Tuolumne County Grand Jury • 2009-2010

Sonora Union High School

Published: November 18, 2009 3 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings 9 findings

F1
SUHS representatives did not respond to jury member’s requests for documents even though these documents should be readily available to the public.
F2
The SUHS cafeteria has no unprocessed or whole grain food products available. It serves no whole wheat breads, pastas or brown rice. The food available has only highly processed starches. While the cafeteria meets minimum state nutritional requirements, the food being served does not enhance overall student health.
F3
The SUHS campus was unkempt and messy. Paper and other trash were along the fence lines, by the outdoor tables, and in what plantings were present. Weeds were growing through cracks in the paved areas and in the plantings.
F4
The SUHS security staff looked unprofessional and showed little apparent concern for student safety. Panel members were not required to sign in or out at the office for the meetings. No juror was asked for identification. At no time did security approach and ask why the members were on site, even after the meetings when some panel members had to leave the group and walked across campus on their own. Other panel members went to different points on the campus and were not challenged. (After asking about this, panel members were informed the security personnel had been told the Grand Jury would be on site.)
F5
Jurors requested, but did not receive, a copy of the security protocols.
F6
Certificated Staff members were quick to blame parents and students for any academic shortcomings. Blame was also placed on lack of money and the ‘limitations of rural students’.
F7
Proposals to cut the present 240 credits required for graduation to 220 credits due to no summer school program have been made
F8
There is a dress code for students, but little enforcement was apparent.
F9
Just over two percent (2%) of the SUHS students are enrolled in Advanced Placement (AP) courses.

Recommendations 10