Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
Environmental Concerns Committee
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F10, F13, F14, F18, F19, F20, F21, F22, F29, F39, F50, F54, F55, F56, F57, F58, F61, F62, F63
Findings 58 findings
Recommendations 61
-
R1adopt a comprehensive statement of policies which govern the program for Proposition A contracting. This statement should be formally amended when 11 necessary and kept up-to-date at all times. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office
-
R2exercise substantially more responsibility and be held accountable for the 11 direction and coordination of the "contracting out" program...... The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office
-
R3provide to the various department up-to-date written procedures for the "contracting out" process and technical assistance on the various aspects of 11 the program as needed...... The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office
-
R4undertake a comprehensive reappraisal of existing Proposition A procedures 12 to determine whether existing review steps are still necessary and useful..... 10.00 The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office
-
R5establish time frames for the review and approval of departmental requests to solicit proposals and award contracts. The Chief Administrative Office should monitor the movement of requests through the process to identify roadblocks 12 and eliminate unnecessary delays................. Andrew Sidesings The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office, with
-
R6assistance from the Auditor-Controller, issue an updated, comprehensive set 12 of guidelines for conducting cost comparison analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
R7The Grand Jury recommends that the Auditor-Controller be assigned responsibility for central review of all cost comparison analyses to assure that 12 guidelines are followed consistently by all departments............ The Grand Jury recommends that following the reappraisal of existing
-
R8K. Proposition A contracting procedures, the Chief Administrative Office develop a manual which sets forth all current policies, procedures and guidelines, including cost comparison guidelines. The manual should be issued to all department heads and other appropriate county personnel, then periodically updated as a one-source document on developing Proposition A contracts. . . . 12 89 Spiriting pa Page The Grand Jury recommends that the county's publicly reported claims
-
R9of dollar savings from Proposition A contracting be corrected and clarified. Among the factors to be considered are that savings data are projections, not actual savings; and that expenses such as monitoring, retraining, and feasibility study costs have not always been included in the calculations because of 13 inconsistent cost comparison practices.................................... The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors encourage the implementation of Proposition A contracting so that it encompasses a broader range of job classifications. (This Recommendation was added by the 13 Audit Committee after publication of the McManis report.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
R11The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors establish a program, including possible set-asides, to encourage minority contractors to 14 bid on Proposition A contracts......
-
R12The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office encourage and experiment with various contracting competition models. Such models should aid in monitoring and evaluating contractor performance, challenge the productivity of county employees providing the same services, 14 and guard against contractor dependency.................................... The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office, with assistance from County Counsel, establish uniform contracting procedures and contractual language for all departments participating in the Proposition A 14 program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that the county enact a lobbyist regis-
-
R15The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors ensure that the Chief Administrative Office has their full support in enforcing compliance with conflict of interest regulations in all contracting activities. Vigorous action in this area will help bolster public confidence in the contracting 15 program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
R16The Grand Jury recommends that the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors add substantially to monies budgeted for essential protective services for abused and neglected children..... 20 90 Page
-
R17The Grand Jury recommends that audit reports conducted by the Auditor-Controller go through the same Board process as do the audits from MSD. They should be presented to the entire Board of Supervisors at a public session as agency items and the audited department should report back to the Board as to the action it plans to take relative to the recom- 23 mendations..... The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors formally establish an audit committee whose responsibility shall be to review all audits and related reports issued by the Management Services Division, the Auditor- Controller, and the Grand Jury; monitor the responses and implementation actions of the audited departments; mediate differences of opinions between 23 the audit agency and the auditee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that the county alter its budgeting policy and allocate to the Management Services Division and the Auditor-Controller each year the funds necessary to conduct all approved management (and other) audits. Provisions should be made for the reimbursement of audit costs 24 from other funding sources, e.g., federal or state, where appropriate...... The Grand Jury recommends that the Management Services Division of the Chief Administrative Office take responsibility to maintain a library of audit reports and disseminate audit information among the various depart- 24 ments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that Los Angeles County provide free preliminary diagnoses of illnesses. A plan for payment could be made when
-
R23The Grand Jury recommends that the medical records abstract system in Šå 29 the hospitals be under computer capability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
R24The Grand Jury recommends that health facility administrators give closer attention to the staff's need for information regarding anticipated 29 changes.................................... Page
-
R25The Grand Jury recommends that funding be identified for cost effective, long-range planning programs to include preventive health care. It is projected by futurists that the Los Angeles County area will be the most populous in the United States around the year 2000. Geriatric needs must be met as well as other health care phenomena which must be included in projected 29 planning.....
-
R26The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the support program presented by the County Solid Waste Management Committee and immediately allocate funds to insure its execution. . . . . . . . 32
-
R27The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors direct the CoSWMP Committee's support program to address the issue of coordinating efforts for the siting and permitting of landfills...... 32
-
R28The Grand Jury recommends that the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office and all law enforcement agencies within the County make complaint forms available to the public at accessible locations in city halls and public libraries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that law enforcement agencies' internal investigations units report directly to the Chief Executive in order to insure optimum monitoring. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
-
R30The Grand Jury recommends to the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office and all law enforcement agencies within the county that allegations of misconduct by police officers be investigated by personnel other than the officers' immediate superiors in order to insure optimum objectivity...... 37
-
R31The Grand Jury recommends that all law enforcement agencies within the county provide psychological counseling services to all officers involved in the use of force and/or firearms resulting in death or serious injury...... 37
-
R32THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE COUNTY CONTINUE TO SEEK REFORM OF STATE WORKERS' COMPENSATION LEGISLATION IN ORDER TO COMBAT RISING COSTS AND TO HELP IDENTIFY AND ELIMINATE LOOPHOLES THAT COULD PERMIT ABUSES IN WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS. Contracting Out The report of the Los Angeles County programs for contracting out of services under provisions of Proposition A can be found in the Major Issues section of this report. 40
-
R33The Grand Jury recommends that fiscal investigations of incorporated cities under the authority of Penal Code section 925a be vigorously pursued by future grand juries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 92 Page The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors pursue passage of SB 924 so that the authority for investigations of incorporated cities can be 41 Sept. expanded to include watchdog functions...........
-
R34THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PURSUE PASSAGE OF SB 924 SO THAT THE AUTHORITY FOR INVESTIGATIONS OF INCORPORATED CITIES CAN BE EXPANDED TO INCLUDE WATCHDOG FUNCTIONS. Sandra Klasky, Chair Maycie Herrington Jean Hitchcock 8.8 Edwin Kwoh Patricia Lofland Lidia Roth Eduardo Valdiviez 41
-
R35The Grand Jury recommends that 1983-84 and future grand juries place more emphasis on investigating fiscal mismanagement within cities of the 43 county...... The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors initiate
-
R36THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INITIATE LEGISLATION WHICH PROMULGATES PROVEN CITIZENSHIP ELIGIBILITY FOR CALIFORNIA VOTERS. COURT SUPPORT VIDEO SYSTEM The Criminal Justice Committee was made aware of the problems of congested calen- dars affecting the courts. Committee attention was directed to a modern technology which has successfully operated in the County of Santa Barbara since August 1981, known as the Court Support Video System. This two-way circuit television system enables probation officers and public defenders to communicate visually and audibly, within a five-mile radius, with defendants in custody at the Santa Barbara county jail. The efficiency and effectiveness of the system is evident in the county jail where inmate conferees are easily escorted to a holding tank adjacent to the video booth where the closed circuit television interviews are held. According to published reports, the Santa Barbara County Public Defender stated that the system exceeded expectations with respect to convenience and economy. Other officials of that county have been enthusiastic in supporting the use of the system. The estimated time saved through use of the video system amounts to one hour per staff person for each average investigation. Such a system is presently under study and consideration for use in Los Angeles County. Despite a lag due to some unresolved technical licensing, budgeting, legal, and procedural issues, we believe that early implementation would be of benefit to the county.
-
R37THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THE UTILIZATION OF SUCH A VIDEO SYSTEM IN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. 44
-
R38The Grand Jury recommends continued efforts toward reducing such delays consistent with the protection of the rights of the accused. This would 45 prove significantly beneficial in cost savings to the courts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that officer-involved cases of citizen death or great bodily injury in which the legality of officer conduct is not clearly established by the District Attorney's investigation be referred to the Grand 46 Jury for investigative hearing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
R40SYSTEM BE INSTALLED ON EACH LEVEL OF CELL ROWS AND DAY ROOMS IN CENTRAL JAIL TO MONITOR INMATE ACTIVITIES. In a follow-up of last year's Grand Jury report, the committee found that there is still a very serious need for additional holding cells in the Criminal Courts Building. It found that the space for these cells is available on three floors and was planned for this purpose in the initial construction. The requirement for these added cells grows out of various mandates with regard to mixing prisoners; i.e., men and women must not be mixed; juveniles must be kept separate from adults; the mentally ill must be separated; gang members, informants, homosexuals, highrisk and persons in the news all must be kept apart from other prisoners to protect them and/or other prisoners. THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT FOUR ADDITIONAL KEEP-AWAY
-
R41CELLS BE PROVIDED IN THE CRIMINAL COURTS BUILDING BY OPENING UP SPACE WHICH IS NOW SEALED OFF. The freight elevator at Central Jail is used to carry food to maximum security inmates and also to transport garbage. At the time of the inspection, the elevator was filthy and emitted a foul odor. THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE FREIGHT ELEVATOR AT
-
R42CENTRAL JAIL BE GIVEN A THOROUGH AND REGULARLY SCHEDULED CLEAN- ING, INCLUDING STEAM CLEANING, WIRE BRUSHING, AND DEODORIZING. After seven prisoners escaped from a Sheriff's Department bus while being transported to Peter Pitchess Honor Rancho, the Sheriff's Department indicated it would undertake alterations as each bus is scheduled for servicing or repairs. The alterations are to include installation of solid vertical bars over existing horizontal bars on rear windows, the side windows replaced with metal plates, and the repositioning of a second deputy's seat to allow full view of inmates as well as the road. THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE 1983-84 GRAND JURY MONI-
-
R43TOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE ALTERATIONS TO THE BUSES IN FUTURE JAIL INSPECTIONS. The custodial maintenance at some municipal jails is done by civilian personnel and indi- 1 2 cates a distinct lack of quality when compared to the same type of maintenance performed by trustees from the Sheriff's Department. · CrustonMinimum Inspection of the following facilities indicated unacceptable conditions: Harbor Division, Huntington Park jail, Maywood jail, Southeast Division, and Hollywood Division. There was extensive graffiti, vermin, and dirt-encrusted corners where mops cannot clean the sharp angles; light colored baseboards collect and keep the filth from the mopping. All of this reflects the generally poor maintenance. Similar conditions at both Southeast and Hollywood Divisions of the City of Los Angeles were noted by last year's Grand Jury. These conditions have been noted by previous grand juries and seem to point out the poor quality of services that the city receives from its custodial maintenance contractors. THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE CONDITIONS AT HARBOR,
-
R44HOLLYWOOD, AND SOUTHEAST DIVISION FACILITIES OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES BE CORRECTED IMMEDIATELY. THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE HUNTINGTON PARK AND
-
R45MAYWOOD JAILS EMPLOY EXTERMINATION SERVICES FOR ERADICATION OF COCKROACHES AND OTHER VERMIN. A GENERAL CLEANING IS NECESSARY FOR WALLS, FLOORS, AND SHOWERS. A SECOND VISIT WAS MADE TO THESE JAILS AND IT WAS FOUND THAT IMPROVEMENTS HAD NOT BEEN MADE EVEN THOUGH UNSANITARY CONDITIONS HAD BEEN POINTED OUT TO JAIL PERSON- NEL ON THE FIRST VISIT. Prisoners brought to the Santa Monica Courthouse are unloaded from the bus at a door adjacent to the public parking lot. No fence or wall separates the unloading of prisoners from the public parking lot, an indication of poor security. THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT A PRISONER UNLOADING EN-
-
R46CLOSURE BE PROVIDED ABUTTING THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SANTA MONICA COURTHOUSE TO ENSURE FULL SECURITY FOR THIS PROCEDURE. METAL ROLL-UP GATES AT EAST AND WEST EXTREMITIES OF THE ENCLOSURE SHOULD BE INCLUDED. The holding tanks at the Santa Monica Courthouse have no monitoring system for observa- tion of inmate activity within the tank and some of the doors are of wood construction. This condition represents an undue threat to the courtroom personnel and security of inmates. 49
-
R47THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT ELECTRONIC MONITORING SCAN- NERS BE INSTALLED SO THAT ALL HOLDING TANKS MAY BE VIEWED INDIVID- . UALLY FROM A CENTRAL STATION. WOODEN DOORS OF HOLDING TANKS SHOULD BE REPLACED BY METAL DOORS. Orlando Sloan, Chair William Cassius Celia Delgado Helene Eller Leo George Jennie Kerr Lori Kraus John Wisda - 50 ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS COMMITTEE PURPOSE The Environmental Concerns Committee was formed by this Grand Jury to investigate the progress made in waste management since the 1981-82 Grand Jury Report. AREAS OF REVIEW Recycling Resource Recovery Air Pollution Transportation of Hazardous Materials Landfills METHODS OF INVESTIGATION The committee conducted interviews with officials and private citizens concerned with the problem of waste disposal. It inspected various sites and facilities and attended meetings with groups representative of both government and private business. A complete list of persons interviewed, sites and facilities inspected, and group meetings attended can be found at the conclusion of this report.
-
R48THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE COUNTY OFFICIALS ENDORSE A RECYCLING POLICY AND ENCOURAGE OTHER CITIES IN THE COUNTY TO INITIATE RECYCLING PROGRAMS. Resource Recovery The Environmental Concerns Committee reviewed studies that have been made by the County Sanitation District, County Engineer, and private business interests engaged in waste disposal; then inspected two prototype facilities (BKK and Puente Hills) to find out the process involved in the recovery system. At the BKK Landfill in West Covina, the committee was given a detailed explanation of the process of capturing methane gas and converting it to electricity. At that time, gas was being burned at a high temperature to eliminate any possibility of contamination which would result in smog. The facility is also employing new techniques to recover from heavy metals and plating the materials which can be reused. At both the BKK and Puente Hills landfill sites, the committee saw massive installation of pipelines with the aggregate bed on which pipes must lay to put into operation the recovery of gas. Despite the enormous cost of the pipelines, it is generally recognized to be necessary for health, safety, and noxious odor control that we begin to think in terms of a resource recovery system. Though the facility for conversion of methane gas to electricity is in only partial production at Puente Hills, both BKK and Puente Hills are operating recovery systems fully endorsed by the Environmental Concerns Committee.
-
R49THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT A BASIC CONDITION FOR ISSUANCE OF OPERATING PERMITS FOR NEW LANDFILL SITES, AS WELL AS THOSE CURRENTLY IN OPERATION, BE THE INSTALLATION OF A GAS RECOVERY SYSTEM TO BE OPERATED UNDER SPECIFIED RULES AND REGULATIONS. Air Pollution The committee met several times with officials of the South Coast Air Quality Manage- ment District, toured their laboratory, and attended their hearings on infractions of air . 52 .
-
R51THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS SERIOUS CONSIDERATION BE GIVEN AGAIN TO REVIVING OPERATIONS AT TOYON CANYON AND CALABASSAS BY THE CITY AND COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AS A JOINT EFFORT IN THIS GROW- ING CRISIS.
-
R52THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT AN EXTENSION OF TIME BE PERMITTED FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION AND EXPANSION OF THE PUENTE HILLS FACILITY. SUSPENSION OF THIS AREA WOULD PLACE THE COUNTY IN AN EXTREMELY CRITICAL POSITION AS A RESULT OF SHORTAGE OF LANDFILL DISPOSAL CAPACITY.
-
R53THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE LICENSING OF BKK WEST COVINA BE CONTINUED SINCE THIS IS THE ONLY CLASS I LANDFILL AVAIL. ABLE FOR USE IN THIS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA. CLOSURE OF THIS OPERATION WOULD HAVE SERIOUS IMPACT ON THE DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC MATERIALS. CONCLUSION The recent news which brought attention to the serious mismanagement in the Federal Environment Protection Agency has done little to assuage public distrust and lack of confidence in landfills. Technical expertise and adequate enforcement is a must before the public will accept waste disposal facilities. No city can stand alone in the waste 54
-
R54THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INSIST THAT DEPARTMENTS 95 AND 95A BE RELOCATED TO A MORE SUITABLE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT WHERE HUMANE TREATMENT AND SURROUNDINGS CAN BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR BOTH THE MENTAL PATIENTS, THEIR FAMILIES, THE PETIT JURORS, AND THE STAFF WHO MUST ATTEND THEM.
-
R55THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE FACILITY AT 1150 NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD BE RENOVATED IMMEDIATELY ACCORDING TO THE EARLIER RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE 1981-82 GRAND JURY. DRINKING DRIVERS PROGRAM PURPOSE As a result of requests by a county supervisor and others, the Health Committee examined the procedures and practices employed in issuance of contracts per Assembly Bill 541, Drinking Driver Programs for first offenders. We were asked to examine the monitoring of these programs to ascertain whether they are effective and produce the desired results.
-
R56THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE CONTRACTS FOR FIRST OFFENDER PROGRAMS (AB 541) MUST INCLUDE UNIFORMITY IN THE FOLLOWING: FEE SCHEDULES; . TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR STAFF OPERATING THE REHABILI- . TATION PROGRAMS; PROGRAMMATIC REPORTING; • FREQUENCY OF MONITORING; • OBJECTIVES AND GOALS. .
-
R57THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: MANAGE AND MONITOR THE CONTRACTS; • SET STANDARDS FOR CONTRACT PERFORMANCE: . ESTABLISH AN APPEAL PROCESS FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS; • PURSUE ALL BREACH OF CONTRACTS. .
-
R58THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT HEALTH DEPARTMENT INVESTI- GATORS BE ASSIGNED AT EACH OF THE TRAFFIC COURTS IN THE COUNTY TO INSURE UNIFORMITY IN REFERRALS AND COURT MONITORING PROCEDURES.
-
R59THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT DEVISE AND MONITOR A FISCAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WHICH PROVIDES THE COUNTY ITS FULL REIMBURSEMENT.
-
R60THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLETHORA OF INVOLVED ADVISORS AND/OR COMMISSIONS BE COORDINATED TO SPEAK THROUGH ONE VOICE TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE OAAA.
-
R61THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT BECOME INVOLVED IN THE REHABILITATION ASPECTS OF THE DRINKING DRIVER PROGRAM. Juanita Dudley, Chair Helene Eller Jennie Kerr Patricia Lofland Eduardo Valdiviez 62
-
R62THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT ALL LINE STAFF RESPONSIBLE FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES BE ASSIGNED TO THE BUREAU OF SOCIAL SERVICES IN ORDER TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY AND TO EXPEDITE THE PROCESSING OF CASES.
-
R63THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE NEW REDESIGN ASSESSMENT SCALE BE BROADENED TO INCLUDE CASES OF CHILD ENDANGERMENT, AS WELL AS LIFE-THREATENING CASES.
-
R64THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT FUNDS BE DESIGNATED TO INCREASE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES WORKERS AND COMMENSURATE SUPPORT STAFF TO INCREASE THE QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF SERVICES PROVIDED. Judith Richardson, Chair Juan Godoy 58 Maycie Herrington Roberta Reddick Lidia Roth 65 HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY THE MUSIC AND PERFORMING ARTS COMMISSION: THE MUSIC CENTER OPERATING COMPANY; THE PERFORMING ARTS COUNCIL OF THE MUSIC CENTER THE MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY PURPOSE The County Library, with its 70 years of impressive history, has not been audited by the Grand Jury in recent years. We decided to conduct a partial review of the library services in meeting educational, recreational, and informational needs of the people in our county. We also reviewed various cost-effective measures taken by the library in order to maintain and improve its high standard of services and productivity. AREAS OF REVIEW Overview Sources of Financial Support Library Services Children's Services Cost Effective Measures Community Support METHODS OF INVESTIGATION The committee as a team conducted interviews with the county librarian and heads of several departments, inspected large regional libraries and the smaller community libraries, and reviewed relevant documents from the library administration and community libraries. 66
-
R65The Grand Jury recommends that capital funds be provided for new libraries to be constructed in high population growth areas to meet the edu- 67 cational and cultural needs of residents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
R66The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize a study of the salary scale among higher level employees of other county depart- ments and compare the findings with the salaries paid to comparable employees in the library system. Remuneration for library staff should be competitive in 67 order to secure and maintain well-trained personnel...............
-
R67The Grand Jury recommends that the library show the films under the sponsorship of Friends of the Library groups so that donations can be solicited 68 for the purpose of supporting library services..... The Grand Jury recommends the appointment of more children's librarians in the Los Angeles County library system so that our children can be better 70 serve in meeting their educational and recreational needs..........
-
R69The Grand Jury recommends that a work measurement study be made by library management to ascertain ways to improve productivity of library personnel..... The Grand Jury recommends that a division for community relations be established in an effort to create public awareness of library services and 71 citizens' responsibility for supporting the library system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that a letter of commendation be sent to Helen Kennedy for her 22 years of outstanding leadership and her dedicated service as a member and president of the Music and Performing Arts Commission. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that funding be allocated to develop a volunteer program. This is especially needed in the areas of publicity, pro- motion and fund raising from the private sector................. The Grand Jury recommends that sufficient free parking area be
-
R74THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE 1983-84 GRAND JURY MONITOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE CONTRACTING OUT POLICY AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SERVICES. Department of Purchasing and Stores The charter for Los Angeles County gives the Purchasing Agent exclusive legal responsibility for the purchase of all equipment and supplies. In addition, he supervises 290,000 square feet of warehouse with an inventory of $6 to $7 million. There is a high degree of public interest in department responsibility for large expenditures of govern- 8.8 ment money. Purchasing and Stores has been the object of a great many audits. Grand juries alone have conducted either full or partial audits in eight out of the last ten years. The implementation of audit recommendations is a vital part of an audit. In our review of the 1981-82 Grand Jury audit, the committee did not find adequate justification to support the Purchasing Agent's decision not to implement some of the recommendations. For example, several recommendations of the 1981-82 Grand Jury audit were concerned with the conflict of interest exposure that exists among employees. This Grand Jury concludes that the guidelines for employees remain vaguely defined. The Purchasing Agent has indicated an intention to revise the guidelines and expand disclosure forms in the Personnel Policy Manual.
-
R75THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE 1983-84 GRAND JURY PURSUE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REVISION OF THE PERSONNEL POLICY MANUAL IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PURCHASING AND STORES. Office of Public Administrator-Public Guardian The 1981-82 Grand Jury completed an audit of this department and made 19 recommendations. At the Grand Jury's specific request, the Continuity Committee called for a written status report which was received March 8, 1983. The department has made positive progress on the implementation of all the recommendations within its statutory authority. Of those, some are in their initial stages. For example, the hiring of a full-time procedure writer will facilitate compliance with several other recommendations. This department was contracting out services before the enactment of Proposition A. Credit is due the department for the follow-through on all contracts programs. We specifically took note of the procedures developed to monitor existing drayage and cleanup contracts. In addition, the department expects help from an audit the Chief Administrative Office was to complete in April of 1983 in the area of working standards.
-
R76THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, UPON COMPLETION OF ITS CURRENT AUDIT, MONITOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF ALL EXISTING AUDITS BEFORE AUTHORIZING NEW AUDITS. Department of Adoptions This Grand Jury accepts the responses of the Department of Adoptions to the recommendations of the 1981-82 Grand Jury as follows: The response indicated a top-heavy administrative condition — staff reductions have been achieved and there will be further reductions through attrition. The department does not agree with the finding that management tools are inadequate — the bimonthly tracking reports serve for review purposes. The department was specifically charged with finding 86
-
R77THE GRAND JURY COMMENDS THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR ITS LEGISLATIVE POSITION AND RECOMMENDS THAT IT DILIGENTLY PURSUE THE PROPOSAL OF THE 1981-82 GRAND JURY. 87