📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Trinity County Grand Jury
• 2001-2002
Financial Audits of Special Districts and Handbook for Special Districts
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 2 findings
F1
Page 34
At the October 30, 2001, meeting, Mr. Muir basically reiterated the position that his office is aware of the delinquency of the audits from the three special districts in question. However, due to the expenses required to conduct the audits and the limited funds avail- able to the districts, he was giving them as much latitude as pos- sible in the completion of the requirement under the Code. In the case of the Lewiston Community Service District, Mr. Muir con- curred with the 2000-2001 Grand Jury that due to the Lowden Fire, their records had been destroyed and he was allowing them time to reconstruct these records. Mr. Muir assured the committee mem- bers that his office was aware of its responsibilities under the Code regarding audits of special districts and would continue to monitor their progress.
F2
Page 34
Responding to a follow-up suggestion from the previous Trinity County Grand Jury, the 2001-2002 Grand Jury decided to update the Handbook for Special Districts originally prepared by the 1996- 1997 Grand Jury. State Law defines a special district as “any agency of the state for the local performance of government or propriety functions within limited boundaries.” In plain language, a special district is a sepa- rate local government that delivers public services. Trinity County has 17 special districts. The 1996-1997 Grand Jury concluded “that there is no reliable, comprehensive source of accurate information that special districts can use for the legislative aspect of district business.” That Grand Jury created a Handbook for Special Dis- tricts to assist the governing bodies of special districts in Trinity County in the performance of their duties. The handbook had not been updated since 1997. The Grand Jury Education/Special Districts Committee reviewed the Handbook for Special Districts, determined what changes were needed and edited and updated the handbook. Changes to the Handbook include but are not limited to: 1) an updated Special Districts Index to include the current names of Board Members, mailing addresses, meeting times and locations; 2) the insertion of a summary of the requirements of the Brown Act (the intent being to have public agencies conduct their business and make their decisions in open public meetings); 3) the insertion of a memorandum dated May 18, 2000, from David Hammer, County Counsel, establishing a procedure for advising newly elected and appointed officials and designated employees of special dis- tricts of certain conflict of interest laws; and 4) an overall consoli- dation and standardized format of the handbook. The handbook will be distributed to all Special Districts in Trinity County and to the County Board of Supervisors.
Recommendations 2
-
R1Page 34The 2001-2002 Trinity County Grand Jury concurs with the previ- ous year Grand Jury’s conclusion that the Greater Hayfork Valley Park and Recreation District, the Salyer Community Service Dis- trict, and the Lewiston Community Service District are more than 12 months overdue in audits of their respective districts and are not in compliance with government code. The Grand Jury recognizes that at times state regulations impose financial hardships on small county governments, including spe- cial districts. Nevertheless, the County Auditor/Controller needs to work closely with the special districts, assist them in their efforts to comply with the required financial reviews and insure that overdue audits are completed by the end of the 2001-2002 fiscal year.
-
R2Page 34None. RESPONSES REQUIRED: Under Penal Code 933, the following entities are required to re- spond to the listed findings and recommendations within the re- quired time period: ENTITY