDF View Full Original

⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings 4 findings

F1 Page 98

During interviews, school district personnel indicated that they either have implemented, or are implementing, mechanisms for the safe reporting of bullying and cyber-bullying.

F2 Page 98

Some schools do not have a means for anonymous reporting.

F3 Page 98

Schools are measuring the effectiveness of the programs, but with a few exceptions, do not yet have enough data to draw statistically valid conclusions.

F4 Page 98

Schools are utilizing PBIS to collect behavior data that includes bullying incidents.

Recommendations 4

R1
Page 98

Schools should continue to develop and refine mechanisms for the safe reporting of bullying and cyber-bullying.
R2
Page 98

Schools with no provisions for the anonymous reporting of bullying should create them. As part of their response, all schools are to provide a copy of their anonymous bullying reporting policy.
R3
Page 98

Schools should continue to measure the effectiveness of their anti-bullying policies and utilize that data to improve school climate, including creating a safe environment for all.
R4
Page 98

Schools utilizing PBIS should continue its use and foster its expansion to other schools as training is available. - 94 - -2015 Final Report