📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 2 findings
F4
Page 17
The Annual Property Tax Bill and the Supplemental Property Tax Bill do not explain that cents are truncated and do not explain the rounding adjustment. Although these practices are consistent with legal requirements imposed by the Revenue and Taxation Code, the current information provided to taxpayers lacks transparency for how tax dollars are being calculated.
F5
Page 17
DTAC collects customer feedback via an online survey available only in English that addresses website interaction but gives little opportunity for customer input regarding other concerns. There is limited effort to gather input from the public about how best to improve the overall taxpayer experience using alternative methods.
Recommendations 2
-
R4Page 17DTAC should provide the taxpayer with an explanation for the truncation and rounding adjustment. This should be implemented in the next annual property tax bill.
-
R5Page 17The County should create a way to capture concerns from taxpayers in multiple languages, independent of an online communication channel, such as surveys included with the paper property tax bill, focus groups, and advisory boards. This should be implemented by June 30, 2022. PROPERTY TAX BILLS: MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE PROPERTY TAX BILLS: MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE