Modoc County Grand Jury • 2025-2026

Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Modoc County Grand Jury Report*

Published: June 24, 2026 27 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 7 findings

F1
Residents in unincorporated communities are hesitant to report code violations due to a lack of familiarity with the complaint process and a perception that reports will not result in action.
F2
Interaction between residents of unincorporated areas and county officials regarding code enforcement is largely reactive, occurring only after a formal complaint is filed, rather than through a proactive process. This style of interaction has left residents of unincorporated areas unsatisfied with the current way code enforcement is approached.
F3
The absence of a unified, publicly accessible explanation of the code enforcement workflow, coupled with a lack of visibility into how complaints are triaged, investigated, and resolved, has fostered public distrust and created a perception among residents that the county has abandoned unincorporated areas to blight and safety hazards.
F4
Authority for code enforcement is fragmented across multiple agencies (Environmental Health, Sheriff's Department, Building and Safety, etc.), resulting in no single department holding clear accountability for enforcement outcomes. The absence of a centralized permanent authority with clear oversight responsibility for code enforcement prevents Modoc County from meeting eligibility requirements for various state and federal grant programs, thereby limiting access to critical funding needed to expand enforcement capacity and improve the conditions of unincorporated communities.
F5
The county currently lacks a risk-based prioritization framework for code enforcement expenditures, leading to inefficient allocation of limited resources and an inability to target high-risk properties effectively.
F6
Participation in the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) vehicle abatement program poses no financial risk to the Modoc County General Fund, and yet the county has not fully leveraged this state-provided program for removing abandoned vehicles.
F7
County employees responsible for code enforcement have met their statutory and procedural obligations within the existing complaint-driven system despite operating with limited staffing and funding resources.

Recommendations 5

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.