📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Sacramento County Grand Jury • 2017-2018

Sacramento County Grand Jury 2017-2018 Contract Organizations One innovative program available to Sacramento County

Published: June 07, 2018 108 pages Consolidated Report
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 9 findings

F1
CPSU has experienced, compassionate and dedicated staff whose priority is the welfare of the children they serve.
F2
The current location of the CPSU is in a high crime neighborhood that places CPSU staff and traumatized youths in undue danger.
F3
Since the enactment of SB 855 in 2014, no measurable progress has been made to find suitable options that address the unique treatment and placement needs of the expanded population of high risk children.
F4
There is a lack of communication on spending priorities between senior management and the needs of the service providers.
F5
CPS and DHHS are still focused on ineffective recruitment strategies rather than considering innovative approaches to gain more placement models for the expanded population it serves.
F6
CPS personnel hired to recruit placement opportunities for children are unable to focus their efforts due to other job activities.
F7
The Audit Committee is comprised of department heads. Other governments that have established audit committees have included decision-makers (elected officials) and members of the public to assist the Board and the Auditor in fulfilling oversight responsibilities. 24
F8
The Internal Audit Unit, as well as the Department of Finance as a whole, are understaffed in IT Support. Maintaining transparency of operations to the public is difficult, if not impossible, without adequate IT support.
F9
The Internal Auditor has infrequent, irregular input to the COMPASS Steering Committee.

Recommendations 9