Santa Cruz County Grand Jury
• 2014-2015
Evaluation of the Serial Inebriate Program Why is it at risk? 20132014 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 7 findings
F1
Lack of Main Jail capacity for 647(f) violators often leads to release without booking, arraignment, adjudication into SIP, or admission into treatment.
Related Recommendations (3)
R2
The Sheriff should ensure that the Main Jail reserves 3 to 6 beds for the booking and assessment of SIPeligible 647(f) violators. (F1)
R5
The Sheriff should explore jail space alternatives using Rountree beds or modular buildings either at the Main Jail or Rountree to satisfy the incustody requirements for inclusion in SIP. (F1, F2)
R6
HSA should fund a fulltime SIP case manager. (F1, F3)
F2
No Sobering Center is available to provide an alternative to the Main Jail for offenders.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The Sheriff should explore jail space alternatives using Rountree beds or modular buildings either at the Main Jail or Rountree to satisfy the incustody requirements for inclusion in SIP. (F1, F2)
F3
The current halftime SIP case manager cannot initiate contact with those in custody in a timely manner.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
HSA should fund a fulltime SIP case manager. (F1, F3)
F4
The present low rate that the county pays for treatment beds has caused delays in SIP clients being placed into recovery programs.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
HSA should fund treatment beds at a more competitive rate. (F4)
F5
There is insufficient funding for SLE programs for SIP clients.
Related Recommendations (2)
R4
The SIP Steering Committee should modify SIP to include mandatory SLE placement after treatment. (F5, F6)
R8
HSA should fund more SLE space for SIP clients. (F5)
F6
The current SIP 306090 day treatment schedule is not long enough to adequately treat alcoholism.
Related Recommendations (2)
R3
The SIP Steering Committee should modify SIP to extend treatment times. (F6)
R4
The SIP Steering Committee should modify SIP to include mandatory SLE placement after treatment. (F5, F6)
F7
All parties to the SIP agreement (Board of Supervisors, HSA, Sheriff’s Office, Public Defender’s Office, District Attorney's Office, Corrections Department, Capitola Police Department, Scotts Valley Police Department, Santa Cruz City Police Department) have not implemented any solutions to address the impact of jail overcrowding on SIP. 10
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
All parties to the SIP agreement should create a plan with measurable steps to ensure that SIP can function effectively (F7)