📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Placer County Grand Jury
• 2014-2015
Placer County Grand Jury 2014-2015 Final Report detriment to their physical or mental health, an interference with
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 4 findings
F1
Page 98
During interviews, school district personnel indicated that they either have implemented, or are implementing, mechanisms for the safe reporting of bullying and cyber-bullying.
F2
Page 98
Some schools do not have a means for anonymous reporting.
F3
Page 98
Schools are measuring the effectiveness of the programs, but with a few exceptions, do not yet have enough data to draw statistically valid conclusions.
F4
Page 98
Schools are utilizing PBIS to collect behavior data that includes bullying incidents.
Recommendations 4
-
R1Page 98Schools should continue to develop and refine mechanisms for the safe reporting of bullying and cyber-bullying.
-
R2Page 98Schools with no provisions for the anonymous reporting of bullying should create them. As part of their response, all schools are to provide a copy of their anonymous bullying reporting policy.
-
R3Page 98Schools should continue to measure the effectiveness of their anti-bullying policies and utilize that data to improve school climate, including creating a safe environment for all.
-
R4Page 98Schools utilizing PBIS should continue its use and foster its expansion to other schools as training is available. - 94 - -2015 Final Report