📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 26 findings
F1
The student handbook and the dance contract do not contain the necessary policies and procedures concerning the use of the alcohol detection device and the subsequent consequences.
F2
Staff and administration should have written policies and procedures concerning training and use of the alcohol detection device.
F3
All agencies have a cooperative working relationship and coordination of child abuse/neglect reporting and investigation. This is reflected in the establishment of the Multi-Disciplinary Interview Center and Suspected Child Abuse and Neglect Team. This enhances the effectiveness and efficiency of child abuse/neglect reporting and investigation.
F4
The Grand Jury was unable to verify that the agencies provide training for volunteers related to child abuse/neglect reporting.
F5
Residents of the Town of Loomis value their library services to the extent they have proposed a ballot measure to increase local sales tax to keep their library.
F6
Loomis and Meadow Vista residents’ needs regarding library services were not addressed. These communities were not included in the community conversations as conducted by the Placer County Library Services consultants.
F7
Both communities conducted their own surveys to address their needs and concerns. The majority of survey participants in each community indicated support to keep libraries open (See Attachments A and B).
F8
Colfax does not have a formal procedure to notify complainant of resolution.
F9
At the time of this report, Colfax is implementing a web-based citizen reporting system.
F10
Lincoln has a defined process in the Municipal Code for handling code enforcement complaints.
F11
Lincoln utilizes an informal bullet list as their guidelines for dealing with code enforcement complaints.
F12
Lincoln tracks complaints and actions in a spreadsheet, however it was not being kept current.
F13
Lincoln has multiple methods for a citizen to lodge a complaint.
F14
Lincoln does not have a formal procedure to notify complainant of resolution.
F15
Loomis has a defined process in the Municipal Code for handling code enforcement complaints.
F16
Loomis has informal procedures for dealing with code enforcement complaints, but they are not detailed in a written document.
F17
At this time residents of Loomis are limited to filing their complaint over the phone or in person at City Hall.
F18
The Town of Loomis website does not explain how to file a complaint while the new system is under development. Findings and Recommendations -2016 Final Report
F19
Loomis does not have a formal procedure to notify complainant of resolution.
F20
Rocklin has a defined process and tracking system for handling code enforcement complaints.
F21
Rocklin has informal procedures for dealing with code enforcement complaints, but they are not detailed in a written document.
F22
Rocklin has multiple methods for a citizen to lodge a complaint.
F23
Rocklin does not have a procedure to notify complainant of the resolution to their complaint.
F24
Roseville has a very good process in place to manage code enforcement complaints, including a tracking system.
F25
Roseville has an exceptional computer-based system to support code enforcement activities and accountability.
F26
Roseville keeps complainant informed regarding the status of their complaint.
Recommendations 11
-
R1Implement written policies and procedures for staff and administration regarding the training and use of the alcohol detection device.
-
R2Amend the dance contract and student handbook to include the alcohol screening policy and the consequences of a positive result.
-
R3At least six months prior to proposing a library closure the Placer County Library Services must hold local public forums and perform input surveys in every affected community.
-
R4The Supervisor of the impacted district should solicit input from their constituents prior to making library decisions. 21
-
R5Lincoln ensure that their written procedures address a process to keep the tracking log current.
-
R6The written code enforcement procedures include measures to keep complainant informed about the resolution to their complaint. 40
-
R7The written code enforcement procedures include measures to keep complainant informed about the resolution to their complaint.
-
R8Loomis include information on the website regarding how a citizen can file a complaint to report code violations. Recommendations Request for Responses Requiring Response Response Due Date Mr. Rick Angelocci R6, R7, R8 August 31, 2016 Loomis Town Manager 3665 Taylor Road Loomis, CA 95650 Copies sent to: Mr. Brian Baker Mayor, Town of Loomis 3665 Taylor Road Loomis, CA 95650 Ms. Crickett Strock Loomis Town Clerk 3665 Taylor Road Loomis, CA 95650 Ms. Carol Parker Loomis Administrative Clerk 3665 Taylor Road Loomis, CA 95650 City of Rocklin 42
-
R9Rocklin define their code enforcement procedures, including their tracking system, in a formal written document.
-
R10The written code enforcement procedures, in R9, include measures to keep complainant informed on the resolution to their complaint.
-
R11The Newcastle Fire Protection District maintain an accurate tracking log, from initiation to outcome, for all appeals and exception requests. Request for Responses: Recommendations Requiring Response Response Due Date Mr. Jim Jordan R1-R11 September 30, 2016 Chairman of the Board of Directors Newcastle Fire Protection District 461 Main Street Newcastle, CA 95658 Copies sent to: Mr. Andrew Sisk Placer County Auditor-Controller 2970 Richardson Drive Auburn, CA 95603 77