Trinity County Grand Jury • 2005-2006

2005-2006 Trinity County Grand Jury Report*

Published: June 06, 2006 5 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings and Recommendations 1 findings

F1
Several questions were received by this jury regarding the procedures used by law enforcement when speaking with a student at Trinity High School. There appears to be confusion over the proper procedures, on the part of the students, the parents, and the general public.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
It is recommended that a member of the Probation Department speak annually at the Student Orientation sessions held at public, continuation and alternative schools so that the students understand their rights relating to the Probation Department. It should be explained how the department can approach the students and under what conditions. It should also be explained what are illegal and inappropriate behaviors. Much of this could be accomplished in the form of a brochure outlining this information to be included in the parent packet provided at the beginning of the school year. CONCLUSION: In light of the Budget restraints, Chief Probation Officer Terry Lee and his staff are to be commended on the care and compassion they give to the young people in their care. The clean, well managed facility they maintain is one the entire county can be proud of. RESPONSES REQUIRED: Recommendation Respond in

Conclusions 1

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Trinity County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office
Trinity County County Superintendent of Schools Elected County Office

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.