📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
Placer County Grand Jury
• 2021-2022
Placer County Grand Jury 2021-2022 Final Report Officer (ciso). The re-classification was triggered by the Placer
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 2 findings
F2
Page 42
could be. There is no formal requirement for report updates by the Security Working Committee to the Leadership Committee, resulting in a lack of prioritization by
F3
Page 42
county departments and potential cybersecurity weaknesses. Placer County data, infrastructure, and applications are well protected from cybersecurity attacks. 34 -2022 Final Report
Recommendations 1
-
R2Page 43sent to the committee meeting. By November 1, 2022, the Chief Information Officer shall create a policy to require that the Chief Information Security Officer provide semiannual updates to the Leadership Committee on cybersecurity. These two semiannual updates should include a report on attendance to the quarterly meetings. In this way, the department executives would be confident that their department’s concerns were Requeresptr efosern Rteed sinp tohne sSeec urity Working Committee quarterly meetings. Pursuant to Penal Code § 933.05, the Placer County Grand Jury requests a response from t he following governing bodies: Recommendations Response Requiring Response Due Date Jane Christenson R1 October 1, 2022 Acting County Executive Officer 175 Fulweiler Ave. JAaurbruerttn ,T ChAie 9s5s6e0n3 R2 October 1, 2022 Chief Information Officer 3091 County Center Dr. Suite 160 ACuobpuirens, C sA e9n56t 0t3o : Deborah Curtis Chief Information Security Officer 2986 Richardson Dr. Auburn, CA 95603 35 Graph 1 – Maturity results for the five categories Five categories of cybersecurity from Placer County 2021 36 – Steady progress in cybersecurity maturity from 2018 to 2021 The chart below shows that Placer County has demonstrated steady improvement in all m easured areas: identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover. 37 – Placer County NCSR scores to scores of peer counties One interesting use of the results is to compare Placer County cybersecurity maturity to the average of other California counties. Placer County’s scores are much higher than the average of other counties. See graph and table below: 38 Homelessness in Placer County Photo Credit: Norma J. Worley 39 -2022 Final Report Homelessness in Placer County