📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Humboldt County Grand Jury • 2002-2003

03-cc-01 Followup to 2000-2001 Grand Jury Report

15 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 9 findings

F1 Page 40
All employees in ISD are finger printed and have background checks through the sheriff's department, which uses Live Scan. This is a state system that maintains criminal history records. Report 01-03 HUMBOLDT COUNTY SHERIFF'S FARM INTRODUCTION Members of the Humboldt County Grand Jury visited the Humboldt County Sheriff's Farm located next to the Rohnerville Airport in the Fortuna area. Members of the grand jury met with two officers from the Sheriff's department and were given a tour of the farm and its operations. There were Sheriff’s Work Alternative Program (SWAP) personnel performing work at the farm during the visit. THE HUMBOLDT COUNTY 2000-2001 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDED THE FOLLOWING: R-1 A tractor located at the Sheriff's boat yard be transferred to the farm. SHERIFF'S RESPONSE: Partially agree. The tractor located at our boat yard is used frequently in moving large and sometimes extremely heavy equipment. We need a tractor for this same purpose. We have since obtained an additional tractor with a front-end bucket and a backhoe. We are using this tractor at the farm to good advantage. FINDING The 2002-2003 grand jury makes the following finding:
F2 Page 43
No action is expected. THE 2000-2001 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDED THE FOLLOWING: R-3 All obsolete and unusable materials, equipment, and debris be disposed of. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESPONSE TO R-3 This recommendation has been implemented and is in process. The removal of obsolete and unusable materials, equipment and debris is an ongoing process. Because of the large amount of accumulated debris, a portion is budgeted for removal each year. Considering budget constraints, it will take several years to fully complete this recommendation. FINDING The 2002-2003 grand jury makes the following finding pertinent to R-3:
F3 Page 43
The removal of obsolete and unserviceable equipment is an ongoing process at the airport. THE 2000-2001 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDED THE FOLLOWING: R-4 The remaining underground fuel storage tanks installed by the federal government be removed. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESPONSE: Partially completed and the remainder is in process. Most of the underground tanks have been removed. The remaining tanks will be processed for removal through a contract with Winzler and Kelly. FINDING The 2002-2003 grand jury makes the following finding pertinent to R-4:
F4 Page 43
Two underground fuel tanks were removed this year (2002) at a cost of $25,000.00 per tank with the others to be removed at later dates. One other 50,000-gallon concrete fuel tank has been cleaned and will not be removed. THE 2000-2001 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDED THE FOLLOWING: R-5 Upgrade the airport to include an air traffic control tower. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESPONSE Has been implemented. A mobile tower (temporary) has been secured and set up and is operational. Also funding for a permanent tower has been placed in the Federal budget by Representative Mike Thompson. FINDING The 2002-2003 grand jury makes the following finding pertinent to R-5:
F5 Page 44
The airport is still waiting for the permanent tower. Until then the airport will continue with the fully operational mobile tower. Report 01-08 HANDICAP PARKING ACCESSABILITY IN CITY OF EUREKA PUBLIC PARKING LOTS The 2002-2003 grand jury makes the following finding:
F6 Page 47
Pertinent to R-6: As of April 2003 the toilets in the Hoopa Substation had not been replaced.
F7 Page 47
Pertinent to R-7 The rear door has been repaired in the Hoopa Substation.
F8 Page 47
Pertinent to R-8 Did not determine if the fire door at the Hoopa Substation meets State standards
F9 Page 47
Pertinent to R-9 The Hoopa Substation does not meet ADA standards. Report 01-13 CLARK COMPLEX INTRODUCTION The Humboldt County Grand Jury inspected the Clark Complex, located on Harris Street between H and I Streets. A survey conducted by the 1999-2000 grand jury of custodial and maintenance procedure highlighted certain problems with the Clark Complex. The original building was built around 1916 as a hospital. The Clark addition was added in the late 1950s. The hospital moved out in the late 1970s. This complex now houses county offices for the following departments: public works, planning, election's office, coroner’s office, mental health, Sempervirens, rehabilitation center and various outbuildings used for storage. THE 2000-2001 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDED THE FOLLOWING: R-1 The County meet ADA access standards at the main building of the Clark Complex. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESPONSE: Will be implemented. The county has currently contracted with a firm to conduct an evaluation of all county buildings for disability access. Changes identified as a result of this evaluation will then be prioritized and budgeted. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES RESPONSE: Agree. Access to the building for the disabled currently is from the ground floor. A phone allows people to contact Planning, Elections and Public Works who will open the locked doors and escort the person or persons to the elevator from which the elevator can be accessed. The county has two disabled employees at Clark who routinely use this access for the building. The county currently is updating its facilities, evaluations for all buildings, including Clark, which will be used to complete an ADA transition plan. FINDING The 2002-2003 grand jury makes the following finding:

Recommendations 9