⚠️ Aviso de traducción:
Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected:
F4, F6, F7, F8, F9
Findings and Recommendations
6 findings
Counsel disagrees with this finding to the extent that in order to comply with the State Attorney General Guidelines, any dispensary must be organized as a collective or cooperative.
No recommendations for this finding
Planning and zoning ordinances are enacted by action of the Board of Supervisors.
No recommendations for this finding
The Treasurer Tax-Collector is able to accurately state the number of licenses issued to date.
No recommendations for this finding
Counsel admits the finding, but adds the ordinance was never considered for action by the committee. Findings 7, 8, 9: Counsel has no specific information regarding these findings.
No recommendations for this finding
A tax initiative has always required a 2/3 vote of the electorate.
No recommendations for this finding
Bullet 1: Unincorporated County only. Bullet 2: Agree but only because 9.31 was never intended to deal with dispensaries. Public nuisances can still be dealt with through the various county departments. Bullet 3: The public safety impacts are currently being met, regardless of the existence of dispensaries. Bullet 4: Agree with the finding.
No recommendations for this finding
