Santa Cruz County Grand Jury • 2016-2017 • Agency Response
Response to: Reports

Santa Cruz County Agend

Published: August 22, 2016 15 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings and Recommendations 5 findings

F1 Page 5
The Domestic Violence Commission has not met since 2013. X AGREE PARTIALLY DISAGREE – explain the disputed portion DISAGREE – explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree):
No recommendations for this finding
F2 Page 6
A quorum was not reached at the majority of the 2013 meetings X AGREE PARTIALLY DISAGREE – explain the disputed portion DISAGREE – explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree):
No recommendations for this finding
F3 Page 7
The mandated 24–28 person membership is too large. X AGREE PARTIALLY DISAGREE – explain the disputed portion DISAGREE – explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree):
No recommendations for this finding
F4 Page 8
The District Attorney’s Office has appointed a leader to organize the new Domestic Violence Commission. X AGREE PARTIALLY DISAGREE – explain the disputed portion DISAGREE – explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree):
No recommendations for this finding
F5 Page 9
There was universal concern that the dedicated Domestic Violence Court had been abandoned. X AGREE PARTIALLY DISAGREE – explain the disputed portion DISAGREE – explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree):
No recommendations for this finding