📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Alameda County Grand Jury • 2021-2022

Oakland Fails to Enforce Financial Disclosure Rules to Protect the Public

14 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 6 findings

F9 Page 44
The Oakland City Clerk’s office is not meeting the minimum requirements of the Filing Officer under the Political Reform Act. The issues of non-compliance with the rules regarding Form 700s are long-standing and structural, resulting from inadequate funding, an inefficient system of communication of critical information to the Filing Officer, and limited staffing.
F10 Page 44
A transfer of the Form 700 filing duties from the Oakland City Clerk’s office to the Public Ethics Commission would require hiring an additional employee; an amendment of the City Ethics Act to identify the Public Ethics Commission as the Filing Officer for Form 700s; and the transfer of the function and payment of the City’s contract with the online filing provider, NetFile, from the City Clerk’s office to the Public Ethics Commission.
F11 Page 44
Grant funding has been used to fund staffing to support critical services in the City of Oakland. 44 2021-2022 Alameda County Civil Grand Jury Final Report _______________________________________________________________________________________
F12 Page 45
The city of Oakland’s shared electronic Human Resources platform is not used in the Form 700 process but could be customized to assist in the sharing of information between departments.
F13 Page 45
The city of Oakland’s new employee checklist does not include Form 700 filing requirements to the employee.
F14 Page 45
The Grand Jury commends the hard work of those individuals within the Oakland City Clerk’s office who are responsible for the Form 700 process. The problems with the Form 700 process are the result of structural limitations, limited staffing, and inadequate interdepartmental communication.

Recommendations 5