Mendocino County Grand Jury • 2005-2006 • Agency Response
Response to: Willits Police Department and Holding Cells

City of Willits*

Published: December 05, 2006 6 pages
Ver PDF original

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F4

Findings and Recommendations 13 findings

F1
The budget of the Willits Police Department provides for a staff of one chief, three sergeants, ten patrol officers, one community services officer, five dispatchers and one administrative assistant [supervisor]. Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
At the time of the Grand Jury's visit, three patrol officer positions were vacant, two of them unfilled and one unfunded. One dispatcher position was unfilled. Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The Administrative Assistant [Supervisor] is in cross training for Dispatcher. Agree. There currently is neither a female nor a bi-lingual patrol officer.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Housing and quality of life are important considerations when recruiting personnel for WPD. Agree. According to the California Board of Corrections Inspection Report of 2005, the
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Willits Police Department Holding Cells were out of compliance because not all required Policies and Procedures were included in the Jail Manual. Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
On occasion there are not enough officers to adequately staff the holding cells and still respond to calls. We partially agree, as this only occurs at times where staffing dips to the point on a given shift where all on-duty officers are involved in the booking process, and there is a short wait until a transport officer can be called out from home. Having officers involved in an arrest limits the availability of backup in cases where one officer must break free to handle an additional call for service. The recent hiring of a community services officer to help with prisoner transports and the filling of vacant patrol positions has greatly decreased those periods where staffing creates a conflict over response to calls for service versus prisoner handling.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
General Orders (operating procedures) for the WPD are being revised with funding provided by Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund [REMIF]. Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Currently one staff person is qualified to be a custodian in the evidence room; other staff are undergoing training. Agree. Currently our Community Services Officer (CSO) has begun training in this area, with the hope that she will eventually be the custodian of the evidence room with supervisor backup from a police sergeant serving as a "check and balance".
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Transportation of prisoners to the County Jail or another facility is carried out within one hour. Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
At the time of the Grand Jury's visit, all holding cells were clean and facilities were found to be in working order. Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
WPD does not possess tasers. Disagree. Willits Police Department did not possess tasers at the time of the Grand Jury visit; however, tasers were recently purchased. They have not yet been pending implementation of a training program and the deployed, publishing/implementation of the REMIF General Order Manual section relating to this tool.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
The Emergency Plan for the City of Willits was last revised in 1998. Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
Total drug arrests are up by approximately 300% over the last five years. Agree.
No recommendations for this finding

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.