Status of the Recommendations by the Civil Grand Jury

Recommendations 9

• R1
  Acoustics. With the help of an acoustical expert, develop a design for reducing the noise level with the objective of producing a quieter and therefore more calming environment in Jails #1 and #2. Investigate introducing sound-deadening textures or devices on walls and ceilings to help reduce the noise level.
• R2
  Colors. When repainting or replacing items, utilize colors from the overall color master plan of the new San Bruno Jail to replace the beige/ gray blandness in Jails #1 and #2.
• R3
  Art: Consider enhancing the prison environment by displaying prisoners’ art on some of the walls. 2005-06 San Francisco Jails: 1.3 Evaluate the physical environment of Jails #1 and #2 in the Hall of Justice and, if practical, apply some of Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. An Investigative Visit the environmental design concepts incorporated into the new San Bruno Jail, including a variety of colors, Implemented: Not noise reduction techniques, and art. We urge the City to include funds for these recommended design Warranted or Not improvements to the existing Jails #1 and #2 in the 2006-07 budget. Reasonable
• R4
  Acoustics. With the help of an acoustical expert, develop a design for reducing the noise level with the objective of producing a quieter and therefore more calming environment in Jails #1 and #2. Investigate introducing sound-deadening textures or devices on walls and ceilings to help reduce the noise level.
• R5
  Colors. When repainting or replacing items, utilize colors from the overall color master plan of the new San Bruno Jail to replace the beige/ gray blandness in Jails #1 and #2.
• R6
  Art: Consider enhancing the prison environment by displaying prisoners’ art on some of the walls. 2005-06 San Francisco Jails: 1.3 Evaluate the physical environment of Jails #1 and #2 in the Hall of Justice and, if practical, apply some of Sheriff’s Requires Further 3 – Acoustics: We have received no report on DPW’s efforts to analyze An Investigative Visit the environmental design concepts incorporated into the new San Bruno Jail, including a variety of colors, Department Analysis,Will Be this. noise reduction techniques, and art. We urge the City to include funds for these recommended design (SFSD) Implemented in the improvements to the existing Jails #1 and #2 in the 2006-07 budget. Future,Will Not Be 2 – Colors: No painting is underway due to serious jail overcrowding. It Implemented: Not is difficult to predict when we will be able to clear entire housing areas for
• R7
  Acoustics. With the help of an acoustical expert, develop a design for reducing the noise level with the Warranted or Not painting. objective of producing a quieter and therefore more calming environment in Jails #1 and #2. Reasonable Investigate introducing sound-deadening textures or devices on walls and ceilings to help reduce the noise 4 – Art: Not reasonable. Hanging art in the housing areas of the jails level. provides opportunities for hiding contraband and jail made weapons.
• R8
  Colors. When repainting or replacing items, utilize colors from the overall color master plan of the new San Bruno Jail to replace the beige/ gray blandness in Jails #1 and #2.
• R9
  Art: Consider enhancing the prison environment by displaying prisoners’ art on some of the walls. 2005-06 San Francisco Jails: 2.1 The continued recruitment and hiring of new deputies should be given top priority. The Department should Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. An Investigative Visit develop a coordinated recruitment outreach plan so that information about the current deputy recruitment Implemented: Not program is disseminated widely to community groups, peace officer associations, and web sites. Warranted or Not Reasonable 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco Jails: 2.1 The continued recruitment and hiring of new deputies should be given top priority. The Department should Sheriff’s Will Be Efforts continue. Funding has been requested in the 07-08 budget for An Investigative Visit develop a coordinated recruitment outreach plan so that information about the current deputy recruitment Department Implemented in the enhanced recruitment.. program is disseminated widely to community groups, peace officer associations, and web sites. (SFSD) Future 2005-06 San Francisco Jails: 2.2 The SFSD should consult with the Department of Telecommunications and Information Services (DTIS) toMayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. An Investigative Visit determine how to maximize the effectiveness of the SFSD website and how to ensure that the Department’s Implemented: Not recruitment efforts get maximum exposure on Google and other search engine web sites. Warranted or Not Reasonable 2005-06 San Francisco Jails: 2.2 The SFSD should consult with the Department of Telecommunications and Information Services (DTIS) toSheriff’s Will Be Funding requested in 07-08 budget. An Investigative Visit determine how to maximize the effectiveness of the SFSD website and how to ensure that the Department’s Department Implemented in the recruitment efforts get maximum exposure on Google and other search engine web sites. (SFSD) Future 2005-06 San Francisco Jails: 33..11 IItt iiss rreeccoommmmeennddeedd tthhaatt tthhee OOffffiiccee ooff tthhee MMaayyoorr pprroovviiddee lleeaaddeerrsshhiipp bbyy iissssuuiinngg aa ssttaatteemmeenntt ssuuppppoorrttiinngg aann Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: An Investigative Visit iinntteeggrraatteedd,, mmuullttii--aaggeennccyy aapppprrooaacchh ttoo pprrooggrraammss ffoorr pprriissoonneerrss rreelleeaasseedd ffrroomm ccuussttooddyy.. TThhiiss gglloobbaall aapppprrooaacchh Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit ccoouulldd ssttrreettcchh lliimmiitteedd ffuunnddiinngg bbyy ccoooorrddiinnaattiinngg eexxiissttiinngg ggoovveerrnnmmeennttaall rreessoouurrcceess wwiitthh ccoommmmuunniittyy aaggeenncciieess Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). mmeennttiioonneedd iinn tthhee ddiissccuussssiioonn sseeccttiioonn ooff tthhee rreeppoorrtt,, aass wweellll aass ssuucchh aaddddiittiioonnaall aaggeenncciieess aass WWaallddeenn HHoouussee,, tthhee Reasonable NNoorrtthheerrnn CCaalliiffoorrnniiaa SSeerrvviiccee LLeeaagguuee aanndd eessttaabblliisshheedd ddrruugg rreehhaabbiilliittaattiioonn pprrooggrraammss.. The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the IItt iiss aallssoo rreeccoommmmeennddeedd tthhaatt tthhee BBooaarrdd ooff SSuuppeerrvviissoorrss aanndd tthhee MMaayyoorr ffoollllooww uupp tthhee aabboovvee ssttaatteemmeenntt bbyy funding recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections afu pnidloint gp rao jpeiclot tt op rroejdeuctc eto r reecdiduicveis mre.c Siduivcihsm a. pSrougchra am p, rfougnrdaemd ,a ftu $n3d0e0d, 0a0t 0$ 3a0 y0e,0a0r 0fo ar yfievea ry feoar rfsiv, ec oyueladr sc,o cnosuisldt of 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the ac ofenwsi sstt aofff ae iftehwe rs wtaitfhf ieni tohre rin w citlohsine ocro innn celoctsioen c ownitnhe tchteio Sn FwSitDh .t hTeh eS pFrSoDgr. aTmh ew poruolgdr caomo rwdoinualdte c SoForSdDin amtee mSbFeSrDs recommendation. omr eomthbeerrss w ohr oo twhoeursld w choou nwsoeul ldp rcisoounnesresl apbriosuotn aevrsa ialabboleu ts aevraviiclaebsl ep rsieorrv tioc eres leparisoer taon rde lceoaosred iannadte c aococrdeisnsa ttoe tahcocsees ss etorv ticheoss ep ossetr-vriecleesa speo.s Tt-hreel eoabsjeec. tT whoeu oldb jbeec tt ow oeunlcdo buera tgoe e anncdo ufaracgilieta aten dre flaecailsiteadte p rreisleoanseersd tpor iasvoaniel rs to tahveamil stheelvmess eolfv ethso osfe t heoxisseti negx iostpinpgo rotupnpiotiretsu.nities. AAfftteerr ffoouurr yyeeaarrss ooff ooppeerraattiioonn,, tthhee CCiittyy wwoouulldd bbee iinn aa ppoossiittiioonn ttoo eevvaalluuaattee ssuucchh aa pprrooggrraamm.. IIff iitt iiss ffoouunndd tthhaatt recid recidivism has been reduced by even one per cent, enough money will have been saved to cover the cost of the program and the program should be continued. If the program reduces recidivism by a larger percentage, it would be a net savings to the City. If it fails to reduce recidivism, the City should consider what other means to reduce recidivism might be appropriate. 2005-06 San Francisco Jails: 33..11 IItt iiss rreeccoommmmeennddeedd tthhaatt tthhee OOffffiiccee ooff tthhee MMaayyoorr pprroovviiddee lleeaaddeerrsshhiipp bbyy iissssuuiinngg aa ssttaatteemmeenntt ssuuppppoorrttiinngg aann Mayor’s Office Recommendation The Mayor’s Office is providing funding support for re-entry programs.. An Investigative Visit iinntteeggrraatteedd,, mmuullttii--aaggeennccyy aapppprrooaacchh ttoo pprrooggrraammss ffoorr pprriissoonneerrss rreelleeaasseedd ffrroomm ccuussttooddyy.. TThhiiss gglloobbaall aapppprrooaacchh Implemented For example, the Sheriff’s Department has set aside $600,000 for ccoouulldd ssttrreettcchh lliimmiitteedd ffuunnddiinngg bbyy ccoooorrddiinnaattiinngg eexxiissttiinngg ggoovveerrnnmmeennttaall rreessoouurrcceess wwiitthh ccoommmmuunniittyy aaggeenncciieess community agencies to serve up to 100 prisoners who have been mmeennttiioonneedd iinn tthhee ddiissccuussssiioonn sseeccttiioonn ooff tthhee rreeppoorrtt,, aass wweellll aass ssuucchh aaddddiittiioonnaall aaggeenncciieess aass WWaallddeenn HHoouussee,, tthhee released beginning in October 2006. NNoorrtthheerrnn CCaalliiffoorrnniiaa SSeerrvviiccee LLeeaagguuee aanndd eessttaabblliisshheedd ddrruugg rreehhaabbiilliittaattiioonn pprrooggrraammss.. IItt iiss aallssoo rreeccoommmmeennddeedd tthhaatt tthhee BBooaarrdd ooff SSuuppeerrvviissoorrss aanndd tthhee MMaayyoorr ffoollllooww uupp tthhee aabboovvee ssttaatteemmeenntt bbyy funding afu pnidloint gp rao jpeiclot tt op rroejdeuctc eto r reecdiduicveis mre.c Siduivcihsm a. pSrougchra am p, rfougnrdaemd ,a ftu $n3d0e0d, 0a0t 0$ 3a0 y0e,0a0r 0fo ar yfievea ry feoar rfsiv, ec oyueladr sc,o cnosuisldt of ac ofenwsi sstt aofff ae iftehwe rs wtaitfhf ieni tohre rin w citlohsine ocro innn celoctsioen c ownitnhe tchteio Sn FwSitDh .t hTeh eS pFrSoDgr. aTmh ew poruolgdr caomo rwdoinualdte c SoForSdDin amtee mSbFeSrDs omr eomthbeerrss w ohr oo twhoeursld w choou nwsoeul ldp rcisoounnesresl apbriosuotn aevrsa ialabboleu ts aevraviiclaebsl ep rsieorrv tioc eres leparisoer taon rde lceoaosred iannadte c aococrdeisnsa ttoe tahcocsees ss etorv ticheoss ep ossetr-vriecleesa speo.s Tt-hreel eoabsjeec. tT whoeu oldb jbeec tt ow oeunlcdo buera tgoe e anncdo ufaracgilieta aten dre flaecailsiteadte p rreisleoanseersd tpor iasvoaniel rs to tahveamil stheelvmess eolfv ethso osfe t heoxisseti negx iostpinpgo rotupnpiotiretsu.nities. AAfftteerr ffoouurr yyeeaarrss ooff ooppeerraattiioonn,, tthhee CCiittyy wwoouulldd bbee iinn aa ppoossiittiioonn ttoo eevvaalluuaattee ssuucchh aa pprrooggrraamm.. IIff iitt iiss ffoouunndd tthhaatt recid recidivism has been reduced by even one per cent, enough money will have been saved to cover the cost of the program and the program should be continued. If the program reduces recidivism by a larger percentage, it would be a net savings to the City. If it fails to reduce recidivism, the City should consider what other means to reduce recidivism might be appropriate. 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco Jails: 33..11 IItt isis rreeccoommmmeennddeedd tthhaatt tthhee OOfffficicee ooff tthhee MMaayyoorr pprroovvididee leleaaddeerrsshhipip bbyy isisssuuiningg aa ssttaatteemmeenntt ssuuppppoorrttiningg aann Sheriff’s Recommendation While this specific program was not funded, the Sheriff’s Department An Investigative Visit inintteeggrraatteedd,, mmuultlti-i-aaggeennccyy aapppprrooaacchh ttoo pprrooggrraammss ffoorr pprrisisoonneerrss rreeleleaasseedd ffrroomm ccuussttooddyy.. TThhisis gglolobbaal l aapppprrooaacchh Department Implemented received funding to create a comprehensive re-entry program for recently ccoouuldld ssttrreettcchh lilmimititeedd ffuunnddiningg bbyy ccoooorrddininaattiningg eexxisisttiningg ggoovveerrnnmmeennttaal l rreessoouurrcceess wwitithh ccoommmmuunnitityy aaggeennccieiess (SFSD) released individual, called the No Violence Alliance, in September, 2006. mmeennttioionneedd inin tthhee ddisisccuussssioionn sseeccttioionn ooff tthhee rreeppoorrtt,, aass wweelll l aass ssuucchh aaddddititioionnaal l aaggeennccieiess aass WWaaldldeenn HHoouussee,, tthhee To date, more than 100 ex-offenders have been served., and statistics NNoorrtthheerrnn CCaalilfifoorrnniaia SSeerrvvicicee LLeeaagguuee aanndd eessttaabblilsishheedd ddrruugg rreehhaabbiliiltitaattioionn pprrooggrraammss.. measuring effectiveness are being collected. IItt isis aalslsoo rreeccoommmmeennddeedd tthhaatt tthhee BBooaarrdd ooff SSuuppeerrvvisisoorrss aanndd tthhee MMaayyoorr ffoollloloww uupp tthhee aabboovvee ssttaatteemmeenntt bbyy funding afu pnildoitn pgr ao jepcilot tt op rroejdeucct eto r erecdiduivcies mre.c Siduivcihs ma .p Srougcrha ma ,p fruongdraemd ,a ftu $n3d0e0d, 0a0t 0$ 3a0 y0e,0a0r 0fo ar fyiveea ry efoarr sfi,v eco yuelda rcso, ncsoiusltd o f ac ofenwsi sstt aofff ae iftehwer swtaitfhf ieni tohre irn w ciltohsine ocro ninn celcotsioen c wonithn ethcteio SnF wSiDth. tThhee S pFrSogDr.a Tmh ew opuroldg rcaomo rwdionualtde cSoFoSrdDin mateem SbFeSrsD omr eomthbeersrs w ohro o wthoeursld w choou nwsoeul lpdr icsoounnesrse la pbroisuotn aevrasi laabboleu ts aevrvaiiclaebsl ep rsioerr vtoic eresl eparisoer aton dre cleoaosred inaantde caococredsinsa ttoe tahcocsees sse trov itcheoss ep ossetr-vreicleeass peo. sTt-hree loebajseec.t Twhoeu oldb bjeec tt ow eonucldo ubrea gtoe eanncdo ufarcaiglieta aten dre flaecaislietadt ep rriesloenaesresd t op raisvoanile rs to tahveamils tehlevmess eolfv tehso soef tehxoissetin egx iosptipnogr toupnpitoiertsu.nities. AAfftteerr ffoouurr yyeeaarrss ooff ooppeerraattioionn,, tthhee CCitityy wwoouuldld bbee inin aa ppoossititioionn ttoo eevvaaluluaattee ssuucchh aa pprrooggrraamm.. IIff itit isis ffoouunndd tthhaatt recid recidivism has been reduced by even one per cent, enough money will have been saved to cover the cost of the program and the program should be continued. If the program reduces recidivism by a larger percentage, it would be a net savings to the City. If it fails to reduce recidivism, the City should consider what other means to reduce recidivism might be appropriate. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.1 Provide DTIS personnel with training to obtain the skills needed to demonstrate to City departments that Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information DTIS can go beyond the technical side of IT and provide effective project management, not just technical Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: services. IT vendors’ professional service contracts should include a provision mandating the training of City Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or IT employees in the use and maintenance of the relevant software and/or hardware, as appropriate. Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.1 Provide DTIS personnel with training to obtain the skills needed to demonstrate to City departments that Committee On Will Be Working closely with the Human Resources group within GSA, DTIS is Information DTIS can go beyond the technical side of IT and provide effective project management, not just technical Information Implemented in the embarking on a multi-year, multi-step plan to address professional Technology Highway: services. IT vendors’ professional service contracts should include a provision mandating the training of City Technology Future development at DTIS. DTIS is beginning with an assessment of Potholes or IT employees in the use and maintenance of the relevant software and/or hardware, as appropriate. (COIT) technology skills necessary for future development and operations, Possibilities assessing the current skills, and developing a gap analysis that will be the basis for a development plan. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.1 Provide DTIS personnel with training to obtain the skills needed to demonstrate to City departments that Department of Will Be Working closely with the Human Resources group within GSA, DTIS is Information DTIS can go beyond the technical side of IT and provide effective project management, not just technical TelecommunicatImplemented in the embarking on a multi-year, multi-step plan to address professional Technology Highway: services. IT vendors’ professional service contracts should include a provision mandating the training of City ions Services Future development at DTIS. DTIS is beginning with an assessment of Potholes or IT employees in the use and maintenance of the relevant software and/or hardware, as appropriate. technology skills necessary for future development and operations, Possibilities assessing the current skills, and developing a gap analysis that will be the basis for a development plan. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.1 Provide DTIS personnel with training to obtain the skills needed to demonstrate to City departments that General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information DTIS can go beyond the technical side of IT and provide effective project management, not just technical Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: services. IT vendors’ professional service contracts should include a provision mandating the training of City Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or IT employees in the use and maintenance of the relevant software and/or hardware, as appropriate. Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.1 Provide DTIS personnel with training to obtain the skills needed to demonstrate to City departments that Mayor’s Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information DTIS can go beyond the technical side of IT and provide effective project management, not just technical Implemented: Not Technology Highway: services. IT vendors’ professional service contracts should include a provision mandating the training of City Warranted or Not Potholes or IT employees in the use and maintenance of the relevant software and/or hardware, as appropriate. Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.2 Monitor and evaluate the success of “in house” training that is performed by professional services Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information contractors as a condition of future contracts. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.2 Monitor and evaluate the success of “in house” training that is performed by professional services Committee On Requires Further DTIS is working with the Office of Contract Administration (OCA) to Information contractors as a condition of future contracts. Information Analysis determine the most efficient way to implement this recommendation. Technology Highway: Technology Potholes or (COIT) Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.2 Monitor and evaluate the success of “in house” training that is performed by professional services Department of Requires Further DTIS is working with the Office of Contract Administration (OCA) to Information contractors as a condition of future contracts. TelecommunicatAnalysis determine the most efficient way to implement this recommendation. Technology Highway: ions Services Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.2 Monitor and evaluate the success of “in house” training that is performed by professional services General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information contractors as a condition of future contracts. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.2 Monitor and evaluate the success of “in house” training that is performed by professional services Mayor’s Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information contractors as a condition of future contracts. Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.3 Restructure IT functions around a “hybrid” model. Services and functions common to all 64 City Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information departments should be centralized. IT functions specific and unique to individual departments should continue Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: to remain in those departments. Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.3 Restructure IT functions around a “hybrid” model. Services and functions common to all 64 City Committee On Will Be A first step toward achieving this goal is to clearly understand the current Information departments should be centralized. IT functions specific and unique to individual departments should continue Information Implemented in the state of technology architecture, operations, applications, E-Government Technology Highway: to remain in those departments. Technology Future services, etc in the City. With this information, a formal plan will be Potholes or (COIT) developed to implement the hybrid model. As a result, DTIS will include Possibilities in its FY 07-08 budget, funding for a Citywide Technology Assessment. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.3 Restructure IT functions around a “hybrid” model. Services and functions common to all 64 City Department of Will Be A first step toward achieving this goal is to clearly understand the current Information departments should be centralized. IT functions specific and unique to individual departments should continue TelecommunicatImplemented in the state of technology architecture, operations, applications, E-Government Technology Highway: to remain in those departments. ions Services Future services, etc in the City. With this information, a formal plan will be Potholes or developed to implement the hybrid model. As a result, DTIS will include Possibilities in its FY 07-08 budget, funding for a Citywide Technology Assessment. 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.3 Restructure IT functions around a “hybrid” model. Services and functions common to all 64 City General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information departments should be centralized. IT functions specific and unique to individual departments should continue Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: to remain in those departments. Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.3 Restructure IT functions around a “hybrid” model. Services and functions common to all 64 City Mayor’s Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information departments should be centralized. IT functions specific and unique to individual departments should continue Implemented: Not Technology Highway: to remain in those departments. Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.4 The person who oversees IT activities citywide should be elevated to a Chief Information Officer. Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.4 The person who oversees IT activities citywide should be elevated to a Chief Information Officer. Committee On Recommendation The Executive Director of the DTIS is now the Chief Information Officer Information Information Implemented for the City. Technology Highway: Technology Potholes or (COIT) Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.4 The person who oversees IT activities citywide should be elevated to a Chief Information Officer. Department of Recommendation The Executive Director of the DTIS is now the Chief Information Officer Information TelecommunicatImplemented for the City. Technology Highway: ions Services Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.4 The person who oversees IT activities citywide should be elevated to a Chief Information Officer. General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.4 The person who oversees IT activities citywide should be elevated to a Chief Information Officer. Mayor’s Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.5 Make changes to the Administrative Code to strengthen DTIS as proposed in public forums by both the Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information City Administrator and the DTIS Executive Director. The CGJ strongly supports their recommendations. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.5 Make changes to the Administrative Code to strengthen DTIS as proposed in public forums by both the Committee On Requires Further Changes to the Administrative Code have been drafted. It is difficult to Information City Administrator and the DTIS Executive Director. The CGJ strongly supports their recommendations. Information Analysis anticipate the complete set of changes required to implement this Technology Highway: Technology recommendation without the Citywide Technology Assessment. The CIO Potholes or (COIT) will continue to work with the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, and COIT Possibilities to determine next steps. 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.5 Make changes to the Administrative Code to strengthen DTIS as proposed in public forums by both the Department of Requires Further Changes to the Administrative Code have been drafted. It is difficult to Information City Administrator and the DTIS Executive Director. The CGJ strongly supports their recommendations. TelecommunicatAnalysis anticipate the complete set of changes required to implement this Technology Highway: ions Services recommendation without the Citywide Technology Assessment. The CIO Potholes or will continue to work with the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, and COIT Possibilities to determine next steps. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.5 Make changes to the Administrative Code to strengthen DTIS as proposed in public forums by both the General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information City Administrator and the DTIS Executive Director. The CGJ strongly supports their recommendations. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.5 Make changes to the Administrative Code to strengthen DTIS as proposed in public forums by both the Mayor’s Requires Further We will work with DTIS to determine what changes in the Administrative Information City Administrator and the DTIS Executive Director. The CGJ strongly supports their recommendations. Analysis Code, if any, are appropriate and should be implemented. Technology Highway: Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.6 Mayor Newsom and the Board of Supervisors should provide adequate funding for departments to Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information implement the IT vision presented at the COIT meeting on March 30, 2006. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.6 Mayor Newsom and the Board of Supervisors should provide adequate funding for departments to Committee On Will Be The Mayor and Board of Supervisors are committed to a productive Information implement the IT vision presented at the COIT meeting on March 30, 2006. Information Implemented in the technology community in the City. The FY 07-08 budget is now in Technology Highway: Technology Future process and the CIO, COIT, and DTIS will diligently work to gain Potholes or (COIT) adequate funding for initiatives. Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.6 Mayor Newsom and the Board of Supervisors should provide adequate funding for departments to Department of Will Be The Mayor and Board of Supervisors are committed to a productive Information implement the IT vision presented at the COIT meeting on March 30, 2006. TelecommunicatImplemented in the technology community in the City. The FY 07-08 budget is now in Technology Highway: ions Services Future process and the CIO, COIT, and DTIS will diligently work to gain Potholes or adequate funding for initiatives. Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.6 Mayor Newsom and the Board of Supervisors should provide adequate funding for departments to General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information implement the IT vision presented at the COIT meeting on March 30, 2006. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 1.6 Mayor Newsom and the Board of Supervisors should provide adequate funding for departments to Mayor’s Will Be The Mayor is committed to a productive technology community in the Information implement the IT vision presented at the COIT meeting on March 30, 2006. Implemented in the City. The FY 07-08 budget is now in process and we will work with CIO, Technology Highway: Future COIT, and DTIS to ensure adequate funding for initiatives within the Potholes or constraints of the City’s budgets. Possibilities 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.1 Restructure COIT so that it is a recognized and functional policy-making body that defines the direction of Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information IT in the City. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.1 Restructure COIT so that it is a recognized and functional policy-making body that defines the direction of Committee On Will Be Restructuring of COIT is underway. The Committee has been Information IT in the City. Information Implemented in the reenergized with a change in membership including the addition of the Technology Highway: Technology Future City’s CAO, the expansion of subcommittees for analyzing, Potholes or (COIT) recommending, and implementing better technology planning, budgeting, Possibilities and operations, and will be supported with new staff positions. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.1 Restructure COIT so that it is a recognized and functional policy-making body that defines the direction of Department of Will Be Restructuring of COIT is underway. The Committee has been Information IT in the City. TelecommunicatImplemented in the reenergized with a change in membership including the addition of the Technology Highway: ions Services Future City’s CAO, the expansion of subcommittees for analyzing, Potholes or recommending, and implementing better technology planning, budgeting, Possibilities and operations, and will be supported with new staff positions. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.1 Restructure COIT so that it is a recognized and functional policy-making body that defines the direction of General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information IT in the City. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.1 Restructure COIT so that it is a recognized and functional policy-making body that defines the direction of Mayor’s Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information IT in the City. Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.2 Ensure that the City’s policy-making IT body (currently COIT) meets regularly (e.g., monthly or bimonthly).Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.2 Ensure that the City’s policy-making IT body (currently COIT) meets regularly (e.g., monthly or bimonthly).Committee On Recommendation This recommendation was implemented at the December 2006 meeting Information Information Implemented where a monthly meeting schedule was proposed and approved. Technology Highway: Technology Potholes or (COIT) Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.2 Ensure that the City’s policy-making IT body (currently COIT) meets regularly (e.g., monthly or bimonthly).Department of Recommendation This recommendation was implemented at the December 2006 meeting Information TelecommunicatImplemented where a monthly meeting schedule was proposed and approved. Technology Highway: ions Services Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.2 Ensure that the City’s policy-making IT body (currently COIT) meets regularly (e.g., monthly or bimonthly).General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.2 Ensure that the City’s policy-making IT body (currently COIT) meets regularly (e.g., monthly or bimonthly).Mayor’s Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.3. Amend the Administrative Code so that only documents that are realistic and necessary are required to Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information justify each department’s IT planning and expenditures. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.3. Amend the Administrative Code so that only documents that are realistic and necessary are required to Committee On Requires Further Changes to the Administrative Code have been drafted. The CIO will Information justify each department’s IT planning and expenditures. Information Analysis continue to work with the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, and COIT to Technology Highway: Technology determine next steps. Potholes or (COIT) Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.3. Amend the Administrative Code so that only documents that are realistic and necessary are required to Department of Requires Further Changes to the Administrative Code have been drafted. The CIO will Information justify each department’s IT planning and expenditures. TelecommunicatAnalysis continue to work with the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, and COIT to Technology Highway: ions Services determine next steps. Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.3. Amend the Administrative Code so that only documents that are realistic and necessary are required to General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information justify each department’s IT planning and expenditures. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.3. Amend the Administrative Code so that only documents that are realistic and necessary are required to Mayor’s Requires Further We will work with DTIS to determine what changes in the Administrative Information justify each department’s IT planning and expenditures. Analysis Code, if any, are appropriate and should be implemented. Technology Highway: Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.4 Institute a policy that outlines budget consequences for City departments that do not comply with the Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information Administrative Code. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.4 Institute a policy that outlines budget consequences for City departments that do not comply with the Committee On Requires Further Changes to the Administrative Code have been drafted. The CIO will Information Administrative Code. Information Analysis continue to work with the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, and COIT to Technology Highway: Technology determine next steps. Potholes or (COIT) Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.4 Institute a policy that outlines budget consequences for City departments that do not comply with the Department of Requires Further Changes to the Administrative Code have been drafted. The CIO will Information Administrative Code. TelecommunicatAnalysis continue to work with the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, and COIT to Technology Highway: ions Services determine next steps. Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.4 Institute a policy that outlines budget consequences for City departments that do not comply with the General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information Administrative Code. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 2.4 Institute a policy that outlines budget consequences for City departments that do not comply with the Mayor’s Requires Further We will work with DTIS to determine what changes in the Administrative Information Administrative Code. Analysis Code, if any, are appropriate and should be implemented. Technology Highway: Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.1 The CIO, as part of the budget process, should review departmental IT plans. Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.1 The CIO, as part of the budget process, should review departmental IT plans. Committee On Will Be This recommendation will be implemented as part of the work of the Information Information Implemented in the budgeting and planning subcommittee of COIT. The subcommittee Technology Highway: Technology Future membership is now finalized and the subcommittee will now meet and Potholes or (COIT) begin the process of developing its goals, objectives, and procedures. Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.1 The CIO, as part of the budget process, should review departmental IT plans. Department of Will Be This recommendation will be implemented as part of the work of the Information TelecommunicatImplemented in the budgeting and planning subcommittee of COIT. The subcommittee Technology Highway: ions Services Future membership is now finalized and the subcommittee will now meet and Potholes or begin the process of developing its goals, objectives, and procedures. Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.1 The CIO, as part of the budget process, should review departmental IT plans. General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.1 The CIO, as part of the budget process, should review departmental IT plans. Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.1 The CIO, as part of the budget process, should review departmental IT plans. Office of Will Not Be This recommendation is not a policy issue for the Office of Contract Information Contract Implemented: Not Administration. Technology Highway: Administration Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.2 The CIO or his designee should review IT contracts to ensure that a "whole city" point of view is followed.Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.2 The CIO or his designee should review IT contracts to ensure that a "whole city" point of view is followed.Committee On Will Be The first step of this recommendation was implemented in 2006 when Information Information Implemented in the DTIS, on behalf of COIT and the City, began reviewing all requests for Technology Highway: Technology Future technology purchases in the City. With this knowledge, DTIS is beginning Potholes or (COIT) the next phase of determining which contracts have city-wide impact, and Possibilities developing a plan to develop city-wide contracts. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.2 The CIO or his designee should review IT contracts to ensure that a "whole city" point of view is followed.Department of Will Be The first step of this recommendation was implemented in 2006 when Information TelecommunicatImplemented in the DTIS, on behalf of COIT and the City, began reviewing all requests for Technology Highway: ions Services Future technology purchases in the City. With this knowledge, DTIS is beginning Potholes or the next phase of determining which contracts have city-wide impact, and Possibilities developing a plan to develop city-wide contracts. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.2 The CIO or his designee should review IT contracts to ensure that a "whole city" point of view is followed.General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.2 The CIO or his designee should review IT contracts to ensure that a "whole city" point of view is followed.Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.2 The CIO or his designee should review IT contracts to ensure that a "whole city" point of view is followed.Office of Will Not Be This recommendation is not a policy issue for the Office of Contract Information Contract Implemented: Not Administration. Technology Highway: Administration Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.3 Ensure that COIT or a similar citywide IT planning structure is recognized as the policymaking group that Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information defines the City’s direction for all City departments. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.3 Ensure that COIT or a similar citywide IT planning structure is recognized as the policymaking group that Committee On Will Be The revised COIT structure, membership, and meeting structure is the Information defines the City’s direction for all City departments. Information Implemented in the first step in meeting this recommendation. It will be enhanced by the Technology Highway: Technology Future drafted changes to the administrative code. Potholes or (COIT) Possibilities 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.3 Ensure that COIT or a similar citywide IT planning structure is recognized as the policymaking group that Department of Will Be The revised COIT structure, membership, and meeting structure is the Information defines the City’s direction for all City departments. TelecommunicatImplemented in the first step in meeting this recommendation. It will be enhanced by the Technology Highway: ions Services Future drafted changes to the administrative code. Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.3 Ensure that COIT or a similar citywide IT planning structure is recognized as the policymaking group that General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information defines the City’s direction for all City departments. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.3 Ensure that COIT or a similar citywide IT planning structure is recognized as the policymaking group that Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information defines the City’s direction for all City departments. Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.3 Ensure that COIT or a similar citywide IT planning structure is recognized as the policymaking group that Office of Will Not Be This recommendation is not a policy issue for the Office of Contract Information defines the City’s direction for all City departments. Contract Implemented: Not Administration. Technology Highway: Administration Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.4 Restructure DTIS so that services common to all City departments are centralized there. Specifically, Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information these services would include but would not be limited to: network and communications infrastructure, desktop Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: management, data center operations, centralized project management, e-mail, and help desk functions. Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.4 Restructure DTIS so that services common to all City departments are centralized there. Specifically, Committee On Requires Further Changes to the Administrative Code have been drafted. It is difficult to Information these services would include but would not be limited to: network and communications infrastructure, desktop Information Analysis anticipate the complete set of changes required to implement this Technology Highway: management, data center operations, centralized project management, e-mail, and help desk functions. Technology recommendation without the Citywide Technology Assessment. The CIO Potholes or (COIT) will continue to work with the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, and COIT Possibilities to determine next steps. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.4 Restructure DTIS so that services common to all City departments are centralized there. Specifically, Department of Requires Further Changes to the Administrative Code have been drafted. It is difficult to Information these services would include but would not be limited to: network and communications infrastructure, desktop TelecommunicatAnalysis anticipate the complete set of changes required to implement this Technology Highway: management, data center operations, centralized project management, e-mail, and help desk functions. ions Services recommendation without the Citywide Technology Assessment. The CIO Potholes or will continue to work with the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, and COIT Possibilities to determine next steps. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.4 Restructure DTIS so that services common to all City departments are centralized there. Specifically, General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information these services would include but would not be limited to: network and communications infrastructure, desktop Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: management, data center operations, centralized project management, e-mail, and help desk functions. Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.4 Restructure DTIS so that services common to all City departments are centralized there. Specifically, Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information these services would include but would not be limited to: network and communications infrastructure, desktop Implemented: Not Technology Highway: management, data center operations, centralized project management, e-mail, and help desk functions. Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.4 Restructure DTIS so that services common to all City departments are centralized there. Specifically, Office of Will Not Be This recommendation is not a policy issue for the Office of Contract Information these services would include but would not be limited to: network and communications infrastructure, desktop Contract Implemented: Not Adminstration. Technology Highway: management, data center operations, centralized project management, e-mail, and help desk functions. Administration Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.5 DTIS should provide assistance to small departments to help determine and meet their technology Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information requirements. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.5 DTIS should provide assistance to small departments to help determine and meet their technology Committee On Requires Further DTIS held a meeting with the City Administrator and representatives from Information requirements. Information Analysis the large City IT departments. As a result of this meeting, a commitment Technology Highway: Technology was gained that these departments would develop ways to help smaller Potholes or (COIT) departments. Follow-up meetings will be scheduled. Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.5 DTIS should provide assistance to small departments to help determine and meet their technology Department of Requires Further DTIS held a meeting with the City Administrator and representatives from Information requirements. TelecommunicatAnalysis the large City IT departments. As a result of this meeting, a commitment Technology Highway: ions Services was gained that these departments would develop ways to help smaller Potholes or departments. Follow-up meetings will be scheduled. Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.5 DTIS should provide assistance to small departments to help determine and meet their technology General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information requirements. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.5 DTIS should provide assistance to small departments to help determine and meet their technology Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information requirements. Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.5 DTIS should provide assistance to small departments to help determine and meet their technology Office of Will Not Be This recommendation is not a policy issue for the Office of Contract Information requirements. Contract Implemented: Not Administration. Technology Highway: Administration Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.6 Conduct an inventory of the City’s current IT holdings. This would include location and age of software Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information and hardware plus the duration and terms of both maintenance and professional services contracts. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.6 Conduct an inventory of the City’s current IT holdings. This would include location and age of software Committee On Will Be DTIS will include in its FY 07-08 budget, funding for a Citywide Information and hardware plus the duration and terms of both maintenance and professional services contracts. Information Implemented in the Technology Assessment. Technology Highway: Technology Future Potholes or (COIT) Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.6 Conduct an inventory of the City’s current IT holdings. This would include location and age of software Department of Will Be DTIS will include in its FY 07-08 budget, funding for a Citywide Information and hardware plus the duration and terms of both maintenance and professional services contracts. TelecommunicatImplemented in the Technology Assessment. Technology Highway: ions Services Future Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.6 Conduct an inventory of the City’s current IT holdings. This would include location and age of software General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information and hardware plus the duration and terms of both maintenance and professional services contracts. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.6 Conduct an inventory of the City’s current IT holdings. This would include location and age of software Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information and hardware plus the duration and terms of both maintenance and professional services contracts. Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 3.6 Conduct an inventory of the City’s current IT holdings. This would include location and age of software Office of Will Not Be This recommendation is not a policy issue for the Office of Contract Information and hardware plus the duration and terms of both maintenance and professional services contracts. Contract Implemented: Not Administration. Technology Highway: Administration Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.1 Empower a CIO who has a blend of technical expertise and political dexterity to take over IT development. Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information This position should be a Mayoral Cabinet position and have a long term contract similar to those of the City Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Administrator or the Controller. Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.1 Empower a CIO who has a blend of technical expertise and political dexterity to take over IT development. Department of Requires Further The structure of the City and County of San Francisco is not the same as Information This position should be a Mayoral Cabinet position and have a long term contract similar to those of the City TelecommunicatAnalysis other cities. For example, a cabinet-level position does not exist here as Technology Highway: Administrator or the Controller. ions Services it does in Philadelphia. The department head classification of DTIS has Potholes or been upgraded. This recommendation is under review. Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.1 Empower a CIO who has a blend of technical expertise and political dexterity to take over IT development. General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information This position should be a Mayoral Cabinet position and have a long term contract similar to those of the City Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Administrator or the Controller. Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.1 Empower a CIO who has a blend of technical expertise and political dexterity to take over IT development. Mayor’s Office Requires Further We have created a new CIO position at DTIS. However, we will are Information This position should be a Mayoral Cabinet position and have a long term contract similar to those of the City Analysis determining whether if additional action needs to take place regarding the Technology Highway: Administrator or the Controller. CIO position. It is worth noting that the positions of the City Administrator Potholes or and the Controller are of durations that exceed a single Mayoral term. Possibilities Additionally, the City Administrator and the Controller are both Charter positions with terms set forth in the Charter. We will review this over the next six months to determine the most appropriate action, if any. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.2 Adopt an IT vision with specific short-term actions, backed by the political will and resources necessary to Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information move it forward. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.2 Adopt an IT vision with specific short-term actions, backed by the political will and resources necessary to Department of Requires Further The reenergized COIT is in the process of developing a technology vision Information move it forward. TelecommunicatAnalysis for the City. The vision is developed with each meeting and will be furthe Technology Highway: ions Services enhanced by the work of the Subcommittees now being formed. Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.2 Adopt an IT vision with specific short-term actions, backed by the political will and resources necessary to General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information move it forward. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.2 Adopt an IT vision with specific short-term actions, backed by the political will and resources necessary to Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information move it forward. Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.3 Create a new organizational name for DTIS and redefine its powers so that other departments recognize Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information DTIS as the department responsible for IT governance. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.3 Create a new organizational name for DTIS and redefine its powers so that other departments recognize Department of Will Be A new name for COIT and for DTIS has been suggested as part of the Information DTIS as the department responsible for IT governance. TelecommunicatImplemented in the revised Administrative Code. Likewise, the roles and responsibilities of Technology Highway: ions Services Future COIT and DTIS have been enhanced in the draft code changes. Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.3 Create a new organizational name for DTIS and redefine its powers so that other departments recognize General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information DTIS as the department responsible for IT governance. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.3 Create a new organizational name for DTIS and redefine its powers so that other departments recognize Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information DTIS as the department responsible for IT governance. Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.4 Think “hybrid!” DTIS should include a high-level transition plan for moving the City from its current Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information decentralized structure to one that combines centralization and decentralization. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.4 Think “hybrid!” DTIS should include a high-level transition plan for moving the City from its current Department of Will Be Changes to the Administrative Code have been drafted. It is difficult to Information decentralized structure to one that combines centralization and decentralization. TelecommunicatImplemented in the anticipate the complete set of changes required to implement this Technology Highway: ions Services Future recommendation without the Citywide Technology Assessment. The CIO Potholes or will continue to work with the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, and COIT Possibilities to determine next steps. 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.4 Think “hybrid!” DTIS should include a high-level transition plan for moving the City from its current General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information decentralized structure to one that combines centralization and decentralization. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.4 Think “hybrid!” DTIS should include a high-level transition plan for moving the City from its current Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information decentralized structure to one that combines centralization and decentralization. Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.5 Consider a centralized IT governance strategy and the formation of new IT support groups to provide input Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information and expertise in areas such as: Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: ▪ A citywide policy-level group responsible for developing priorities, standards, and methods. Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or ▪ A group that would encourage interdepartmental sharing and cooperation. Reasonable Possibilities ▪ A technical advisory group to provide technical review of projects, departmental system plans, and oversee The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but the implementation of projects. does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.5 Consider a centralized IT governance strategy and the formation of new IT support groups to provide input Department of Recommendation Restructuring of COIT is underway. The Committee has been Information and expertise in areas such as: TelecommunicatImplemented reenergized with a change in membership including the addition of the Technology Highway: ▪ A citywide policy-level group responsible for developing priorities, standards, and methods. ions Services City’s CAO, the expansion of subcommittees for analyzing, Potholes or ▪ A group that would encourage interdepartmental sharing and cooperation. recommending, and implementing better technology planning, budgeting, Possibilities ▪ A technical advisory group to provide technical review of projects, departmental system plans, and oversee and operations, and will be supported with new staff positions. the implementation of projects. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.5 Consider a centralized IT governance strategy and the formation of new IT support groups to provide input General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information and expertise in areas such as: Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: ▪ A citywide policy-level group responsible for developing priorities, standards, and methods. Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or ▪ A group that would encourage interdepartmental sharing and cooperation. Reasonable Possibilities ▪ A technical advisory group to provide technical review of projects, departmental system plans, and oversee the implementation of projects. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.5 Consider a centralized IT governance strategy and the formation of new IT support groups to provide input Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information and expertise in areas such as: Implemented: Not Technology Highway: ▪ A citywide policy-level group responsible for developing priorities, standards, and methods. Warranted or Not Potholes or ▪ A group that would encourage interdepartmental sharing and cooperation. Reasonable Possibilities ▪ A technical advisory group to provide technical review of projects, departmental system plans, and oversee the implementation of projects. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.6 Reduce replication and redundancy and improve information sharing among departments by consolidating Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information common applications. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.6 Reduce replication and redundancy and improve information sharing among departments by consolidating Department of Will Be Changes to the Administrative Code have been drafted. It is difficult to Information common applications. TelecommunicatImplemented in the anticipate the complete set of changes required to implement this Technology Highway: ions Services Future recommendation without the Citywide Technology Assessment. The CIO Potholes or will continue to work with the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, and COIT Possibilities to determine next steps. 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.6 Reduce replication and redundancy and improve information sharing among departments by consolidating General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information common applications. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.6 Reduce replication and redundancy and improve information sharing among departments by consolidating Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information common applications. Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.7 Tie departmental IT plans to the budget process that is overseen by the CIO. Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.7 Tie departmental IT plans to the budget process that is overseen by the CIO. Department of Will Be The Planning and Budgeting Subcommittee is the first Subcommittee Information TelecommunicatImplemented in the under the new COIT to be formed. It is in the process of developing its Technology Highway: ions Services Future goals and objectives, policies and procedures. It is anticipated that this Potholes or recommendation will be incorporated into those operating procedures. Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.7 Tie departmental IT plans to the budget process that is overseen by the CIO. General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 4.7 Tie departmental IT plans to the budget process that is overseen by the CIO. Mayor’s Office Will Be This year we have included a Technology request form to department’s Information Implemented in the budget submission so we can coordinate all the IT projects in the City. Technology Highway: Future Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 5.1 Elevate the classification and position of DTIS Executive Director and establish the management position Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information of CIO with commensurate salary. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 5.1 Elevate the classification and position of DTIS Executive Director and establish the management position Department of Recommendation The classification for the DTIS Executive Director has been upgraded and Information of CIO with commensurate salary. TelecommunicatImplemented the salary is commensurate with the new grade. Technology Highway: ions Services Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 5.1 Elevate the classification and position of DTIS Executive Director and establish the management position General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information of CIO with commensurate salary. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 5.1 Elevate the classification and position of DTIS Executive Director and establish the management position Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information of CIO with commensurate salary. Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 5.2 Re-evaluate the classification of the CIO position for FY 2006-2007 with the eventual goal of reclassifying Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information the position to Department Head V. Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 5.2 Re-evaluate the classification of the CIO position for FY 2006-2007 with the eventual goal of reclassifying Department of Recommendation The classification for the DTIS Executive Director has been upgraded Information the position to Department Head V. TelecommunicatImplemented from a Department Head III to a Department Head IV and the salary is Technology Highway: ions Services commensurate with the new grade. As the rebuilding of technology Potholes or governance and operations continue, the appropriate classification of the Possibilities CIO position will be reevaluated. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 5.2 Re-evaluate the classification of the CIO position for FY 2006-2007 with the eventual goal of reclassifying General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information the position to Department Head V. Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 5.2 Re-evaluate the classification of the CIO position for FY 2006-2007 with the eventual goal of reclassifying Mayor’s Office Will Not Be Does not pertain to the Mayor’s Office. See Department Response Information the position to Department Head V. Implemented: Not Technology Highway: Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 5.3 Ensure, as a part of a restructured IT governance body, that the CIO is provided with the authority needed Board of Will Not Be The Board of Supervisors held hearings on the Civil Grand Jury Reports: Information to overhaul the City’s fragmented system and oversee all aspects of the City’s IT. Philadelphia provides a Supervisors Implemented: Not City Services and Rules Committees (2003-2004) and Government Audit Technology Highway: working example of this. Warranted or Not and Oversight Committee (2004-2005 and 2005-02006). Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities The Board supports the recommendation of the Civil Grand Jury, but does not have the operational authority to implement the recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933.005(a) and (b), the Board will not be implementing the recommendation. 2005-06 San Francisco’s 5.3 Ensure, as a part of a restructured IT governance body, that the CIO is provided with the authority needed Department of Will Be Changes to the Administrative Code have been drafted. The CIO will Information to overhaul the City’s fragmented system and oversee all aspects of the City’s IT. Philadelphia provides a TelecommunicatImplemented in the continue to work with the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, and COIT to Technology Highway: working example of this. ions Services Future determine next steps. Potholes or Possibilities 2005-06 San Francisco’s 5.3 Ensure, as a part of a restructured IT governance body, that the CIO is provided with the authority needed General Will Not Be Support implementation action by Department of Telecommunication and Information to overhaul the City’s fragmented system and oversee all aspects of the City’s IT. Philadelphia provides a Services Implemented: Not Information Systems. Technology Highway: working example of this. Agency (GSA) Warranted or Not Potholes or Reasonable Possibilities 2005-06 Response 2007 Response Text CGJ Year Report Title Recommendation Required 2007 Response (1) 2005-06 San Francisco’s 5.3 Ensure, as a part of a restructured IT governance body, that the CIO is provided with the authority needed Mayor’s Office Requires Further We will work with DTIS to determine what changes in the Administrative Information to overhaul the City’s fragmented system and oversee all aspects of the City’s IT. Philadelphia provides a Analysis Code, if any, are appropriate and should be implemented. Technology Highway: working example of this. Potholes or Possibilities