El Dorado County Grand Jury • 2002-2003

El Dorado County Grand Jury Resolution(PDF, 8kb)

Published: June 20, 2003 1 pages

Ver PDF original

⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings and recommendations have not been extracted yet.

The full report content may still be accessible via the PDF link above.

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

El Dorado Union High School(PDF, 114KB)

February 10, 2002 • 3 pages • 4 responses View Details ▾

PDF

4 responses to findings and recommendations

Of the nine County employees tested during 2000/01 and 2001/02, five were found unfit for duty.

Response: Unknown Score: 0

The Board of Supervisors, with the assistance of the County Counsel and the Manager of Procurement and Contracts’ Office, should establish and enforce a procedure for departments to meet legal specifications and to be in compliance with procedures in awarding contracts for services.

Response: Unknown

Score: 0

Employees must travel to the doctor’s office in Sacramento, including employees who reside and work in South Lake Tahoe.

Response: Unknown Score: 0

The Board of Supervisors and the CAO should hold all County departments accountable for the policies and procedures established by the Manager of Procurement and Contracts’ Office.

Response: Unknown

Score: 0