Ii. Background After initial investigation, the CGJ expressed interest in determining how the Lausd

Recommendations 6

• R1

  Page 204
  An initial assessment of existing and projected parking supply and ridership data for Metro stations along major existing and planned transit lines.
• R2

  Page 204
  A review of Metro’s plans, policies, and procedures with respect to parking at Metro stations, with a particular focus on facilitating increased access and ridership.
• R3

  Page 204
  The selection of Metro stations for in-depth analysis of existing or planned parking supply, parking supply history, and related land use developments in local jurisdictions surrounding Metro stations.
• R4

  Page 204
  A literature review to identify key sources for understanding the links between parking supply, transit ridership, and transit revenues. This would also include an evaluation of demographic, social, and technological changes that may affect parking needs in the next five, ten, or fifteen years.
• R5

  Page 204
  An assessment of the effectiveness of Metro’s planning process for parking, as well as its parking policies and procedures, and identify recommendations for improvement. For an in-depth review of practices and operations at the local level, the audit team selected six existing stations with parking lots, and three planned stations, as noted below: 198 2015-2016 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT
• R18-64

  Page 207
  years 65% 93% Over 65 years 12% 3% Race: White 27% 17% Black 8% 18% American Indian 0.2% <1% Asian/Pacific Islander 15% 12% Latino 48% 47% Other 2% 6% Income: Median Household Income $55,746 $21,980 Average Household Income $83,104 $37,142 Source: 2014 American Community Survey (ACS); Metro