📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Riverside County Grand Jury
• 2024-2025
5. 2023-2024 Riverside Civil Grand Jury, “911 call failed, now what?” Report
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 6 findings
F1
Page 17
Finding #1: The response from the Executive Office and Purchasing addresses vendor non-compliance but does not address the oversight performance of vendors for post awarded contracts. The response only addresses vendor non-compliance or non- performance.
F2
Page 17
Finding #6: This finding has been corrected following the conversion to PeopleSoft.
F3
Page 17
Finding #7: The County’s Internal Audit Division has improved the audits of the County’s vendor management.
F4
Page 17
Finding #1: The response from the Executive Office and Purchasing addresses vendor non-compliance but does not address the oversight performance of vendors for post awarded contracts. The response only addresses vendor non-compliance or non- performance.
F5
Page 17
Finding #6: This finding has been corrected following the conversion to PeopleSoft.
F6
Page 17
Finding #7: The County’s Internal Audit Division has improved the audits of the County’s vendor management.
Recommendations 2
-
R1Page 17Recommendation #1: The County does not assign a risk value to critical vendors but has agreed to review the recommendation.
-
R2Page 17Recommendation #2: The County should establish a performance review of vendors to help identify emerging issues. 16