Orange County Grand Jury • 1999-2000 • Agency Response
Response to: The Rainy Season's "First Flush" Hits the Harbors of Orange County 5/17/00, 913K

Orange County is No Camelot for Emancipated Youth

Published: February 09, 2000 26 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings and Recommendations 7 findings

F1
The County database and information about foster youths is inadequate. There has been very little tracking of youths in foster care and group homes. As a result, answers to such questions as their health and educational background are not readily available for appropriate decision making. County projections about the number of emancipated youths are strictly an estimate. There is no information about what percentage have a high school diploma, about how many attend college, or how many end up homeless. A response is required for Finding 1 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Social Services Agency should direct the Technology Services Department to develop a tracking system to collect data for 16- to 21-year-old foster youths. A response is required for Recommendation 1 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency. 17
F2
The current Independent Living Program for emancipated youths in Orange County, which is a critical program for self-sufficiency and independent living, can be considered mediocre at best. To be effective, it should be presented in a transitional housing milieu with attendance mandatory. A response is required for Finding 2 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Independent Living Program for emancipated youths should be presented with a transitional housing program which includes independence but also supervision and coaching and counseling, especially in the areas of education and employment. The transitional housing programs that exist in Orange County should be authorized to present the Independent Living Program and should also be compensated. A response is required for Recommendation 2 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
F3
The measure of success for a pre-emancipation Independent Living Program, following the instruction of AB1111, should be enabling participants to seek a high school diploma, providing vocational training and job readiness, locating and obtaining housing, providing daily living skills and providing individual and group counseling. The Independent Living Program should be more than discussion and classes. There should be “hands on” experience and concrete assistance in preparing for independence prior to discharge. A response is required for Finding 3 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The pre-emancipation Independent Living Program should be improved by authorizing and compensating group homes for presenting the Independent Living Program because they will be able to provide more concrete and hands-on assistance and address the transportation problem. Group homes are better qualified to monitor educational progress and provide tutors, if needed, to help their youths obtain a high school diploma, which is the most important element of the Independent Living Program. A response is required for Recommendation 3 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
F4
The new John H. Chafee Foster Care Independence Program (HR3443) requires more extensive assessment of performance based on certain outcomes, including education, employment, avoidance of dependency, homelessness, non-marital childbirth, and incarceration. A response is required for Finding 4 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency. 16
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Independent Living Program should focus on key areas that are critical to independent living: education, employment, housing, and reducing the probability of early parenthood. A study with specific recommendations should be initiated to evaluate the Independent Living Program in Orange County. An evaluation of the program is needed that links the objectives of the program with the results. A response is required for Recommendation 4 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the County Executive Office and the Social Services Agency.
F5
The relatively few programs in Orange County designed to serve emancipated youths are scattered and fragmented. Those who operate them often do so without knowledge of other similar programs. A response is required for Finding 5 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The Social Services Agency should take the leadership role in coordinating all of the current, fragmented programs for emancipated youths currently in Orange County. A response is required for Recommendation 5 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the County Executive Office.
F6
In spite of the past two Grand Jury reports alerting the Orange County Board of Supervisors to this critical situation, the Board of Supervisors has not budgeted funds for transitional housing, or taken formal action on transitional housing for emancipated youths. The Social Services Agency has responded to prior Grand Jury reports of the past two years by claiming that they are developing and implementing transitional housing for youths after emancipation. At the present time, Orange County has very few housing options available for emancipating youths. A few small privately-funded programs are providing services but are not available to accommodate the number of estimated youths needing transitional housing services. A response is required for Finding 6 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The Board of Supervisors, County Executive Office, and the Social Services Agency, following leadership on both the federal and state levels, should elevate transitional housing for emancipated youths to the highest priority. A response is required for Recommendation 6 from the Board of Supervisors, and requested from the County Executive Office, and the Social Services Agency. 18
F7
The County of Orange does not have an administrative umbrella to coordinate programs and services for emancipating youths. The missing linchpin is a director with authority and responsibility to coordinate the efforts of all concerned agencies and private non- profit caregivers. A response is required for Finding 7 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the County Executive Office and the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
An administrative position should be created whose purpose is to coordinate all of the County and private agencies similar to the collaborative efforts of Friends of the Children Bridges and the Probation Department’s Children and Family Resource Centers. This position would also have the responsibility and accountability for all pre- and post- emancipated Independent Living Programs. A response is required for Recommendation 7 from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the County Executive Office.

Conclusions 1

Commendations 1