📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
Santa Cruz County Grand Jury
• 2008-2009
Who is Watching Our Special Districts?
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 9 findings
F1
Page 75
Each county LAFCO operates independently and may adopt local policies. [LAFCO 101]
F2
Page 75
LAFCO, through Municipal Service and Sphere-of-Influence reviews, may hold special districts accountable for meeting community service needs, including governmental structure and operational efficiencies. [Government Code 56439(a)(5)]
F3
Page 75
From the inception of special districts, they were required to operate by “rules,” often redefined as bylaws or rules of proceedings as in (Kehoe) Government Code 61045(f).
F4
Page 76
All special districts fall under the mandate of the Ralph M. Brown Act, adopted in 1953 [Government Code 54950 to 54962], which requires agencies to have open meetings.
F5
Page 76
In Santa Cruz County the special district that initiated this investigation has operated, and others may continue to operate, in violation of statutes requiring adoption of bylaws and parliamentary procedures. No Response Required
F6
Page 76
Santa Cruz County special districts have never been required to submit bylaws, parliamentary procedures and mission statements to LAFCO.
F7
Page 76
LAFCO special district files in Santa Cruz County contain very few, if any, copies of bylaws, parliamentary procedures or mission statements.
F8
Page 76
In Santa Cruz County no governmental agency has provided special district oversight to ensure existence of and operation within bylaws and parliamentary procedures. Who Is Watching Our Special Districts? 2008–2009 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report with Responses Response: LAFCO – AGREES
F9
Page 77
Among the 78 special districts within Santa Cruz county that are the subject of this report, all are authorized to operate under various principal acts and California statutes. No Response Required
Recommendations 6
-
R1Page 73Santa Cruz LAFCO commissioners should require that a mission statement accompany the initial application for formation of a special district.
-
R2Page 73Santa Cruz LAFCO commissioners should require bylaws and parliamentary procedures be adopted, presented to and permanently lodged with LAFCO of formation of a new district.
-
R3Page 73Santa Cruz LAFCO commissioners should require all existing special districts to have bylaws and parliamentary procedures and to submit copies for LAFCO’s files
-
R4Page 73The Santa Cruz LAFCO office should act as a central repository and maintain copies of each special district’s bylaws, parliamentary procedures and, if applicable, mission statement.
-
R5Page 74The public should have access during normal County business hours or by electronic media to LAFCO copies of special district governing documents.
-
R6Page 74The LAFCO commissioners and/or the County Board of Supervisors should draft enforceable penalties for failure to comply with these recommendations, following adoption.