📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 3 findings
F1
Page 8
Because neither MJUSD nor SVJUSD has a Board Policy requiring pre-employment drug screening, it is more likely that children may be exposed to a school employee with a controlled substance abuse problem.
F2
Page 8
Because pre-employment drug screening has become a negotiable issue in the recent past, it is essential for the employees’ unions to sign off on a pre-employment drug screening policy.
F3
Page 8
Due to the common recreational use and abuse of drugs, employee training on identifying controlled substance abuse should occur often to inform new employees and refresh the memories of long-term employees.
Recommendations 3
-
R1Page 8Both MJUSD and SVJUSD should adopt a board policy requiring pre-employment drug screening as an added measure to keep children safe.
-
R2Page 8The Grand Jury urges the Classified and
-
R3Page 8The Grand Jury urges all four Districts to provide