San Joaquin County Grand Jury
• 2015-2016
• Agency Response
Response to:
Homelessness in San Joaquin County
Office of the County Administrator Monica Nino, County Administrator Deb West, Assistant County Administrator
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 3 findings
F1
1: There is no documentation to verify when and by whom VBM ballots are picked up by Registrar of Voters (ROV) staff from the Postal Service. Response to F1.1: Agree. Information Systems Division concurs with the Grand Jury’s finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
1: By September 1, 2016, ROV develop written policies and procedures for daily tracking of the VBM ballots picked up at the post office. Tracking should include who picked up the ballots, when they were picked up, how many were received and when they arrived at the ROV office. Response to R1.1: This recommendation has been implemented. N. San Joaquin Street, Suite 640 | Stockton, California 95202 | T 209 468 3203 | F 209 468 2875 Office of the County Administrator The recommended policies and procedures for the daily tracking of the VBM ballots picked up at the post office by the ROV staff were developed in April 2016. A complete copy of the procedures and associated forms were provided to the Grand Jury on April 21, 2016. The new procedures and associated forms were fully utilized by the ROV staff during the 2016 Gubernatorial Primary Election (held on June 7, 2016). However, it should be noted that the day after the 2016 Gubernatorial Primary Election (June 8, 2016), ROV received over 1,400 VBM ballots that were post marked on June 7 (Election Day). This is the same situation experienced by San Joaquin County in 2014 when ROV received 799 VBM ballots from the post office the day after the election. Even with ROV’s implementation of detailed record keeping at the behest of the Grand Jury, the County still has no control over the timeliness of the VBM processing/delivery by the post office. Fortunately, the Legislature now allows ROVs statewide to process VBMs postmarked on or before Election Day, as long as the VBMs are received by ROV within three days of the election. This change in California Election Code became effective on January 1, 2015; a direct response by the Legislature to the late delivery of VBMs to ROVs that occurred across California.
F2
1: The ballots were moved from a secured 24-hour surveillance facility to a less secure location. Response to F2.1: Agree. 2 of 15 Office of the County Administrator Information Systems Division concurs with the Grand Jury’s finding. The Stockton Metropolitan Airport warehouse (the warehouse temporarily used by the ROV) is not equipped with either a security system or camera system. However, it should be noted that unrestricted access to the Stockton Metropolitan Airport warehouse does require a background check and the Airport grounds (including the area surrounding the Airport warehouse) are patrolled 24-hours per day. Also, it is important to note that the ballots for the June 3, 2014 election were moved from a warehouse previously leased by ROV, to an interim warehouse facility located on the Stockton Metropolitan Airport grounds nearly a year after the June 2014 election process was completed. The ROV stored election materials at the Airport warehouse facility for approximately 10 months while the new ROV warehouse was prepared for occupancy (installation of a security system, electrical and other construction activities required for occupancy).
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
1: By September 1, 2016, ROV store all ballots and equipment in a secured location with 24-hour surveillance. 3 of 15 Office of the County Administrator Response to R2.1: This recommendation has been implemented. The San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors approved a lease agreement for a new ROV warehouse in October 2015. Tenant improvements were required for the new warehouse to meet ROV’s operational and security needs. The landlord made the required tenant improvements to the facility and the improvements were completed in March 2016. Tenant improvements made to the new ROV warehouse include implementation of a 24-hour video camera system that records the activities in the new warehouse, as well as installation of a monitored security alarm system. In April 2016, ROV ballots and equipment were moved from the Airport warehouse facility to the new ROV warehouse. As a result of these actions taken by the County, this Grand Jury recommendation was addressed in April 2016. Recommendation R2.2: By September 1, 2016, ROV develop and implement a policy to keep and store all surveillance data per canvass procedures for the storage of all ballots. Response to R2.2: This recommendation will be implemented by September 1, 2016. Information Systems Division / ROV will develop and implement a policy for the retention of surveillance video related to the storage of ballots. The surveillance video that is retained will cover the critical periods in the election process. The County will retain this video for a period of time that will correspond with the retention period for the related ballots and voting materials. The new written policy will be developed and implemented by September 1, 2016. Recommendation R2.3: By September 1, 2016, ROV develop and implement a chain of custody for all materials brought into and removed from the storage facilities. Response to R2.3: This recommendation will be implemented by September 1, 2016. For the last several years, Information Systems Division / ROV has utilized automated asset tracking to monitor the chain of custody of critical equipment and materials that move between the ROV warehouse and other locations during the elections process. As noted previously, ROV does not currently document the “chain of custody” for some election materials that move between the ROV facilities once an election is complete. San Joaquin County ROV will modify its existing chain of custody practices so that the movement of critical election materials between the ROV facilities after an election is 4 of 15 Office of the County Administrator documented. The revised procedures will be developed and implemented by September 1, 2016. B. San Joaquin County Public Defender Fees – Case #1506 – Collection of Fees from Indigent Defendants 1.0 Findings
F3
1: The City of Lodi along with private individuals and agencies have taken encouraging steps to address the homeless issue. The success Lodi has achieved can be attributed to the coordinated efforts of public agencies, non-profit groups and churches (See Appendix 2). 12 of 15 Office of the County Administrator Response to F3.1: Agree. The County agrees with the finding that the success the City of Lodi has achieved can be attributed to the coordinated efforts of public agencies, non-profit groups and churches.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 1
1: The County should use Lodi’s efforts as a framework to start the strategic planning process. Response to R3.1: This recommendation will be implemented but not by January 1, 2017. The Homelessness Task Force includes representatives of public and private agencies involved in the Lodi effort and a presentation summarizing Lodi’s effort has been made to the Homelessness Task Force. This recommendation has not been implemented, but will be proposed to the Homelessness Task Force.