Santa Cruz County Grand Jury
• 2016-2017
• Agency Response
Response to:
Reports
Santa Cruz County Agend
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F1
Page 5
The Domestic Violence Commission has not met since 2013. X AGREE PARTIALLY DISAGREE – explain the disputed portion DISAGREE – explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree):
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Page 6
A quorum was not reached at the majority of the 2013 meetings X AGREE PARTIALLY DISAGREE – explain the disputed portion DISAGREE – explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree):
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Page 7
The mandated 24–28 person membership is too large. X AGREE PARTIALLY DISAGREE – explain the disputed portion DISAGREE – explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree):
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Page 8
The District Attorney’s Office has appointed a leader to organize the new Domestic Violence Commission. X AGREE PARTIALLY DISAGREE – explain the disputed portion DISAGREE – explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree):
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Page 9
There was universal concern that the dedicated Domestic Violence Court had been abandoned. X AGREE PARTIALLY DISAGREE – explain the disputed portion DISAGREE – explain why Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree):
No recommendations for this finding