📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
Riverside County Grand Jury
• 2024-2025
5. 2023-2024 Riverside Civil Grand Jury, “911 call failed, now what?” Report
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 6 findings
F1
Page 17
Finding #1: The response from the Executive Office and Purchasing addresses vendor non-compliance but does not address the oversight performance of vendors for post awarded contracts. The response only addresses vendor non-compliance or non- performance.
F2
Page 17
Finding #6: This finding has been corrected following the conversion to PeopleSoft.
F3
Page 17
Finding #7: The County’s Internal Audit Division has improved the audits of the County’s vendor management.
F4
Page 17
Finding #1: The response from the Executive Office and Purchasing addresses vendor non-compliance but does not address the oversight performance of vendors for post awarded contracts. The response only addresses vendor non-compliance or non- performance.
F5
Page 17
Finding #6: This finding has been corrected following the conversion to PeopleSoft.
F6
Page 17
Finding #7: The County’s Internal Audit Division has improved the audits of the County’s vendor management.
Recommendations 2
-
R1Page 17Recommendation #1: The County does not assign a risk value to critical vendors but has agreed to review the recommendation.
-
R2Page 17Recommendation #2: The County should establish a performance review of vendors to help identify emerging issues. 16