Marin County Grand Jury • 2026-2027

Measure A and Voter Choice: Rethinking Parks and Agriculture Funding in Marin

Published: June 30, 2026 15 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings 8 findings

F1
Marin County Parks has successfully administered Measure A funding and has evolved its focus from land acquisition toward stewardship, maintenance, wildfire resilience, and long- term sustainability.
F2
Fixed allocation formulas within Measure A limit Marin County Parks' ability to adjust to changing priorities and long-term planning.
F3
The fixed allocation of Measure A funds to cities, towns, and special districts limits Marin County Parks' ability to direct funding toward larger regional projects and countywide priorities.
F4
The Measure A Oversight Committee provides meaningful oversight of Measure A expenditures, but other bodies, including the Parks and Open Space Commission, provide similar oversight and opportunities for public participation.
F5
Information regarding conservation easement payments and recipients is not easily accessible to the public, in contrast to information regarding other Measure A-funded programs.
F6
Measure A combines parks and open space funding with sustainable agriculture funding in a way that is unusual among California county funding measures.
F7
Agricultural conservation easements now protect more than half of West Marin County's agricultural land, and provide an additional layer of protection beyond A-60 zoning restrictions.
F8
Marin County voters have repeatedly demonstrated strong support for parks and open space funding, but have not had an opportunity to separately evaluate sustainable agriculture funding.

Recommendations 6