📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Santa Cruz County Grand Jury • 2002-2003

Substance Abuse in Santa Cruz County High Schools: Consequences and Responsibility

View PDF View Full Original

Findings and Recommendations 28 findings

F1 Page 11
Studies show that a majority of high school students are either currently using alcohol and/or drugs, or have used these substances in the past. Even as early as 7th grade, 52% of these youngsters have been or currently are using drugs or alcohol. The data cited are from the “Healthy Kids Survey of Santa Cruz County,” a study conducted by the County’s school districts, and include alternative schools, The Ark, Loma Prieta and Renaissance High Schools, but not the County Office of Education Alternative Education schools. The data represent lifetime use. Page 1-4 Substance Abuse in Santa Cruz County High Schools Consequences and Responsibility 2001–2002 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Report Santa Cruz County Youth Survey, 2001 Grade 7 Grade 9 Grade 11 Substance Used Santa Santa Santa Calif. Calif. Calif. Cruz Cruz Cruz Alcohol 29% 25% 57% 50% 73% 70% Been Drunk 11% 10% 33% 24% 53% 45% Inhalants 12% 6% 15% 8% 16% 14% Marijuana 11% 8% 32% 24% 50% 45% Cocaine 7% 4% 9% 9% Methamphetamines 7% 4% 8% 9% Hallucinogens 7% 6% 10% 12% Heroin 4% 2% 4% 3%
No recommendations for this finding
F2 Page 11
Heroin use has shown a frightening rise among students at the 9th grade level. By 11th grade, another 4% of students are new heroin users. The 4% of the student population who are heroin users in 9th grade do not stay in regular public schools. By the 11th grade, these students have either dropped out of school, are in alternative schools, are in drug treatment programs or juvenile detention, or are deceased. This represents approximately 8% of the total high school student population who use heroin.
No recommendations for this finding
F3 Page 11
The Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program is offered to students from 5th grade through 9th grade. At the time of this report, no such program exists for high school students above the 9th grade.
No recommendations for this finding
F4 Page 11
Santa Cruz County public high school students receive substance abuse education in a one-semester health class. Substance abuse is only one of many topics covered in this class.
No recommendations for this finding
F5 Page 11
School officials and law enforcement officers both report that public and parental apathy contribute to a lack of meaningful consequences for substance abuse and juvenile crime incidents. Surveys show Santa Cruz County leads the state in support of medical and recreational marijuana use. Some parents shrug off what they consider to be “minor” drug incidents.
No recommendations for this finding
F6 Page 12
Due to the rise in school violence, a full time SRO is assigned to each high school campus. These peace officers have to deal with every type of criminal behavior including vandalism, substance abuse, physical violence and weapons on campus. The SRO is ultimately responsible for the physical safety of students and faculty.
No recommendations for this finding
F7 Page 12
Aptos High School and Scotts Valley High School are the only public high schools with closed campuses. A closed campus restricts students from leaving school grounds during school hours.
No recommendations for this finding
F8 Page 12
Five of the county’s public high schools have open campuses which allow students to leave and return during the school day.
No recommendations for this finding
F9 Page 12
An open campus policy presents the opportunity for some students to leave the school grounds to use, buy or sell drugs or alcohol. Substance Abuse in Santa Cruz County High Schools Page 1-5 Consequences and Responsibility 2001–2002 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
No recommendations for this finding
F10 Page 12
School officials report 50 to 100 on-campus drug incidents per school year in each of the county’s seven public high schools. The majority of these incidents involve possession of marijuana on campus.
No recommendations for this finding
F11 Page 12
On or off campus, when apprehended by law enforcement officers for substance abuse, a student is detained, the drugs or alcohol are confiscated, and a report is forwarded to the Juvenile Probation Division for follow-up.
No recommendations for this finding
F12 Page 12
A youth apprehended for selling drugs on campus is put under arrest and removed from the school campus. The youth is taken to Juvenile Hall for processing, and may or may not be held in custody depending on the risk assessment performed at Juvenile Hall. (See the second section of this report for further details on risk assessment.)
No recommendations for this finding
F13 Page 13
A first time drug offense usually results in a three-day suspension by the school district, mandatory community service, or some other supervised activity.
No recommendations for this finding
F14 Page 13
Drug testing is not a prerequisite for returning to campus.
No recommendations for this finding
F15 Page 13
It can take up to three months from the time of an incident until a probation officer meets with the juvenile and his or her parents.
No recommendations for this finding
F16 Page 13
The SRO can request information from the Juvenile Probation Division regarding specific individuals. The SRO is not provided with a list of students at their schools who are on probation, and is not informed of the disposition of pending cases.
No recommendations for this finding
F17 Page 13
Many programs that provide care or counseling for youths involved with substance abuse or with the juvenile justice system exist throughout the county. However, a consolidated referral list of these programs has not been developed.
No recommendations for this finding
F18 Page 13
Except at Soquel High School, teen centers or other supervised gathering points for teens do not exist on school grounds at this time.
No recommendations for this finding
F19 Page 13
Several agencies provide counseling on campus for a variety of different problems. (See report on Review of Initial Alcohol and Drug Intervention with High School Age Youth.) Conclusions
No recommendations for this finding
F20 Page 13
Reports and citations are referred to the Juvenile Probation Division for review and/or actions. Investigations are conducted and include meetings with the parents and the juvenile. Some cases are forwarded to Juvenile Court.
No recommendations for this finding
F21 Page 13
The delay between the time of arrest and initial contact with a probation officer is typically two to three months.
No recommendations for this finding
F22 Page 13
The Juvenile Probation Division interacts with the several law enforcement agencies conducting “Juvenile Diversion Programs.”
No recommendations for this finding
F23 Page 13
The Sheriff’s Department has no diversion programs in unincorporated areas policed by that agency. (See report on Review of Initial Alcohol and Drug Intervention with High School Age Youth.) Page 1-12 Substance Abuse in Santa Cruz County High Schools Consequences and Responsibility 2001–2002 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Report
No recommendations for this finding
F24 Page 14
The Juvenile Probation Division reports that law enforcement officers can access any of the division’s information but that it does not routinely provide the information to officers.
No recommendations for this finding
F25 Page 14
The average length of stay in Juvenile Hall has been reduced. In 1999 the average length of stay was 32 days. At the close of fieldwork, the average length of stay was 8.9 days.
No recommendations for this finding
F26 Page 14
Some parents have reported the Juvenile Probation Division has a very lax attitude toward marijuana use. Some parents stated they were told by the Juvenile Probation Division, “At least it’s better than cocaine or methamphetamines.”
No recommendations for this finding
F27 Page 14
The County judicial system is evaluating juvenile detention reform.
No recommendations for this finding
F28 Page 14
The Watsonville Police Department has been instrumental in initiating dialogue between the Juvenile Probation Division and other law enforcement agencies. Conclusions
No recommendations for this finding